Rubus cryptopetalus A.Beek, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.515.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8067189 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE3646-FF98-FFC5-FF43-FA6AFEADFCD3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus cryptopetalus A.Beek |
status |
sp. nov. |
7. Rubus cryptopetalus A.Beek View in CoL sp. nov.
Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. KwaZulu-Natal: Road from Vryheid to Louwsburg , 3.1 km before the exit to Louwsburg , south side of the road, 14 February 2018, Beek 2018.07 (holotype L; isotype NBG). ( Figs 5C–D View FIGURE 5 )
Diagnosis: —Primocane very densely greyish brown hairy; adaxially hairy, abaxially densely soft hairy, often tomentose, green or greyish; central leaflet narrow ovate or (ob-)ovate, with rounded or emarginate base, gradually attenuate into rather long tip; inflorescence dense; petals whitish or pinkish, 2–3 mm long.
Primocane ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ) arching or scrambling, roundish to bluntly angular, diam. 5–9 mm, very densely greyish brown hairy, with stellate hairs; prickles 7–25 per 5 cm, unequal, subulate or compressed, with curved tip, up to 2–4 mm long; stipules 7–11 mm, linear, hairy. Leaves pinnate 5- to 7-foliolate, adaxially hairy ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ), abaxially densely soft hairy, often tomentose, green or greyish; serrature with (rather) fine roundish short mucronate teeth, often double, with 2–5 teeth compound into unit; petiole 2.5–7.0 cm long, with 4–7 short, thick, curved, conic or somewhat compressed prickles, densely short hairy; central leaflet 48–82 mm long, narrow ovate or (ob-)ovate, with rounded or emarginate base, gradually attenuate into rather long tip, width–length index 0.56–0.59, length of petiolule 12–23% of length of leaflet; petiolule between lowest yokes 2–4 cm, petiolule of lowest leaflets 2–4 mm. Flowering branch ( Fig. 5G View FIGURE 5 ) obtuse angular, very dense short hairy; prickles unequal, subulate or from 1–4 mm broad base bluntly compressed, with curved tip, up to 3–5 mm long. Leaves ( Fig. 5H View FIGURE 5 ) pinnate 5- to 7-foliolate; serrature with (rather) fine roundish short mucronate teeth, often double, with 2–5 teeth compound into unit; central leaflet 44–75 mm long, elliptic-obovate, with attenuate to subemarginate base, gradually to rather abruptly attenuate into moderate tip, width–length index 0.52–0.67, length of petiolule 12–22% of length of leaflet. Inflorescence short pyramidal, with leafy base, very densely short hairy, with thick curved prickles; peduncles ascending, apical ones almost patent, basal with 5–20 flowers; pedicels 5–10 mm, densely tomentose, with 2–10 pricklets. Flowers: sepals ( Fig. 5I View FIGURE 5 ) narrow, long pointed, 2–3 × 6–9 mm, clasping, grey, densely tomentose, with few subsessile glands and often some prickles; petals whitish or pale pink, very small, 2–3 mm; anthers glabrous; ovaries glabrous or with few hairs on tip becoming glabrous; receptacle with few hairs.
Ecology: —Roadsides, hedges, light woods.
Distribution: — KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape, South Africa. How far the distribution spreads northward is not clear. Some plants from Mpumalanga correspond rather with R. adolfi-friedericii as Gustafsson (1934) already remarked.
Note: — Harvey & Sonder (1862: 288) consider the possibility that Ecklon & Zeyher 1707, which is a specimen of R. cryptopetalus , might be a separate species, but they leave this open, presenting it as a doubtful species.
Specimens:— SOUTH AFRICA. Mpumalanga: Buffelskloof Nature Reserve, near zig-zag road, 28 May 2019, Magoele 2919 (PRE0863891-0); High Forest entrance road, Uitkyk Plantations, 1785 m, 2 May 1985, Burrows 4644 (BNRH0010128-1); Dullstroom, Lydenburg District, Drews 186, (PRE); Pilgrimsrest District, Mariepskop, 1400 m, 12 January 1964, Bos 1081 (PRE). KwaZulu-Natal: Utrecht District, Donkerhoek, 21 January 1961, Devenish 530 (PRE0458414-0); Richmond, 7 December 1961, Maree 28 (PRE); Kokstad, Insizwa, 22 February 1972, Strey 10731 (PRE). Eastern Cape: Nieuwepost ad Katrivier, Ecklon & Zeyher 1707 (‘ R. rigidus Sm ?’) (BREM, inserted as R. ecklonii ; NBG).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |