Phaulula Bolivar, 1906

Gorochov, A. V., 2025, TAXONOMY OF THE KATYDIDS (ORTHOPTERA: TETTIGONIIDAE) FROM EAST ASIA AND ADJACENT ISLANDS. COMMUNICATION 17, Far Eastern Entomologist 514, pp. 1-20 : 7-8

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.514.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9FEABE7D-6BCA-41A0-B204-D3E1A1046BF0

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E6C56E-FFF0-8F5A-FE3D-FA16FC51C716

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Phaulula Bolivar, 1906
status

 

Genus Phaulula Bolivar, 1906 View in CoL

NOTES. This genus was firstly described as Phaula Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1878 for four new species from the Philippines, Java and Singapore ( Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1878). Later: one of these species ( Phaula laevis ) was designated as its type species, the two non-Philippine species were transferred to other genera ( Stictophaula and Arnobia ), the name Phaula in connection with its homonymy was replaced by a new generic name ( Phaulula ), and numerous additional species were attributed to Phaulula from different localities of Indo-Malayan and Papuan Regions (but some of these species were originally described in other genera, and these genera were synonymized with Phaulula ) (see references to these actions in OSF).

In accordance to OSF, this genus has three generic synonyms ( Phaula ; Phauloidea Matsumura et Shiraki, 1908 ; Dichophaula Karny, 1926 ) and includes 28 valid species which are not grouped into subgenera. However, its composition is very problematic, because ten of these species ( Phaula gracilis Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. indica Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. peregrina Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. lenzi Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. inconspicua Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. sumatrana Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. cornuta Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. gigantea Karny, 1923 ; Dichophaula longipes Karny, 1926 ; D. habroides Karny, 1926 ) really or probably belong to other genera, two of the rest species ( Phaula denticauda Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. reticulata Karny, 1926 ) are insufficiently known for any generic determination, and one generic name ( Dichophaula Karny, 1926 with D. longipes as its type species) possibly belongs to a separate genus.

All the other species (16) really or probably belong to Phaulula and may be characterized by the following features: the upper rostral tubercle is rather narrow but dorsoventrally flattened and with its apical part barely erected above the apex of the lower rostral tubercle; the dorsal field of each male tegmen is with the widened proximal portion having a stridulatory apparatus as well as distinctly separated from the very narrow more distal portion by an almost rectangular medial notch (similar to that of Mirolliini ) and usually by a small oblique fold (this fold may be developed in the both tegmina or only in the left tegmen, and the widened proximal portion of the right dorsal field has a small posteromedial lobule; Figs 24, 28 View Figs 21–28 , 55, 57, 59 View Figs 55–60 ); the tegminal lateral fields are with all branches of the tegminal RS usually branching from the tegminal R and RA ( Figs 22, 27 View Figs 21–28 , 50, 52 View Figs 49–54 ), but sometimes this RS with two branches ( Fig. 54 View Figs 49–54 ); the legs are typical of Holochlorini including the presence of a distinct spine on each fore coxa as well as open outer tympana and slit-like inner ones in the fore tibiae; the last abdominal tergite in male has diverse posteromedian process which is not bilobed or only slightly bilobed (but not deeply bifurcated; Figs 29–31, 33–48 View Figs 29–48 , 61–70 View Figs 61–72 ); the cerci and genital plate in male are rather simple in shape, but these cerci usually lack additional branches or processes, and this plate is moderately short and with a rather wide posteromedian notch as well as with indistinct styli ( Figs 29, 31, 35, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48 View Figs 29–48 , 62–64, 66, 67, 69, 70 View Figs 61–72 ).

These species are here grouped into three tentative groups on the base of the male abdominal structure: Ph. laevis group, Ph. ensigera group and a group with rather diverse male abdominal apices. The first group has the male last tergite gradually narrowing into a rather long and moderately thin posterior process which is more or less curved downwards in its distal half ( Figs 29, 30, 33–45 View Figs 29–48 ); this group contains the following species (in the original binomen): Phaula laevis Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1878 (type species); Phauloidea daitoensis Matsumura et Shiraki, 1908 ; Ph. gracilis Matsumura et Shiraki, 1908 , nom. res. [= Phaulula macilenta Ichikawa, 2004 , syn. n.; the latter species name was proposed as a replacement one for Phauloidea gracilis , but the species with the older homonymic species name Phaula gracilis is here removed from Phaulula (see above)]; Phaula malayica Karny, 1926 ; Dichophaula leefmansi Karny, 1926 ; Phaulula apicalis Liu, 2011 ; possibly Phaula dammermani Karny, 1926 and Phaulula trukkensis Willemse, 1951 . The second group has this process very thin (spine-like) and distinctly separated from the last tergite ( Figs 61– 64 View Figs 61–72 ); this group consists of Phaula rugulosa Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1878 , Ph. ensigera Karny, 1926 and possibly Phaulula carolinensis Willemse, 1951 . The third group includes five remaining but evidently unrelated species: Phaula compressa Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. phaneropteroides Brunner-Wattenwyl, 1891 ; Ph. galeata Hebard, 1922 ; Ph. luzonica Hebard, 1922 ; Ph. neglecta Karny, 1931 .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

Family

Tettigoniidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF