Tetracis montanaria Ferris
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.275566 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6209063 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF6D3A-FFE7-DF6F-68C4-101BFC56FD7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetracis montanaria Ferris |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tetracis montanaria Ferris , New Species
( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 3 – 11 , 54–58 View FIGURES 42 – 56 View FIGURES 57 – 71 , 96 View FIGURES 95 – 101 , 111 View FIGURES 102 – 117 , 127–128 View FIGURES 125 – 132 , 139 View FIGURES 137 – 139 )
Diagnosis: Geography alone separates this species, since no other Tetracis species are known from the mountains of SE Arizona. The two similar species, T. j. jubararia and T. pallulata do not have a PM line that breaks sharply basad at M3 and manifests a flattened “S-shape” overall.
Description: Adults ( Figs. 10 View FIGURES 3 – 11 , 54–58 View FIGURES 42 – 56 View FIGURES 57 – 71 ): FWL: 22–25 mm. Antenna pale ochreous to whitish dorsally, nearly filiform, ventrally densely setose with gaps between segments (laminate), narrower in female. Palpi moderately broad, porrect or slightly upcurved, about 1.8x eye width, dark ochreous with dark brown tips. Head, thorax, abdomen, legs ochreous, varying in hue across individuals. Legs and ventral abdomen flecked with scattered brown scales. Wings: Base color generally ochreous orange-brown. FW apex weakly falcate. AM and PM lines brown; PM line narrow, flattened “S-shape”, with very narrow pale outer edge, bending sharply basad at vein M3; MB slightly darker then rest of wing. DHW with poorly-developed median line that fades out toward upper margin. Dark discal spots on FW and HW. Ventrally paler with dorsal markings repeated lightly. Male genitalia ( Figs. 96 View FIGURES 95 – 101 , 111 View FIGURES 102 – 117 ): Uncus of medium width, slightly decurved, tapering to bluntly pointed tip. Dorso-caudal margin of gnathos concave and irregular, with a robust narrow tapering upcurved spine at either side. Stubby furca (ca. 0.5x width of valve base) from middle of anellus tapers to pointed apex. Valve moderately broad with even margins, tapering to rounded apex with a well-developed triangular apical projection at the dorsal margin. Aedeagus with an incomplete ring of slender spinules at posterior end at base of vesica; everted vesica with patch of scattered sclerotized nodules on dome. Female genitalia ( Fig. 127 View FIGURES 125 – 132 ): A/ P = 0.6. Long unsclerotized tubular ductus bursae expanding very slightly at junction with corpus bursae, obscuring junction (ca. 1.7x length of corpus bursae). Corpus bursae ovoid with oval dentate signum located at middle.
Type material. Holotype ♂. UNITED STATES: ARIZONA, Graham Co., Mt. Graham, 8880’ (2708m), 32° 40.73’N, 109° 53.62’W, Cunningham Campground, 1 October, 2006, C. D. Ferris. [ AMNH]. Paratypes: Same locality as holotype, 1.x.2006 (25 ♂, 1 ♀), 9.x.2007 (6♂), 1.x.2008 (3♂); ARIZONA, Pima Co., Bear Wallow Rd., Santa Catalina Mts. , 8000’ (2440m), 6.x.2002, J. B. walsh (1♂). Paratypes in CNC, CDF, and JBW. Two female specimens ( Figs. 57-58 View FIGURES 57 – 71 ) from Apache Co., Arizona [Greer, 8 October, 2005, J. Vargo] are not included in the type series because of their very different color. Their correct placement can not be established until males are available for study. Their genitalia ( Fig. 128 View FIGURES 125 – 132 ), however, are consistent with T. montanaria , as are the shapes of the AM and PM lines.
Etymology. Adjective, “of the mountains.”
Material examined: No additional specimens beyond those mentioned above were examined; 8 dissections were made.
Biology: Unknown. Habitat is aspen-coniferous forest. Adults in early October (and possibly late September).
Distribution ( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 137 – 139 ): Southeastern Arizona, Graham Co., Mt. Graham and Pima Co., Santa Catalina Mts. from 8000–8900’ (2440–2715m);?Apache Co., White Mts.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Ennominae |
Genus |