Perilampus sirsiris (Argaman)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/jhr.97.133255 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:99F8596D-B97C-4E63-9C20-4BF550CC8E6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14286028 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D23E4A4-834E-5131-88D0-5DBBB2718F65 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Perilampus sirsiris (Argaman) |
status |
|
Perilampus sirsiris (Argaman) View in CoL
Figs 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7 , 24 C View Figure 24
Perilampus cyaneus Dalla Torre, 1898: 355 (new combination?). View in CoL
Perilampus hyalinus Viereck, 1910: 647 (subjective synonym P. cyaneus?, cited by Peck 1963). View in CoL
Taltonos sirsiris Argaman, 1990: 15 View in CoL . Replacement name, Perilampus cyaneus Brullé View in CoL (nec Fabricius 1798).
Perilampus sirsiris Darling, 1996: 113 ( Taltonos, subjective synonym of Perilampus). View in CoL
Perilampus eucyaneus Özdikmen, 2011 View in CoL . Unnecessary replacement name.
Material examined.
Canada: 4 females, 8 males. USA: 17 females, 11 males. (Suppl. materials).
Description.
Female (Fig. 6 View Figure 6 ). Length: 2.5–4.5 mm. Color: head iridescent greenish blue or violet, usually without black coloration between lateral ocellus and frontal carina; mesosoma, and metasoma iridescent greenish blue or violet; clypeus ventral margin black (Fig. 6 I View Figure 6 ); antenna with scape and pedicel weakly iridescent greenish blue or violet, flagellum brown or black, lighter ventrad and distad.
Head (Fig. 6 G – J View Figure 6 ): in dorsal view transverse, width slightly greater than twice length, HW / HL 2.1–2.2. Frontal carina: in anterior view straight to weakly sinuate below midlevel of eye; in dorsal view gradually narrowed V shape around median ocellus, FC / MOD 1.5–1.9; distance from lateral ocellus short, FCLO / LOD 0.6–0.7. Scrobal cavity (Fig. 6 H View Figure 6 ): in anterior view wide, SW / HW about 0.5. Ocelli (Fig. 6 G View Figure 6 ): a line between anterior margin of lateral ocelli reaching anterior margin of median ocellus. POL / OOL 1.7–2.0. Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL 1, 3.1–3.3, 1.6–1.9, 1.0–1.1. Vertex: with strong to weak transverse striations, without large piliferous punctures. Parascrobal area: in lateral view gradually narrowed towards lower eye margin; width narrow, PSW / EL about 0.3; sculpture strongly to weakly striate, or rarely smooth, without large piliferous punctures. Gena (Fig. 6 J View Figure 6 ): entirely or mostly striate along outer eye margin with narrow and short smooth area, striate behind. Malar space: MSL / EH 0.2–0.3. Lower face (Fig. 6 H, I View Figure 6 ): with setae sparse laterad torulus, and usually sparse below. Clypeus (Fig. 6 I View Figure 6 ): CW / CH 1.3–1.4; ventral margin concave; setae evenly distributed, or with small bare area without setae medially.
Mesosoma (Fig. 6 B – F, K, L View Figure 6 ): Lateral panel of pronotum: slightly narrower than prepectus, LPP / PPT 0.7–0.8; without flange or with small rounded flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view (Fig. 6 D, E View Figure 6 ). Mesofemoral depression: usually smooth, weakly imbricate, or rugulose (Fig. 6 L View Figure 6 ). Mesoscutum: punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces (Fig. 6 B View Figure 6 ); lateral lobe weakly punctate with coriarious or smooth interspaces (Fig. 6 C View Figure 6 ), or smooth, along notaulus; parascutal carina usually angulate, rarely steeply curved, often weakly flanged (Fig. 6 F View Figure 6 , arrow). Mesoscutellum: apex with inner margins gradually or abruptly diverging (Fig. 6 K View Figure 6 ); punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces. Axilla: in lateral view imbricate dorsad and carinate or rugose-areolate ventrad. Axillula: smooth dorsad. Fore wing: stigma small, 2.0–2.5 × as wide as postmarginal vein.
Male (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ). Length: usually smaller, 1.7–3.8 mm. As in female, except: Color: mesonotum sometimes with weak cupreous iridescence. Frontal carina (Fig. 7 C View Figure 7 ): distance from lateral ocellus shorter, FCLO / LOD 0.3–0.4. Scape (Fig. 7 F View Figure 7 . G): pits sparse, covering about 0.4 × scape length.
Diagnosis.
