Pseudonannolene meridionalis Silvestri, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.867.2109 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DEF295C-A8B1-4A6B-B873-B30949F64E07 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7907899 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F887BA-1304-B159-4D53-FD89FE2F51B6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pseudonannolene meridionalis Silvestri, 1902 |
status |
|
Pseudonannolene meridionalis Silvestri, 1902 View in CoL
Figs 92 View Fig , 185 View Fig
Pseudonannolene meridionalis Silvestri, 1902: 22 View in CoL .
Pseudonannolene cf. meridionalis View in CoL – Mauriès 1987: 173 (description of male topotype). Pseudonannolene meridionalis View in CoL – Jeekel 2004: 89. — Gallo & Bichuette 2020: 36.
Diagnosis
Males of P. meridionalis resemble those of P. centralis and P. typica by having a short ectal process on the solenomere, separated from the apicomesal process by a shallow notch. Pseudonannolene meridionalis differs by having gonocoxa enlarged basally, and internal branch without torsion ( Fig. 92C–D View Fig ).
Etymology
Although unspecified, the name is probably referring to the geographical distribution of the species in southern South America.
Material examined (total: 2 ♂♂, 10 ♀♀, 1 immature)
ARGENTINA – Buenos Aires • 1 ♂, 10 ♀♀, 1 immature; Buenos Aires ; [-34.638212, -58.470722]; 25 m a.s.l.; 5 Jun. 1947; Exp. Galathea leg.; NHMD GoogleMaps .
URUGUAY – Colonia • 1 ♂; Barra del Rosario ; [-34.455863, -57.824967]; 26 m a.s.l.; 12 Jun. 1960; L.C. de Zolessi leg.; FCE 219 GoogleMaps .
Descriptive notes
MEASUREMENTS. 57–58 body rings (2 apodous + telson). Males: body length 45 mm; maximum midbody diameter 2.5 mm. Females: body length 45–48 mm; maximum midbody diameter 2.5 mm.
COLOR. Body color faded, but apparently prozonites brownish, metazonites with a posterior brown band; head, collum, antennae, and legs lighter brown.
HEAD. Antennae short, just reaching back to end of ring 5 when extended dorsally; relative antennomere lengths 1<2<3>4≈5≈6>7. Mandibular cardo with ventral margin narrow. Ommatidial cluster well-developed, elliptical; ca 26 ommatidia in 5 rows.
BODY RINGS. Collum with lateral lobes rounded, with ca 7 shallow striae, slightly curved ectad. Very faintly constricted between prozonite and metazonite; prozonites smooth; metazonites laterally with transverse striae below ozopore. Anterior sterna in midbody rings subrectangular, without transverse striae. FIRST LEG-PAIR OF MALES. Coxae (cx) short, subtriangular, with the base arched, densely setose mainly on distal region ( Fig. 92A View Fig ); prefemoral process (prf) short (less than half of prefemur), subcylindrical, densely setose up to its median region.
SECOND LEG-PAIR OF MALES. Coxa (cx) subrectangular; penis (pn) located at proximal region, rounded, not extended basally ( Fig. 92B View Fig ); prefemur compressed dorsoventrally; remaining podomeres setose.
GONOPODS. Gonocoxa (gcx) subtriangular, basally expanded and progressively less wide, with the base arched; antero-posteriorly flattened ( Fig. 92C–D View Fig ); with rows of papillae mesally. Seminal groove (sg) curved; arising medially on mesal cavity and terminating apically on the seminal apophysis (sa). Shoulder (sh) short, rounded. Telopodite (tp) almost as wide as gcx ( Fig. 92C–D View Fig ); solenomere (sl) with apicomesal process (amp) short, slightly rounded; ectal process (ep) short, subtriangular, separating from amp by shallow notch; sa located at mesal portion, slightly visible apically. Internal branch (ib) subtriangular, narrow, surrounding only basally tp as a shield; without torsion; ib with short setae along its entire margin slightly exceeding apically seminal region of sl.
VULVAE. Not examined.
Distribution
The species occurs in the grasslands of the Río de la Plata basin, from the eastern region of Argentina up to the southern Uruguay ( Fig. 185 View Fig ).
Comments
The type material described by Silvestri (1902) from Tandil, Argentina, was not found. Nevertheless, topotypes deposited at the NHMD and FCE were examined ( Fig. 92 View Fig ), including those described by Mauriès (1987: 173).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudonannolene meridionalis Silvestri, 1902
Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti, Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador & Brescovit, Antonio Domingos 2023 |
Pseudonannolene cf. meridionalis
Gallo J. S. & Bichuette M. E. 2020: 36 |
Jeekel C. A. W. 2004: 89 |
Mauries J-P. 1987: 173 |
Pseudonannolene meridionalis
Silvestri F. 1902: 22 |