Suberites carnosus var. incrustans Topsent, 1900
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E233F731-D5FA-4032-B3A4-CEFE5A809C49 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10494358 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF4E397F-FFB2-3106-9786-FAF2BFFC00FC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Suberites carnosus var. incrustans Topsent, 1900 |
status |
|
Suberites carnosus var. incrustans Topsent, 1900 View in CoL
Suberites carnosus incrustans Topsent, 1900: 235–236 View in CoL (no illustration).
Suberites carnosus var. incrustans View in CoL ; Topsent 1925a: 633; Bibiloni 1981: 16.
Suberites carnosus View in CoL f. incrustans View in CoL ; Cabioch 1968: 216; Vacelet 1976: 174.
The form was described by Topsent predominantly from the Pas-de-Calais region (W coast of France) and from Banyuls (Mediterranean coast of France). The original text of Topsent (1900) would indicate that he considered the S. c. incrustans View in CoL (as well as the other mentioned S. carnosus View in CoL forms) as infrasubspecific, i.e. growth forms or morphotypes of a species, rather than proper (sub)specific taxa. But his assignment to a variety in 1925a and followed by a forma designation by Cabioch and Vacelet indicated it was subsequently considered a distinct taxon. No clear type material was indicated by Topsent. The description reminds strongly of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver (2003: 403 View in CoL , fig. 1 = Prosuberites epiphytum sensu Topsent 1900: 236 , not Lamarck 1814) described from the Oosterschelde, the Netherlands, 54.64°N 3.91°E, depth 0–1 m (holotype ZMA Por. 04403). Topsent (1900: 236) also pointed this out (as P. epiphytum ), but refuted conspecificity by alleging that the tylostyles of the two species were different, without explaining the difference. A further species with similarity to the present form is Protosuberites stephensae Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 35 View in CoL , a recent new name for the preoccupied P. incrustans View in CoL (sensu Stephens 1915b as Laxosuberites View in CoL ). The combination Suberites carnosus incrustans View in CoL is a junior primary homonym of Suberites incrustans Hansen, 1885 View in CoL (currently Protosuberites incrustans View in CoL ), and it needs to be renamed. I propose to assign the present forma to the synonymy of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver, 2003 View in CoL , thus removing the homonymy.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Suberites carnosus var. incrustans Topsent, 1900
Van Soest, Rob W. M. 2024 |
Suberites carnosus
Cabioch, L. 1968: 216 |
Suberites carnosus var. incrustans
Bibiloni, M. A. 1981: 16 |
Topsent, E. 1925: 633 |
Suberites carnosus incrustans
Topsent, E. 1900: 236 |