Rothilena cochimi, Maya-Morales, Julieta & Jiménez, María Luisa, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3718.5.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6B4978C-06CB-4746-A6A5-C502F7483C04 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5658746 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E36C665C-FFF9-FFB4-FF54-9E5CFAE1968D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rothilena cochimi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rothilena cochimi View in CoL new species
Figures 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 , 20, 21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 , 32–41 View FIGURES 32 – 35 View FIGURES 36 – 41
Type. Male (Holotype): MEXICO: Baja California Sur, Municipality of Comondú, San José de Comondú, collected by pitfall trap, 26°03′34″N, 111°49′13″W, 300 m, 15.XII.2002, A. Trujano and G. Nieto (CARCIB 1906), deposited at CARCIB.
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the extant ethnic native American group named “ Cochimí ” of the Baja California Peninsula.
Diagnosis. Males are readily diagnosable from R. griswoldi and R. pilar by having the basal part of RTA with a rounded anterior margin ( Figs. 32, 34 View FIGURES 32 – 35 ). Females can be distinguished from R. pilar by the copulatory ducts with tips directed laterally ( Figs. 38, 39 View FIGURES 36 – 41 ), from R. griswoldi by having the hoods covering less than half the epigynum plate length ( Figs. 36, 37 View FIGURES 36 – 41 ), from R. golondrina by having the hoods with mesal margin straight ( Figs. 36, 37 View FIGURES 36 – 41 ) and from R. sudcaliforniensis and R. naranjensis by having the spurs not exceeding the epigastric furrow in ventral view ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 36 – 41 ).
Description. Male (Holotype): Coloration. Prosoma with a black band around the border of thoracic region. Two longitudinal symmetric darkener bands on carapace, intensified by brown plumose hairs. Black spot in ocular region. Chelicerae dark orange with a diffuse spot, condyles dark orange covered by clypeus. Endites and labium yellowish with white tips. Sternum yellowish with a diffuse black border. Three black and diffuse rings in femur. Opisthosoma light brown with a black spot at anterior dorsum with two lateral white bands and two longitudinal black bands with three pairs of black spots in the posterior part. Basal segment of posterior lateral spinnerets with black spots. Habitus. Total length 4.76. Carapace length 2.88, width 1.75, cephalic region width 0.9, ocular region width 0.52. Eye rows strongly procurved. Eye diameter: 0.12. Distance between eyes: AME-AME 0.04, AME- ALE 0.08, AME-PME 0.12, ALE-PLE 0.04, ALE-ALE 0.25, PME-PME 0.08, PME-PLE 0.08. Clypeus height 0.13. Chelicerae: basal segment length 0.97, fang length 0.38. Labium wider than long (0.38/0.29). Endites convergent (distance at their base compared with that at their tips 0.48/0.13). Sternum longer than wide (1.3/1.18). Opisthosoma longer than wide (2.48/1.86). Anterior lateral spinnerets separated by more of their basal diameter (0.25/0.19), posterior lateral spinnerets with distal segment longer than basal segment (0.44/0.35). Legs. Relation prosoma/patella-tibia I: 2.88/3.38. Legs length: I—femur 3.33/ patella-tibia 3.38/ metatarsus 3.08/ tarsus 2.05; II— 2.76/ 3.29/ 3.05/ 1.9; III—2.9/ 3.14/ 3.33/ 1.76; IV—3.81/ 3.95/ 4.76/ 1.95. Spination. Femur dorsal I—1-1 -2-2/ II—1-2 -1-2/ III—1-2 -1-2/ IV—1-1 -1-2; patella dorsal I—1-1 -1/ II—1-2 -1/ III—1-2 -1/ IV—1-2 -1; tibia I—dorsal 1-2-1/ ventral 2-2-2/ prolateral 0-1-0/ retrolateral 0; II—2-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0; III—1-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0-1-0; IV—1-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0-1-0; metatarsus I—0/ 2-2-1/ 0-1-1/ 0-1-0; II—2-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0; III—3-1 -2/ 2-2-2/ 0-1-1/ 0-1-1; IV—3-2 -2/ 2-1-2-2/ 0/ 0-0-1. Number of trichobothria in tarsus: I—6, II—6, III—5, IV—2. Pedipalp ( Figs. 20, 21 View FIGURES 16 – 21 , 32–35 View FIGURES 32 – 35 ). Embolus sinuous. Conductor with distal and ectal projections rounded. Basal part of RTA with rounded anterior margin. Basal part of RTA with a sharp tip and a straight anterior margin. Number of spines: femur 2, patella 2, tibia 4. Cymbium length 0.96, width 0.58.
