Pseudolatirus bilineatus ( Naumann, 1852 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5470.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6A4270C2-D3F9-404F-91E7-4A73F2A99AE4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/36508782-FFFB-DB11-3288-71670F76FE05 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus ( Naumann, 1852 ) |
status |
|
Pseudolatirus bilineatus ( Naumann, 1852) View in CoL
Figs 2Q View FIGURE 2 , 4N View FIGURE4 , 26A–C View FIGURE 26
[ Fusus View in CoL ] bilineatus Part. View in CoL — Hauer 1837: 418 (pars) [nomen nudum].
[ Fusus View in CoL ] bilineatus Partsch View in CoL — Hörnes 1848: 19 (pars) [nomen nudum].
* Fusus bilineatus View in CoL — Naumann 1852: plate captions, pl. 70, fig. 7.
Fusus bilineatus Partsch View in CoL — Naumann 1854: 1066.
Fusus bilineatus Partsch View in CoL —Hörnes 1853: 295 (pars) [non pl. 32, figs 11–12 = Pseudofusus stahlschmidti nov. sp.].
Fusus bilineatus —Quenstedt 1884: 601, pl. 209, fig. 10.
Fasciolaria bilineata Partsch — Handmann 1888: 18, pl. 2, fig. 24.
Fasciolaria bilineata Partsch —Hoernes & Auinger 1890: 264 (pars).
Dolicholathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch) — Cossmann 1901: 24, pl. 2, figs 11–12.
Latirus (Pseudolatirus) bilineatus (Ptsch.) View in CoL — Boettger 1902: 38.
Lathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch) — Boettger 1906: 49.
Fasciolaria bilineata Partsch — Schaffer 1908: 109, pl. 2, fig. 10.
Dolicholathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus Partsch – Peyrot 1928: 55, pl. 6, figs 10–11.
Lathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch) — Sieber 1937: 132.
Lathyrus View in CoL (Dolicolathyrus [sic]) bilineatus (Partsch) — Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 408, pl. 7, figs 40–41, pl. 8, figs 3–6. L [athyrulus]. (P [seudolatirus].) bilineatus (Partsch) — Sieber 1958: 152.
Latirus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch) View in CoL — Báldi 1960: 75.
Latirus (Dolicholatirus) bilineatus Partsch 1856 View in CoL —Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960: 188, pl. 46, figs 2a–b. Latirus (Pseudolatirus) bilineatus (Partsch) von Hauer View in CoL , sp. 1837— Glibert 1963: 131.
Latirus (Dolicholatirus) bilineatus Partsch View in CoL (in Hauer), 1837— Strausz 1966: 350, pl. 28, figs 4–13.
Lathyrus (Dolicholathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch) — Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 30: pl. 13, figs 1–2.
Latirus (Pseudolatirus) bilineatus (Partsch) View in CoL — Schultz 1998: 68, pl. 27, fig. 5.
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (M. Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL — Snyder 1999: 6.
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes) View in CoL — Stahlschmidt & Fraussen, 2012: 86, figs 19–20 [non figs 21–22 = Pseudofusus stahlschmidti nov. sp.].
Latirus bilineatus View in CoL (Partsch in Hauer, 1837)— Popa et al. 2014: 13, pl. 4, fig. 1.
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (M. Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL — Lozouet 2015: 31, pl. 10, figs 1–4, pl. 11, fig. 9.
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL — Kantor et al. 2018: 16, figs 3F [non fig. 3G = Pseudofusus stahlschmidti nov. sp.].
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL — Kovács 2022: 80, figs 47–48.
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL — Kovács & Vicián 2023: 236, fig. 6P.
non Pseudolathyrus bilineatus (Partsch) — Sacco 1904: 26, pl. 7, fig. 31–32 [= Fusininae indet.].
Type material. Neotype: NHMW 1846/0037/0264e, SL: 37.8 mm, MD: 11.2 mm, Möllersdorf ( Austria), Figs 4N View FIGURE4 , 26A View FIGURE 26 1 –A View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . The status of the type of this species is complex. Stahlschmidt & Fraussen (2012: 86) designated specimen NHMW 1846/0037/0263 from Möllersdorf ( Austria) as lectotype ( Stahlschmidt & Fraussen, 2012: figs 19–20), which was illustrated again by Kantor et al. (2018: figs 3F). In both papers, specimen NHMW 1846/0037/0264 from Baden ( Austria) was illustrated as paralectotype ( Stahlschmidt & Fraussen, 2012: figs 21–22; Kantor et al. (2018: figs 3G). The latter specimen was also illustrated by Hörnes (1853: pl. 32, figs 11) but this specimen is not conspecific with Pseudolatirus bilineatus as currently perceived. All authors, including the senior author of this work, who provided the information on the supposed types to Stahlschmidt & Fraussen (2012), had overlooked that the name Fusus bilineatus was made available already by Naumann (1852). Therefore, none of the specimens illustrated by Hörnes (1853), Stahlschmidt & Fraussen (2012) and Kantor et al. (2018) can serve as type material. The illustrations in Naumann (1852) were provided by Paul Maria Partsch (1791–1856) and Moritz Hörnes (1815– 1868) (see Naumann 1854: 1963, footnote) and were based on material from the Natural History Museum Vienna. The manuscript of Partsch with these illustrations is still preserved. Nevertheless, it is not possible to identify the specimens drawn by Partsch in the collection. Therefore, we designate a neotype.
