Psammobates geometricus ( Linnaeus 1758:199 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.7.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3BD32BFF-0402-47FB-A9EE-FE08E260793D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6328722 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8788-FFA0-FFC9-D973-FCFDFEF924EC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Psammobates geometricus ( Linnaeus 1758:199 ) |
status |
|
Psammobates geometricus ( Linnaeus 1758:199)
Syntypes (number uncertain): UPSZTY 20 (formerly ZMUU 20 View Materials ), plus published material. Wallin (1977:77) showed that a Linnaean type specimen (UPSZTY 20) is actually a Geochelone elegans ( Schoepff 1795) ; see also Baard (1991:8) and Wallin (2001:126). To avoid nomenclatural chaos, Hoogmoed & Crumly (1984:241, 254– 55) considered the figure in Piso (1658:105, Fig. 1; reproduced in Hoogmoed & Crumly 1984:p. 255, Fig. 7) as syntypical of P. geometricus , and designated it as lectotype. Bour (2005d:25) and Bour & Pauler (1987:23) photographed a specimen in the NRM, identified it as Mesoclemmys gibba , and considered it a paralectotype of P. geometricus .
Testudo luteola Daudin 1801:277
Holotype: Not located; illustrated in the original description (Pl. XXV, Fig. 3); possibly in the MNHN.
Testudo strauchi Lidth de Jeude 1893:312
Holotype: RMNH 6011 ( Hoogmoed et al. 2010:20); illustrated in the original description (Pl. 9), and photographed in Hoogmoed & Crumly (1984:256).
RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Psammobates geometricus ( Linnaeus 1758:199 )
Iverson, John B. 2022 |
Testudo luteola
Daudin, F. M. 1801: 277 |
Psammobates geometricus ( Linnaeus 1758:199 )
Linnaeus, C. 1758: 199 |