Female (paratype from the type locality) (CARCIB 1904): Coloration. Similar to male but darker ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). Chelicerae and labium reddish, condyles yellowish. Sternum yellowish with diffuse black spots at sides. Legs darker than in male with spots present in patella and tibia also ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). Spots in posterior lateral spinnerets extend into distal segment. Habitus. Total length 7.5. Carapace length 2.88, width 1.88, cephalic region width 0.95, ocular region width 0.57. Eye rows strongly procurved. Eye diameter: AME, PME and PLE 0.12, ALE 0.13. Distance between eyes: AME-AME 0.08, AME-ALE 0.08, AME-PME 0.12, ALE-PLE 0.06, ALE-ALE 0.29, PME-PME 0.08, PME-PLE 0.1. Clypeus height 0.15. Chelicerae: basal segment length 1.1, fang length 0.48. Labium wider than long (0.43/0.33). Endites convergent (distance at their base compared with that at their tips 0.48/0.24). Sternum longer than wide (1.43/1.19). Opisthosoma longer than wide (4/2.25). Anterior lateral spinnerets separated by slightly less their basal diameter (0.27/0.29), posterior lateral spinnerets with distal segment longer than basal segment (0.71/0.5). Legs. Relation prosoma/patella-tibia I: 2.88/3.19. Legs length: I—femur 2.67/ patella-tibia 3.19/ metatarsus 2.48/ tarsus 1.67; II—2.57/ 3.05/ 2.43/ 1.48; III—2.62/ 2.9/ 2.67/ 1.24; IV—3.14/ 4/ 3.9/ 1.43. Spination. Femur dorsal I—1-1 -1-2/ II—2-2 -2-2/ III—1-1 -2-3/ IV—1-1 -1-3; patella dorsal I—1-1 -1/ II—1-2 -1/ III—1-2 -1/ IV—1-2 -1; tibia I—dorsal 1-1-0/ ventral 1-2-2/ prolateral 1-1-0/ retrolateral 0; II—1-1 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0; III—1-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0; IV—1-2 -1/ 1-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0-1-0; metatarsus I—0/ 2-2-2/ 0-1-0/ 0-1-0; II—0/ 2-2-2/ 0- 1-1/ 0-1-1; III—3-1 -0/ 2-2-2/ 0-1-1/ 0-1-1; IV—3-2 -2/ 1-2-2-2/ 0/ 0-0-1. Number of trichobothria in tarsus: I—5, II—5, III—4, IV—1. Pedipalp. Number of dorsal spines: femur 2, patella 2, tibia 5. Epigynum ( Figs. 36–41 View FIGURES 36 – 41 ). Hoods cover less than half of atrium with posterior part wider than anterior, copulatory ducts separated by less their width, spermathecae separated by their width and adjacent to ventral margin in posterior view. Plate wider than long (0.85/0.56).
Variation. Total body length in males varies between 4.38 and 5.63 (n = 4) and in females between 6.38 and 8.25 (n = 3). Male prosoma length varies between 2.5 and 2.88 (n = 4) and in females between 2.88 and 4.13 (n = 3). Patella-tibia I length in males varies between 3.75 and 3.88 (n = 3) and in females between 3.19 and 4.38 (n = 3).
Additional material examined. Paratypes: MEXICO: Baja California Sur, Municipality of Comondú, same locality of holotype, 1 ♀ by hand collecting in ground, 25.XI.2002, M. Correa (CARCIB 1905); 1 ♂ by pitfall trap, 25.XI.2002, C. Palacios and M. Lobato (CARCIB 1907); 1 ♀ by night collecting in ground, 9.II.2003, G. Nieto (CARCIB 1904); 1 ♂ by night collecting in ground, 10.X.2003, I. Posada (CARCIB 1908); 1 ♂ by pitfall trap, 11.X.2003, I. Posada (CARCIB 1909); 1 ♀ by hand collecting in ground, 26°03′45″N, 111°48′18″W, 317 m, 2.XI.2012, C. Palacios, J. Maya and B. Rocha (CARCIB 3614).
Natural History. One female was captured and kept under observation at the laboratory, where it made four egg sacs over a period of 100 days; gestation time of the eggs was around 45 days. When we fed the female with prey, such as Tenebrio molitor larvae, the spider ran to it, bit it, and carried it to site near the shelter to feed on it later. In the case of smaller and faster prey, such as ants, the spider moved around it and immobilized it with silk thread before attempting to bite it. After emergence, juveniles wove a simple sheet-web, and after the second molt (30–45 days after birth), they started to weave the characteristic funnel-shape retreat. Juveniles also immobilize ants with silk thread before biting.
Habitat. The specimens were collected in an oasis dominated by Prosopis articulata (velvet mesquite, mesquite amargo), Vallesia glabra (pearlberry, otatave), Cercidium microphyllum (palo verde) and citruses (Wiggins 1980, Rebman & Roberts 2012).
Distribution. San José de Comondú, Municipality of Comondú, Baja California Sur, Mexico ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |