Sulciclivina sagittaria singaporensis, Balkenohl, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.915.2379 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:78346F83-1177-4EAE-AFFD-D4DDCC1BFB83 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10410156 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2487CFA0-1157-4E1E-A406-B87C40F9D386 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:2487CFA0-1157-4E1E-A406-B87C40F9D386 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sulciclivina sagittaria singaporensis |
status |
subsp. nov. |
Sulciclivina sagittaria singaporensis subsp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:2487CFA0-1157-4E1E-A406-B87C40F9D386
Figs 21 View Figs 20–23 , 51, 53
Diagnosis
The subspecies differs from the nominotypical subspecies mainly by the distinctly sculptured frons of the head, and by the shape of the elytron, which is more elongate and parallel.
Etymology
The name refers to the city of Singapore where most of the specimens were found.
Type material
Holotype
SINGAPORE • ♀; with white labels and data: handwritten on the original mounting card with red ink “Spore” [Singapore] / printed in black “ SINGAPORE: C.J. Saunders. B.M.1929-369” / handwritten in black ink “987 A” / handwritten in black ink and printed “ Clivina sagittaria Bates H.E.Andrewes det.”; NHMUK.
Paratypes
SINGAPORE • 1 ♀, 2 specs; same data as for holotype but with number “377” and “897 A”, and one of them with barcode “ NHMUK015024561 About NHMUK ”; NHMUK • 1 ♀; “ MALAY PENIN: Selangor, F.M.S. Kuala Lumpur at light april 6th 1927 H.M. Pendlebury”, reverse side “EX COLL: F.M.S. MUSEUM” / “H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945-97.”; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding but “ April 20 th 1927 ”; NHMUK • 1 ♀; “ Singapore on Lizz bags” [sic] “1927 9 Ljiu” / “ H.E.Andrewes Coll. B.M.1945-97.”; NHMUK • 1 ♀; “Singapore 1921-23” / “ SINGAPORE: C.J. Saunders. B.M.1929-369.”; NHMUK • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding but with additional label: “B: 5/22 flur” [sic]; NHMUK • 1 ♀; “ Singapore Saunders” / “sagittaria ” / “From British Museum Collection” / “COLLECTIO KAREL KULT COLL. A.DOSTAL, 1999”; CADW .
Description
MEASUREMENTS. Holotype: body length 4.63 mm, width 1.23 mm; L/W of pronotum 1.04; L/W of elytra 2.06. All material: body length 4.63–5.1 mm (ẍ: = 4.88 mm *), width 1.23–1.34 mm (ẍ: = 1.26 mm *), L/W of pronotum 1.01–1.06 (ẍ: = 1.04*), L/W of elytra 2.05–2.11 (ẍ: = 2.09*); (*n = 8).
The subspecies differs from the nominotypical subspecies mainly in the following characters:
HEAD. The frons of the head is more rugose. This includes transverse rugae between the two arrow-like carinae. In addition, the head is much more punctured, mainly posteriorly. The antenna is moderately long, reaching just over the middle of the pronotum with antennomeres five to ten slightly longer than wide (L/W around 1.12).
PRONOTUM. Lateral margin of pronotum straighter than in the nominotypical subspecies, nearly concave in most of the specimens, crenulated. Disk with a paralateral and a paramedian group of cloud-like punctures, the paralateral cloud of punctures variable with its extension anteriorly. The proepisternum is slightly visible in dorsal view.
ELYTRON. The shape is more elongate and parallel. It is slightly more than twice as long as wide with maximum width at middle. The crenulation behind the humerus is more distinct.
HIND WINGS. In all of the eight female specimens, the alae are fully developed.
MALE GENITALIA. Unknown.
FEMALE GONOCOXITE (Fig. 51). The gonocoxites are angular at base.
Distribution
Known from the Malayan peninsula.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |