Stegana (Steganina) nigrita Malloch, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0113 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10869419 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C7E1B53-DD1A-D51F-FCD2-8EF2FC2953C3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stegana (Steganina) nigrita Malloch, 1924 |
status |
|
Stegana (Steganina) nigrita Malloch, 1924 View in CoL
( Figs. 9-16 View Figure 9 View Figure 10 View Figure 11 View Figure 12 View Figure 13 View Figure 14 View Figure 15 View Figure 16 )
Stegana nigrita Malloch, 1924a: 97 View in CoL (key, description). Malloch, 1924b: 1 (description); Heed, 1956: 61 (distribution); Heed, 1957: 76 (distribution); Wheeler, 1970: 79.6 (affiliation).
Stegana (Steganina) nigrita Malloch View in CoL : Wheeler, 1981: 31 (affiliation); Brake and Bächli, 2008: 298 (affiliation).
Type locality: Costa Rica, Province of Alajuela, Canton of San Mateo, Higuito.
Diagnosis. Generally blackish flies without distinct pleural bands. Surstylus trapezoid, double-walled, outer wall devoid of a row of prensisetae, innerly covered with tiny wart-shaped scales, scarcely setose in the lower region; inner wall brush-like, as it is densely covered in the anteromedial area with ca. 40 strong, curved, sharp-tipped setae. Aedeagus spherical, ca. 1/3 length of aedeagal apodeme, membranous except for two strongly sclerotized anterodorsal curved plates, covered dorsodistally and ventrodistally with seta-like scales giving a serrate aspect to the margins; not coalescent to the aedeagal apodeme.Aedeagal apodeme long, curved, rod-shaped, anteriorly expanded dorsoventrally, almost three times as long as the aedeagus. Ventral rod submedially (not distally) positioned, strongly sclerotized, conspicuously fan-shaped, distally very wide and linked to the pouched gonopods by membranous tissue. Outer and inner paraphyses unrecognizable.
Material examined (n = 22).
Holotype ♀ [#24], dissected, labeled: “ Higuito / SanMateoCR [ Costa Rica] // PabloSchild / coll // Stegana / nigrita / Type [handwritten] / Det. / J R Malloch [printed] // Type No. / 26684 [handwritten] / U.S.N.M. [red label] // USNMENT / [QR code] / 01096615 [back side] // Stegana / nigrita Malloch / Bächli & Vilela det. 2017 // HOLOTYPE [red label] // ♀”. ( Figs. 9-12 View Figure 9 View Figure 10 View Figure 11 View Figure 12 ) . Paratypes ♂♂ [#34–43; #37, dissected]: same data as holotype, except sex and QR code; collector label missing in some such as in #37 . Non-type specimens ♂♂ [#48, #51, #52], ♀♀ [#44, #49, #50, #53–57]: labeled: “ La Suiza de / Turrialba Jul / COSTA RICA / Pablo Schild // ALMelander / Collection / 1961 // USNMENT / [QR Code] / 013… [back side] // #..”
Comments. Malloch (1924b) listed one male holotype and ten paratypes. Indeed, the type specimen series we received contains 11 specimens; one female labeled “type” and ten males labeled “ paratype ”.
Redescription
♂. (n = 13). Head ( Fig. 13 View Figure 13 ) generally blackish. Frontal length 0.475 (0.39–0.51) mm; frontal index about 1.69 (1.35–1.92), top to bottom width ratio about 1.41 (1.24–1.54). Frontal triangle hardly visible, about 40% of frontal length; ocellar triangle prominent, about 35% of the frontal length. Orbital plates paler grayish, about 60% of frontal length, orbital setae arranged in a row, distance of or3 to or2 about 64% of or3 to or1, distance of or2 to or1 about 36% of or3 to or1, distance of or3 to or1 about 220% of or3 to vtm, or1 / or3 ratio about 1.03 (0.90–1.17), or2 / or1 ratio about 0.76 (0.63–0.86), vt index about 0.89 (0.79–0.95), postocellar setae about 24 (20–29) % of frontal length, ocellar setae about 69 (58–79) % of frontal length; vibrissal index about 0.41 (0.31–0.47). Face blackish. Carina indistinct, short, flat. Cheek linear, narrow, brownish, index about 17 (12–23). Eye roundish, with main axis almost vertical, index about 1.24 (1.14–1.35). Pedicel yellowish, dorsally blackish, flagellomere 1 blackish, length to width ratio about 1.76 (1.38–2.00). Arista has 5-7 dorsal, 5-7 ventral and about 6 small inner branches, plus a short terminal fork. Proboscis brownish. Palpus black, somewhat broader medially.
