Serenotheres janus, Ng, Peter K. L. & Meyer, Chistopher, 2016

Ng, Peter K. L. & Meyer, Chistopher, 2016, A new species of pea crab of the genus Serenotheres Ahyong & Ng, 2005 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Pinnotheridae) from the date mussel Leiosolenus Carpenter, 1857 (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Mytilidae, Lithophaginae) from the Solomon Islands, ZooKeys 623, pp. 31-41 : 32-36

Taxon classification Animalia Decapoda Pinnotheridae

Serenotheres janus sp. n. Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Type material.

Holotype ♀ (8.9 × 7.9 mm) (USNM 1421642), in Leiosolenus obesus (Philippi, 1847) ( Mollusca: Bivalvia: Mytilidae : Lithophaginae), from Njari Island, New Georgia, Solomon Islands, station SOLOM_026; 8.01374°S, 156.75649°E, coll. C. Meyer, 9 October, 2014.

Diagnosis.

Carapace distinctly pentagonal; lateral margins of dorsal carapace lamellum distinctly produced with posterolateral part deeply concave, highest at median cleft with 2 halves sloping gently outwards in direct frontal view; rostrum distinct with surface above antennular fossa prominently concave; surfaces of anterolateral margin and hepatic region less prominently pitted, eroded; MXP3 ischiomerus relatively more rectangular; P2 merus relatively long.

Description.

Carapace deep, prismatic, pentagonal in dorsal view, distinctly broader than long; anterior, lateral, and dorsal surfaces pitted (Figs 1B, 2, 3, 5A). Posterior carapace margin wide, with median part gently concave (Figs 1B, 2A, B, 5A). Frontal and antero-dorsal part of carapace raised to form distinct dorsal lamellum (Figs 1, 2, 5A). Dorsal lamellum projecting anteriorly, forming eave which overhangs true frontal margin and orbits; margins thin, glabrous; surface gently concave, regions not clearly defined, gastro-cervical grooves just visible; anterior margin acute, forming a false front, separated into 2 rounded lobes by shallow median cleft; highest at edges of median cleft, with 2 lateral halves sloping gently outwards in direct frontal view (Figs 1B, 2, 3, 4A, B). Dorsal lamellum connected to rostrum by distinct broad, longitudinal median ridge; lateral junction between dorsal lamellum and true anterolateral margin marked by distinct concavity (Figs 3, 4A, B). Surface between dorsal lamellum and true frontal and anterolateral margins deeply concave (Figs 3, 4A, B). True anterolateral margins subcristate, convex, lined with dense, short clavate setae which obscures margins (Figs 2C, 3A, 4B). True frontal margin triangular, separated into 2 low lobes by shallow concavity, lined with dense short clavate setae which completely obscures margin (Figs 3, 5B). Ventral surface of front with 2 pronounced depressions, above antennular fossae, not setose (Figs 3, 5B). Antennular fossae round, margins lined with dense short clavate setae which obscures margins; antennules folding obliquely (Figs 3B, C, 5B). Antenna with proximal 2 articles fused, immovably lodged in epistome; basal article (article 2) large, subrectangular; articles 3-5 increasingly smaller, with flagellum very short, not extending beyond orbit (Fig. 5B). Orbit small, not visible from dorsal view; cornea small, pigmented black, peduncle short; eyes just visible in frontal view (Figs 3B, C, 5B). Subhepatic region with deep, broad, slightly oblique groove, cristae delimiting groove lined with dense, short clavate setae (Figs 3, 5B). Pterygostomial region gently concave, forming shallow oblique groove (Figs 3, 5B). Epistome transversely subrectangular; median part of posterior margin gently concave (Figs 3B, 5B). Buccal cavity wide, margins lined with dense short setae (Fig. 3B, C).

MXP3 inserted obliquely, completely filling buccal cavity; outer surface and margins covered with short clavate setae which obscures structure, setae on longitudinal median part of ischiomerus distinctly less dense (Fig. 3B, C); ischium and merus completely fused without trace of suture; ischiomerus broadly subovate, longer than broad, outer surface with broad, shallow longitudinal sulcus, distal margins convex; palp 2-segmented, inserted on inner surface of ischiomerus, just below distal margin, carpus globose, dactylus conical, subspatulate, longer than carpus, extending beyond inner edge of ischiomerus; exopod elongate with basal part dilated, outer margin distinctly concave, with single elongate segment (Fig. 5C, D).

Chelipeds symmetrical, short, relatively stout, densely covered with dense short clavate setae (Figs 1B, 2C, 3); setae longer, denser on dorsal margin and along 2 longitudinal rows on outer surface of palm and carpus, forming 3 pseudo-ridges (Figs 3B, C, 4D); when denuded, surfaces of carpus and palm smooth (Fig. 6A, B). Dactylus and pollex covered with dense setae, giving fingers short, stout appearance (Figs 3B, C, 4D); when denuded, structures gently curved, tips sharp, crossing distally; cutting edge of dactylus with 1 submedian tooth and small posterior denticles; cutting edge of pollex with small tooth on proximal third, with smaller teeth and posterior denticles (Fig. 6A).

P2-5 (ambulatory legs) symmetrical from left to right, generally similar in form; margins of carpus and propodus lined with dense, long setae, setation on merus less distinct and more spare; dactylus covered with sparse long setae (Figs 1B, 2, 4C, D); relative lengths: P2>P3=P4>P5 (Fig. 6 C–F). Outer surface of merus, carpus and propodus smooth when denuded; merus subovate in cross-section, unarmed (Fig. 6 C–F). P2-P4 dactylus falcate, long, distinctly shorter than propodus, tip gently curved (Fig. 6 C–E); P5 dactylus with distal part prominently curved, with tip hooked obliquely inwards (Fig. 6F).

Abdomen very broad, extending beyond margins of thoracic sternum, partially covering bases of P1-P4, reaching bases of MXP3 (Figs 1C, 4D); somites 1-6 and telson free; somite 4 broadest; telson broadly triangular with rounded tip (Figs 4C, D, 5E); margins lined with dense short setae which obscures margins; surface pitted, appears eroded; surface of somites 4-6 and telson concave, pits and depression on surface more prominent, with margins and edges of sutures of these somites cristate (Figs 4C, D, 5E).

Colour.

In life, the species is cream-yellow overall (Fig. 1).

Etymology.

The species is named after Janus, the ancient two-faced Roman god, alluding to the unusual two parts of the carapace when viewed dorsally. The name is used as a noun in apposition.

Remarks.

Serenotheres janus sp. n. can be separated from Serenotheres besutensis ( Serène, 1967) in having the lateral margins of the dorsal carapace lamellum distinctly produced laterally to form a blunt angular lobe, with the posterolateral margin deeply concave (Figs 2, 5A) (vs. lateral margin not produced laterally and more rounded, with the posterolateral margin gently sinuous to almost straight in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Serène 1967: pl. 2A; Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5A); the dorsal carapace lamellum is highest at the median cleft, with the two halves sloping gently outwards in direct frontal view (albeit with the margins of the cleft curving downwards) (Fig. 3) (vs. dorsal carapace lamellum is lowest at the median cleft, with the two halves sloping gently inwards in direct frontal view in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Serène 1967: pl. 2B; Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5E); the rostrum is more prominent with the surface above the antennular fossa prominently concave (Figs 3B, C, 5B) (vs. rostrum relatively shorter with the region above the antennular fossa more shallow in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5A, C, D, E); the surface of the actual anterolateral margin and hepatic region is less prominently pitted and eroded (Figs 3, 5B) (vs. prominently pitted and eroded in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Serène, 1967: pl. 2B; Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5C, D); the MXP3 ischiomerus is relatively more rectangular in form (Fig. 5C, D) (vs. longitudinally ovate in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Serène 1967: fig. 5; Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5K); and the P2 merus is relatively longer (Fig. 6C) (vs. relatively shorter in Serenotheres besutensis , cf. Ahyong and Ng 2005: fig. 5G).

The type of Serenotheres besutensis (9.0 × 7.0 mm) (cf. Ng and Ahyong 2005) is similar to that of the holotype of Serenotheres janus sp. n. (8.9 × 7.9 mm), so the differences observed cannot be explained by size.

The DNA barcode sequence data of Serenotheres janus sp. n. indicates a novel lineage among available Pinnotheridae sequences. The closest matches are 86-85% in sequence similarity to a handful of other pinnotherid genera including Zaops , Calyptraeotheres , Austinotheres , and Pinnixa (see Palacios-Theil et al. 2009; Palacios Theil et al. 2016). To date, no other closely related species has been sequenced.

Lithophagine mussels bore into coral rock and until recently, only one species of pinnotherid crab has been reported: Serenotheres besutensis from an unidentified species of Lithophaga collected in live coral from an island off the northeast coast of Peninsular Malaysia ( Serène 1967). Serenotheres janus sp. n. was collected from inside a large specimen of Leiosolenus obesus (Philippi, 1847) (Fig. 1A). The function of the unusual plates and lamellum is not known.