Illustrated material. NHMW 1846/0037/0264g, SL: 33.8 mm, MD: 9.4 mm, Baden ( Austria), Figs 26B View FIGURE 26 1 –B View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 2023/0338/0022, SL: 39.2 mm, MD: 12.6 mm, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania), Figs 2Q View FIGURE 2 , 26C View FIGURE 26 1 –C View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 .
Additional material. NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0264, Möllersdorf ( Austria), SL: 21.2 mm , MD: 7.1 mm, illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 31, fig 12); NHMW 1937 View Materials /0002/0292, Bad Vöslau ( Austria), illustrated in Schaffer (1908: pl. 2, fig. 10); 54 spec. , NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0263, Baden and Möllersdorf ( Austria); 24 spec , NHMW 2023 View Materials /0371/0001 (A1419), Baden-Sooss ( Austria), including specimen illustrated in Schultz (1998: pl. 27, fig. 5); 80 spec. , NHMW 1846 View Materials /0028/0006, Baden ( Austria); 30 spec. , NHMW 1862 View Materials /0001/0210, Baden ( Austria); 20 spec. , NHMW 1866 View Materials /0001/1073, Forchtenau ( Austria); 18 spec. , NHMW 1866 View Materials /0011/0297, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania); 42 spec. , NHMW 1854 View Materials /0035/0220, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania); 18 spec. , NHMW 1867 View Materials /0019/0118, CoŞteiu de Sus ( Romania) .
Revised description. Medium sized, slender fusiform, of up to seven teleoconch whorls; apical angle ~35°. Protoconch multispiral, high conical, weakly cyrtoconoid of 3.5 weakly convex whorls, diameter 1100 μm, height 1200 μm. Last protoconch whorl with comma-shaped axial riblets. Transition to teleoconch marked by onset of two prominent spiral cords overrunning weak axial ribs; spirals slightly swollen over ribs, becoming subobsolete in axial interspaces. Axial ribs subobsolete on later teleoconch whorls. Whorls with very narrow subsutural collar, steep, slightly concave subsutural ramp and marked angulation at shoulder delimited by adapical spiral cord. Spire whorls smooth except for two rows of spirally elongated nodes developed on spiral cords overrunning subobsolete axials and delicate growth lines. Last whorl high, attaining 63–65% of total height, slender, bearing 1–3 spiral rows of weak nodes mid-whorl; base strongly constricted with weak, narrow, widely spaced spiral cords. Aperture elongate, narrowly pyriform. Columellar callus adherent, poorly delimited from base. Columella weakly excavated with up to three weak, narrow, oblique columellar folds on abapical half. Anal canal weakly incised to indistinct, small parietal denticle present in some specimens, anal denticle absent. Outer lip thin, most specimens devoid of lirae, when present lirae variable in number and strength. Siphonal canal extraordinarily long, slightly deflected to the left, moderately narrow, shallowly notched.
Discussion. This is the most abundant fasciolariid in the Paratethyan assemblages and the NHMW houses thousands of specimens from the offshore clays of the Vienna Basin. The species is characterized by a large, multispiral protoconch, which bears prominent axial ribs, and the peculiar sculpture of two rows of spirally elongate nodes. We are not aware of any related species. Pleistocene and extant species, previously placed in Pseudolatirus , have been placed in Crassibougia by Stahlschmidt & Fraussen (2012) and in Takashius Kantor, Fedosov, Snyder & Bouchet, 2022 [= Okutanius Kantor, Fedosov, Snyder & Bouchet, 2018 ], Granulifusus Kuroda & Habe, 1954 ( Kantor et al. 2018) and Vermeijius Kantor, Fedosov, Snyder & Bouchet, 2018 by Kantor et al. (2018).
Occurrences from the Eggenburgian/Ottnangian (Early Miocene) of the North Alpine-Carpathian Foreland Basin (Gernergraben, Kaltenbachgraben in Germany) mentioned by Steininger (1973) will need confirmation and are excluded from the chresonymy.
Paleoenvironment. This species occurs in the clays of the Baden Formation in the Vienna Basin, suggesting middle to outer neritic environments in up to 250 m water depth ( Kranner et al. 2021).