Thorax ( Fig. 13 View Figure 13 ) generally blackish, length about 1.35 (1.10–1.67) mm. Scutum with about 8 rows of acrostichal setae, one postpronotal seta; dc index about 0.44 (0.33–0.50). Scutellum slightly pointed, distance between apical scutellars about 75% of the apical to the basal one; basal ones divergent, apical ones crossed; scut index about 1.42 (1.25–1.65). Pleura ( Fig. 13b View Figure 13 ) generally blackish but paler towards the lower margin, no distinct horizontal dark stripes visible, sterno index about 0.92 (0.85–1.00). Halter with black knob. Legs ( Fig. 13a,b,d View Figure 13 ) generally blackish, knees and tips of tibiae paler, all tarsi yellowish.
Wing ( Fig.13 View Figure 13 ) generally dark brown, somewhat paler towards the hind margin, m 3 apically slightly bent upwards, length 2.14 (1.82–2.45) mm, length to width ratio about 1.86 (1.54–2.07). Indices: C = 1.85 (1.70–2.00), ac = 9 (7–10), hb = 0.71 (0.64–0.80),4C = 1.32(1.17–1.46), 4v = 1.86 (1.59–2.08), 5x = 1.07 (0.89–1.29), M = 0.59 (0.50–0.69), prox. x = 0.99 (0.83–1.25).
Abdomen ( Fig. 13d View Figure 13 ) shining blackish.
Terminalia ( Figs. 14–16 View Figure 14 View Figure 15 View Figure 16 ). Epandrium microtrichose ( Fig. 14 View Figure 14 ), with 17 (left) or 13 (right) upper and 12 (left) or 18 (right) lower setae; upper setae in two parallel curved rows adjacent to the posterior margin, setae of posterior row longer, lower setae scattered over the ventral region that is neither in a ventral lobe form nor covering the surstylus. Cercus ( Fig. 14b,c View Figure 14 ) reduced to a narrow vertical stripe, setose, not microtrichose, without ventral lobe and anteriorly linked to epandrium by membranous tissue. Surstylus trapezoid-shaped in the lateral view ( Fig. 14a View Figure 14 ), double-walled, outer wall covered with tiny wart-shaped scales and scarcely setose in the lower region, inner wall brush-like, densely covered in the anteromedial area with ca. 40 strong, curved, sharply-tipped setae ( Fig. 14b,d View Figure 14 ), probably functioning as prensisetae which are absent on the inner margin; base of surstylus weakly linked to epandrium by membranous tissue. Decasternum ( Fig. 14c View Figure 14 ) slightly sclerotized, strip shaped. Hypandrium sinuate in lateral view ( Fig.15a View Figure 15 ), triangular in anterior and posterior views, slightly wider than long, as long as the epandrium, anterior margin convex, posterior margin medially concave ( Fig.15b View Figure 15 ); posterior hypandrial process absent; dorsal arch sclerotized, distally sinuate in the anterior and posterior views, laterally perpendicular and widely fused to the posterior hypandrium arms, bearing a deep concavity ( Fig.15b View Figure 15 ), where well-developed surstyli rest, dorsodistally projected forwards as a half pear-shaped tube dorsally sheltering the aedeagus ( Fig. 15a View Figure 15 ); gonopods fused to each other and the posterior margin of the hypandrium, perpendicular to the hypandrium, bare and concave as a shallow pouch ( Fig. 15b View Figure 15 ) where the aedeagus rests. Aedeagus ( Figs. 15 View Figure 15 , 16 View Figure 16 ) relatively small, somewhat