Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856

Alekseev, Vitalii I. & Tomaszewska, Wioletta, 2018, New handsome fungus beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinelloidea: Anamorphidae, Endomychidae) from European amber of the Upper Eocene, Palaeontologia Electronica (6 A) 21 (1), pp. 1-23 : 17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/832

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:152941A8-052F-4134-9E98-ABC4CAC8F01B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11061811

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03986E15-FFCB-4B14-0E4E-4A93FC24FA9C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856
status

 

Phymaphoroides antennatus Motschulsky, 1856

Figure 6.6 View FIGURE 6 -7

Material examined. One complete specimen with the collection number 1219-3 [ CCHH], Baltic amber, Yantarny , Kaliningrad Region, Russia. Body length of the beetle 3.04 mm. The amber piece is embedded in a block of polyester resin (total measurements are 12 x 10 x 6 mm). Syninclusions absent. The amber piece was subjected to thermal and high-pressure processing in an autoclave. Left and ventral parts of specimen are obscured by a dense milky cover in the surrounding amber .

Note. The important characters are unfortunately not visible or insufficiently visible on the specimen. The re-description and exact subfamilial placement of Phymaphoroides are still impossible based on this specimen. The discernible enlarged antennomere 9 with deep concavity on its inner edge looks like that of the subfamily Danascelinae Tomaszewska, 2000 . In the future, detailed comparison of a better visible Phymaphoroides specimen with the newly described Laima gen. nov. is recommended, due to observed similarities between both studied specimens.

However, without a study of the type specimen of Phymaphoroides antennatus , the proper subfamilal placement of this genus cannot be resolved. And unfortunately the location of the type material described by Motschulsky from Baltic amber in the Menge collection [West-Preussisches Provinzial-Museum Danzig], among which is the holotype of Ph. antennatus , is unknown, precluding a reinvestigation of this fossil. The original description lacks many characters important for comparison ( Shockley and Alekseev, 2014) making subsequent conclusions about Phymaphoroides speculative.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

SuperFamily

Coccinelloidea

Family

Endomychidae

SubFamily

Leiestinae

Genus

Phymaphoroides

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF