Scrobipalpa ferruginosa ( Povolný, 2001 )

BIDZILYA, OLEKSIY, HUEMER, PETER & ŠUMPICH, JAN, 2022, Taxonomy and faunistics of the genus Scrobipalpa Janse, 1951 (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) in southern Siberia, Zootaxa 5218 (1), pp. 1-76 : 26-27

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5218.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FABDED0F-E373-479B-BA18-0E3E9373E737
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7409993
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03808790-CE28-4927-A7E2-FC79FBC0FC8B
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Scrobipalpa ferruginosa ( Povolný, 2001 )
status

Treatment

Scrobipalpa ferruginosa ( Povolný, 2001) View in CoL

Figs 45, 46 View Figures 41–50 , 103 View Figures 103–106 , 148–150 View Figures 148–150

Euscrobipalpa ferruginosa Povolný 2001: 187 View in CoL .

Scrobipalpa ferruginosa (Povolný) View in CoL : Ponomarenko 2008: 4.

Euscrobipalpa pinosa Povolný, 2001: 194 View in CoL . Syn. nov.

Type material examined. Holotype of E. ferruginosa ♀, [ Russia] Zabaikalie , okr. s. Nizhniy Tsasutchei , Sosnovyi Bor , svet, 1.vii.1997 (A. Bidzilya, I. Kostjuk & O. Kostjuk) (gen. slide Bdz. 8, D. Povolný) ( ZMKU); holotype of E. pinosa ♀, [ Russia] Zabaikalie , okr. s. Nizhniy Tsasutchei, Sosnovyi Bor, svet, 1.vii.1997 (A. Bidzilya, I. Kostjuk & O. Kostjuk) (gen. slide Bdz. 50, Povolný) ( ZMKU).

Material examined. 1 ♀, same data as for holotype of E. ferruginosa (gen. slide 163/08, OB) ; 1 ♂, [ Russia] Zabaikalie , Chita, 26.vii.1997 (Bidzilya, I. Kostjuk & O. Kostjuk) (gen. slide 202/15, OB) (all ZMKU) ; 1 ♂, Russia, S-Buryatia, 51°11-13’N, 106°10-12’E, 700 m, Hamar-Daban Mts , Murtoi river, Gusinoe Ozero vill. 6 km NW, forest steppe, 19.vi.2002 (Nupponen) (gen. slide 290/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28317 [failed]) ( NUPP) . 1 ♂, Mongolia, Gobi Altaj aimak, chasat chajrchan ul Gebirge cca 20 km S von Somon Zargalan, 2400 m, Exp. Dr. Z. Kazsab, 1966, 15.vii.1966 (gen. slide 293/19, OB) ( HNHM) .

Diagnosis. Scrobipalpa ferruginosa is defined externally by the light brown forewing with a dark costal margin and ochreous-brown head ( Figs 45, 46 View Figures 41–50 ). The male genitalia are characterised by the comparatively short and narrow weakly curved inwardly sacculus in combination with the nearly parallel-sided saccus, and cucullus distinctly broadened apically ( Fig. 103 View Figures 103–106 ). Scrobipalpa alterna Falkovitsh & Bidzilya, 2006 and S. lutea Povolný, 1977 are somewhat similar but the saccus is weakly curved inwardly, the vincular process is shorter and the cucullus is not broadened apically. The female genitalia of S. ferruginosa ( Figs 148–150 View Figures 148–150 ) are similar to those of S. pseudolutea Piskunov, 1990 and S. pauperella (Heinemann, 1870) , but slightly differ in the shorter sternite VIII and shape of the signum.

Male genitalia ( Fig.103 View Figures 103–106 ). Uncus slightly longer than broad, weakly narrowed apically, posterior margin rounded; gnathos short, slightly curved; tegumen elongate, with broadly rounded anteromedial emargination extending to 1/4 as broad as cucullus, weakly narrowed posteriorly, with inwardly curved short tip; vinculum twice as broad as long, with V-shaped posteromedial emargination, vincular process subtriangular with outwardly curved tip, as broad at base as sacculus; saccus narrow, distal portion nearly parallel-sided, weakly extending beyond top of pedunculus; distal portion of phallus straight, with weakly pointed apex, apical arm narrow, weakly sinuate, caecum about as broad and half as long as phallic tube.

Molecular data. No barcode available.

Distribution. Russia: Buryatia (new record), Zabaikalskiy krai ( Povolný 2001: 187); Mongolia (new record).

Remark 1. Euscrobipalpa ferruginosa was described from a single specimen ( Fig. 45 View Figures 41–50 ) collected in the vicinity of Nizhniy Tsasutchey village, Zabaikalskiy krai, Russia. The holotype proved to be female (frenulum consisting of three acanthae), its genitalia were erroneously placed under the male paratype of S. bidzilyai , whereas the male genitalia of the latter species were assigned to S. ferruginosa and figured in the original description ( Povolný 2001: 186, fig. 7). The female genitalia of the holotype of ferruginosa which were treated as a female of S. bidzilya ( Povolný 2001: 185, fig. 5), are conspecific with the holotype of S. pinosa ( Fig. 149 View Figures 148–150 ), which was described from a single female ( Fig. 46 View Figures 41–50 ) collected sympatrically with S. ferruginosa . The holotype of S. pinosa is also indistinguishable from the holotype of S. ferruginosa ( Fig. 45 View Figures 41–50 ). Both species were described in the same paper, on page 187 ( S. ferruginosa ) and on page 194 ( S. pinosa ). Hence we consider here S. pinosa ( Povolný, 2001) a syn. nov. of S. ferruginosa ( Povolný, 2001) .