spherical, membranous except for two strongly sclerotized anterodorsal curved plates (probably inner paraphyses fused to the aedeagus), covered dorsodistally ( Fig.16a View Figure 16 ) and ventrodistally ( Fig.16e View Figure 16 ) with seta-like scales, which are dorsally shorter and ventrally longer giving a serrate aspect to the margins in the lateral view ( Fig. 16c View Figure 16 ); base of aedeagus linked to the aedeagal apodeme by membranous tissue. Aedeagal apodeme ( Figs. 15 View Figure 15 , 16 View Figure 16 ) long, curved ( Fig.16c View Figure 16 ), rod-shaped, anteriorly expanded dorsoventrally ( Fig. 16c View Figure 16 ), almost three times as long as the aedeagus. Ventral rod submedially (not distally) positioned, strongly sclerotized, crosswise flattened, conspicuously fan-shaped ( Figs. 15b View Figure 15 , 16 View Figure 16 ), distally very wide and linked to the pouched-like gonopods by membranous tissue ( Fig. 15b View Figure 15 ). Outer and inner paraphyses not recognizable, probably either lost or fused to the ventral rod and aedeagus, respectively.
♀. (n = 9). Differences compared to males: No obvious differences in external morphology ( Figs. 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 ). Measurements: Frontal length about 0.42 (0.32–0.46) mm, frontal index about 1.46 (1.19–1.63), top to bottom width ratio about 1.32 (1.21–1.50), or1 / or3 ratio about 1.08 (0.93–1.67), or2 / or1 ratio about 0.81 (0.60–0.93), postocellar setae about 30 (22–35) % of the frontal length, ocellar setae about 79 (70–85) % of the frontal length; vt index about 0.89 (0.79–1.00). vibrissal index about 0.37 (0.32–0.47), Cheek index about 17 (9–24). Eye index about 1.25 (1.18–1.38). Flagellomere 1 ratio about 1.74 (1.63–1.86).
Thorax length about1.28 (0.79–1.60) mm; dc index about0.44 (0.33–0.50), scut index about 1.42 (1.25–1.65), sterno index about 0.92 (0.85–1.00).
Wing length = 2.11 (1.64–2.45) mm.Indices: C index = 1.90 (1.78–2.19), ac = 8 (7–9), hb = 0.69 (0.61–0.77),4C = 1.27 (1.17–1.42), 4v = 1.86 (1.67–2.00), 5x = 1.08 (0.89–1.20), M = 0.56 (0.47–0.67), prox. X = 1.01 (0.86–1.25).
Terminalia (n = 1) ( Fig. 12 View Figure 12 ). One pair of short cerci inserted beyond and between the epiproct and hypoproct.Oviscapt valves absent, sternite 8 (egg guide of Laštovka and Máca, 1982) horizontally positioned, not protruding beyond the hypoproct, and somewhat rectangle-shaped; posterior margin with a deep V-shaped notch conspicuously bordered with 14 short, strongly sclerotized, sharply pointed, peg-shaped ovisensilla in addition to 16 similar ones, arranged somewhat in adjacent line. Spermathecal capsule bulbous, with a long-tailed appendage ( Laštovka and Máca, 1982); height slightly shorter than sternite 8.
Distribution. Costa Rica (Provinces of Alajuela and Cartago)
Biology. Unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegana |
Stegana (Steganina) nigrita Malloch, 1924
Bächli, Gerhard & Vilela, Carlos R. 2022 |
Stegana (Steganina) nigrita
Brake, I. & Bachli, G. 2008: 298 |
Wheeler, M. R. 1981: 31 |
Stegana nigrita
Heed, W. B. 1957: 76 |
Heed, W. B. 1956: 61 |
Malloch, J. R. 1924: 97 |
Malloch, J. R. 1924: 1 |