Schistoneurus subimpressus, Jaschhof, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.953.2649 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8F69D11D-3C9A-4468-A354-7D2F7A84DAEB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13750032 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/88CE3BC6-3B59-4073-B8B6-A2A365D0AF4B |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:88CE3BC6-3B59-4073-B8B6-A2A365D0AF4B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Schistoneurus subimpressus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Schistoneurus subimpressus sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:88CE3BC6-3B59-4073-B8B6-A2A365D0AF4B
Fig. 30 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
Morphology
The single male described here as S. subimpressus sp. nov. differs from S. paraimpressus sp. nov. in having shorter flagellomeral necks (the neck-to-node ratio in the fourth flagellomere is 1.5 in S. subimpressus ( Fig. 30C View Fig ) versus 2.0 in S. paraimpressus ( Fig. 29C View Fig )) and in the construction of the gonostylus, of which the particulars are as follows. The gonostylus of S. subimpressus ( Fig. 30B View Fig ) is more compact; the thick black spines cover a markedly smaller area apically and apicomedially; the inside is less sharply separated from the outside (note the sharp longitudinal edge with black spines in S. paraimpressus , Fig. 29B View Fig ); and the ventral protrusion bears not just ordinary setae but a small cluster of black spines. The two species might also differ in body length (1.7 mm in S. subimpressus versus 2.2 mm in S. paraimpressus ), but this difference, derived from a small specimen sample, should be taken with caution considering the size variation described for S. impressus (1.7‒2.0 mm, Jaschhof & Jaschhof 2013). Larvae and females of the new species are unknown.
DNA barcode
The CO1 sequence (653bp) of the holotype specimen is available in BIN BOLD:AEO6709. Search on BOLDʼs BIN Database retrieved no further result for this BIN (accessed 27 Aug. 2023).
Etymology
The name ‒ the Latin prefix ‘ sub -’ means, in a broad sense, ‘beside’ ‒ is an allusion to the morphological similarity of this species to S. impressus .
Type material
Holotype
GERMANY • ♂; Bavaria, Lower Franconia, Rimpar ; 49°87′32″ N, 9°93′24″ E; elev. 272 m; 12 Jul. 2019; LandKlif and J. Müller leg.; Malaise trap; BOLD GBDTA10171-21 ; ZSM-DIP-42306-A06 .
GoogleMapsNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |