Sennius bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:27F01A0C-47D4-4B0B-BE96-B0D66F2DC381 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5465553 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C421D67B-7E15-FFB2-5ACA-FB1EBF3AFC83 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sennius bicoloripes (Pic, 1930) |
status |
|
Sennius bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)
Bruchus bicoloripes Pic, 1930a:37 (description, distribution); Bondar, 1936: 40 (diagnosis, host, distribution); Zacher, 1952: 472 (host), 461 (erroneous host association, conflated with Merobruchus bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)) .
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri & Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).
Sennius bicoloripes: Kingsolver & Silva, 1991: 413 (combination, citation).
Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis Pic, 1930a:37 (description). New Synonymy.
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri & Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).
Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes Pic, 1930a:37 (description). New Synonymy.
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Blackwelder, 1946: 758 (combination, catalog); Udayagiri & Wadhi, 1989: 39 (catalog).
Type material (7, MNHN): Bruchus bicoloripes: Two syntypes with labels: 1, “ Brazil . / Bahia. / 1929. / Dr. G Bondar. / On wild / Leguminous / plant / 322.” “ type ” “ bicoloripes / Pic ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ Bruchus / bicoloripes / Pic / det. / J.M.Kingsolver ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ ♀ ” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J.H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Brazil . / Bahia. / 1929./ Dr. G Bondar. / On wild / Leguminous / plant / 322.” “ bicoloripes / Pic ” “ Paratype ” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”.
Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Two syntypes deposited with labels: 1, “Serra de / <illegible letters>” “ type ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ var. indiversipes / Pic” “ Bruchus Pic / bicoloripes / v. indiversipes / det. J.M.Kinsolver” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”; 1, “Bruch 1907” “ Brasilien / Nova Teutônia / Fritz Plaumann” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana”.
Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Three syntypes with labels: 1, “ Jatahy / Prov. Goyas . Brésil ” “ type ” “ HOLOTYPE ” “ v. jatayensis / Pic” “G117” “ Bruchus / bicoloripes / v. jatayensis / Pic / det. / J.M.Kingsolver ” “Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Jatahy / Prov. Goyas . Brésil / Sept. A Nov. 97 ” “ PARATYPE ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014” “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”; 1, “ Jatahy / Prov . Goyas. Brési / Dec. 97 – Janv. 98” “ PARATYPE ” “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic” “ Sennius bicoloripes / (Pic, 1930) / det J. H. Viana 2014”. “ Syntype / Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis / Pic, 1930 / J. H. Viana ”.
Remark. Bruchus bicoloripes: Two females were received from the MNHN. In the original descriptions, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the two specimens are identical and the locality data match what is given in the original description (Brésil) and Pic’s handwritten label " bicoloripes Pic ", but only one specimen is labeled "type". Here both specimens are considered as syntypes.
Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes: Two females were received from the MNHN. In the original descriptions, Pic does not indicate the number of specimens studied. The labels of the two specimens are identical, the locality data are the same as quoted in the original description (Brésil), and both are in Pic’s handwritten label " var. indiversipes Pic "; but only one specimen has the label "type". Here both specimens were considered as syntypes and also the variety B. bicoloripes var. indiversipes (NEW SYNONYM) is synonymized with Bruchus bicoloripes .
Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis: Three females were received from the MNHN. Here the three specimens are treated as syntypes and B. bicoloripes var. jatayensis (NEW SYNONYM) is synonymized with Bruchus bicoloripes .
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sennius bicoloripes (Pic, 1930)
Viana, Jéssica Herzog 2016 |
Sennius bicoloripes:
Kingsolver 1991: 413 |
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes:
Udayagiri 1989: 39 |
Blackwelder 1946: 758 |
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. jatayensis:
Udayagiri 1989: 39 |
Blackwelder 1946: 758 |
Acanthoscelides bicoloripes var. indiversipes:
Udayagiri 1989: 39 |
Blackwelder 1946: 758 |
Bruchus bicoloripes
Zacher 1952: 472 |
Bondar 1936: 40 |
Pic 1930: 37 |
Bruchus bicoloripes var. jatayensis
Pic 1930: 37 |
Bruchus bicoloripes var. indiversipes
Pic 1930: 37 |