Distribution in Central Paratethys. Badenian (Middle Miocene): Vienna Basin: Baden, Bad Vöslau, Baden-Sooss, Enzesfeld, Möllersdorf, Niederleis ( Austria) (Hoernes &Auinger 1890); Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: Forchtenau, Marz ( Austria) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890); Pannonian Basin: Borsod, Letkés, Szob, Szokolya ( Hungary) ( Báldi 1960; Strausz 1966; Kovács & Vicián 2023); Bükk Mountains: Bükkmogyorósd, Borsodbóta ( Hungary) ( Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972); Făget Basin: Lăpugiu de Sus, CoŞteiu de Sus ( Romania) ( Kovács 2022); Dacian Basin: Staropatica, Urovene ( Bulgaria) (Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960).
Genus Takashius Kantor, Fedosov, Snyder & Bouchet, 2022
Type species. Fusolatirus kuroseanus Okutani, 1975 View in CoL , original designation by Kantor et al. 2018: 36. Present-day, Indo-West Pacific.
Original diagnosis. “ Shell medium-size, reaching 30 mm, fusiform to broad fusiform, strong, with spiral colour bands. Teleoconch whorls evenly strongly convex, shell base sharply narrowing towards long, weakly sinuous siphonal canal. Protoconch multispiral, of 3–3.75 whorls. Axial sculpture of distinct broad, weakly opisthocline, closely spaced ribs. Spiral sculpture of distinct primary cords, subequal in size, and much thinner cordlets between them. Aperture narrow, oval, relatively small, columella with several weak plicae. No distinct parietal knob ” ( Kantor et al. 2018: 36).
Discussion. Takashius Kantor, Fedosov, Snyder & Bouchet, 2022 is a replacement name for Okutanius Kantor, Fedosov, M. A. Snyder & Bouchet, 2018 non D.R. Smith, 1981 [Hymenoptera].
Takashius is highly reminiscent of Granulifusus Kuroda & Habe, 1954 concerning its sculpture [type species Fusus niponicus E.A. Smith, 1879, present-day, western Pacific]. As pointed out by Kantor et al. (2018: 37) the separation between Takashius and Granulifusus is difficult without molecular data, but as rule of thumb Takashius does not attain the large size of Granulifusus . Takashius is also reminiscent in shape and sculpture of Parvofusus Tabanelli, 2014 [type species Fusus lamellosus Borson, 1821 ; original designation by Tabanelli (2014: 32). Pliocene, Mediterranean Sea] but Parvofusus lacks columellar folds (see Ruggieri et al. 1959: pl. 17, fig. 103).
Takashius is known so far only from extant species in the Indo-West Pacific. In addition, we include the Pliocene Mediterranean Takashius ligusticus ( Bellardi, 1884) , the Late Miocene Takashius cognatus ( Bellardi, 1884) , from the Tortonian of Stazzano ( Italy) and the herein newly described Middle Miocene Paratethyan Takashius vinculum nov. sp. and Takashius kantori nov. sp. in this genus, suggesting a Western Tethyan origin of the genus.
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
MD |
Museum Donaueschingen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus ( Naumann, 1852 )
Harzhauser, Mathias, Landau, Bernard M. & Vermeij, Geerat J. 2024 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853)
Kovacs, Z. & Vician, Z. 2023: 236 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853)
Kovacs, Z. 2022: 80 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes, 1853)
Kantor, Y. I. & Fedosov, A. E. & Snyder, M. A. & Bouchet, P. 2018: 16 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (M. Hörnes, 1853)
Lozouet, P. 2015: 31 |
Latirus bilineatus
Popa, M. V. & Duma, A. & Saplacan, A. 2014: 13 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (Hörnes)
Stahlschmidt, P. & Fraussen, K. 2012: 86 |
Pseudolatirus bilineatus (M. Hörnes, 1853)
Snyder, M. 1999: 6 |
Latirus (Pseudolatirus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Schultz, O. 1998: 68 |
Lathyrus (Dolicholathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. 1972: 30 |
Latirus (Dolicholatirus) bilineatus
Strausz, L. 1966: 350 |
Latirus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Baldi, T. 1960: 75 |
Latirus (Dolicholatirus) bilineatus
Glibert, M. 1963: 131 |
Kojumdgieva, E. & Strachimirov, B. 1960: 188 |
Lathyrus
Sieber, R. 1958: 152 |
Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. 1956: 408 |
Lathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Sieber, R. 1937: 132 |
Dolicholathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus
Peyrot, A. 1928: 55 |
Fasciolaria bilineata
Schaffer, F. X. 1908: 109 |
Lathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Boettger, O. 1906: 49 |
Pseudolathyrus bilineatus (Partsch)
Sacco, F. 1904: 26 |
Latirus (Pseudolatirus) bilineatus (Ptsch.)
Boettger, O. 1902: 38 |
Dolicholathyrus (Pseudolathyrus) bilineatus (Partsch)
Cossmann, M. 1901: 24 |
Fasciolaria bilineata
Handmann, R. 1888: 18 |
Fusus bilineatus
Naumann, C. F. 1854: 1066 |
Fusus
Hornes, M. 1848: 19 |
Fusus
Hauer, J. von 1837: 418 |