Perilampus sirsiris and P. arcus are the only Nearctic species with steeply curved or angulate parascutal carina often with a flange (Fig, 6 F, 7 B, 20 E, 21 B cf. Figs 8 J View Figure 8 , 9 B View Figure 9 ). Perilampus sirsiris differs from P. arcus in usually having an angulate parascutal carina (Fig. 6 F View Figure 6 cf. Fig. 20 F View Figure 20 ), a flat lateral panel of pronotum or with a small rounded flange in posterior oblique view (Fig. 6 D, E View Figure 6 cf. Fig. 20 D View Figure 20 ), and the male scape with sparsely pitted surface distad (Fig. 7 F, G View Figure 7 cf. Fig. 21 G, H View Figure 21 ).
Distribution
(Fig. 25 C View Figure 25 ). Throughout USA and southern Canada: Canada (Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia), USA (Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Oregon, Texas, West Virginia).
Host association.
Perilampus sirsiris is a hyperparasitoid, a parasitoid of dipteran and hymenopteran parasitoids of Lepidoptera , rarely of hymenopteran parasitoids of argid sawflies. Hosts: Tachinidae ( Diptera ) from Hyphantria cunea (Drury) ( Erebidae ) and Malacosoma disstria Hübner ( Lasiocampidae ). Sarcophagidae ( Diptera ) from Neophasia menapia (C. & R. Felder) ( Pieridae ). Braconidae ( Hymenoptera ). Cotesia hyphantriae (Riley) from Hyphantria cunea (Drury) . Ichneumonidae ( Hymenoptera ) from Arge sp. ( Hymenoptera ).
Variation.
There is a rare variant from Manitoulin Island, Ontario, a male ( ROME 152661) which has a wide bare area without setae on the clypeus similar to P. monocteni , but confirmed as P. sirsiris by the steeply curved parascutal carina and COI and ITS 2.
Remarks.
The descriptions of P. sirsiris provided in Brullé (1846) and Argaman (1990) are insufficient for species discrimination, but the holotype of this species is intact ( MNHN). The images of the holotype sent by the MNHN (Fig. 24 C View Figure 24 ) provided sufficient morphological details for associating the holotype with one of the common Nearctic species based on the key and redescription provided herein. Argaman’s descriptions of color and pronotal flange (“ Head and sides of thorax golden-green to bluish ”, “ with a triangularly acute lobe opposite to upper top of prepectus ”) do not match the holotype of P. cyaneus . Due to the dubious nature of the type specimen listed in his annotated checklist, where he states that the holotype is in his private collection (Argaman 1991), Argaman clearly did not examine Brullé’s type. It is likely that the “ Types ” in Argaman’s checklist represent the specimens he regards as conspecifics, rather than the actual extant types ( Darling 1996). We examined two additional NHMH specimens from Jalisco, Mexico misidentified as P. sirsiris by Argaman (1991), identified herein as a female P. hyalinus ( ROME 200751) and male P. ute ( ROME 200740). The only other literature record of P. sirsiris is Graenicher (1909), which mentions the preference of P. hyalinus and P. sirsiris for flowers of Erigeron canadensis Linnaeus. However , given the poor description of P. sirsiris by Brullé and the absence of an indication that Graenicher had examined the type, it is unclear if the observed species was indeed P. sirsiris .
The steeply curved or angulate parascutal carina often with a flange (Figs 6 F View Figure 6 , 7 B View Figure 7 ) is one of the key diagnostic features of P. sirsiris . Perilampus arcus (Figs 20 E View Figure 20 , 21 B View Figure 21 ) also has a similarly modified parascutal carina, but the phylogenetic placement of the two species (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) suggests convergent evolution within the P. hyalinus species complex. This state is also widely distributed in other species of Perilampidae , including some species of the P. platigaster species group, and is almost certainly derived independently. Both genes and species delimitation methods support P. sirsiris (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 , Suppl. material 5) and there are 10 BINed specimens on BOLD ( AEM 7685) from throughout the range of this species (Quebec to Texas) and one specimen ( ROME 185904, Missouri) with a COI sequence reared from Hyphantia cunea .
Perilampus sirsiris parasitizes dipteran and hymenopteran parasitoids of Lepidoptera , which feed on the leaves of deciduous trees. Interestingly, the hosts of P. sirsiris also include sarcophagid parasitoids of the pine butterfly, N. menapia ( Pieridae ) — this is the only species associated with pines other than P. neodiprioni , the hypothesized sister species of P. sirsiris (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) (see Remarks for P. neodiprioni below).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Chalcidoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Perilampus sirsiris (Argaman)
Yoo, Jeong Jae & Darling, D. Christopher 2024 |
Perilampus sirsiris
Darling DC 1996: 113 |
Taltonos sirsiris
Argaman Q 1990: 15 |
Perilampus hyalinus
Viereck HL 1910: 647 |
Peck 1963 |
Perilampus cyaneus
Dalla Torre KW von 1898: 355 |
Ichneumon cyaneus Brullé, 1846: 21 (Plate V, # 4). Type locality: USA , “ Carolina ”. Type material: Holotype. “Carolina”. (Female Paris EY 35408 , MHNH ) (images examined).
Brullé MA 1846: 21 |
Perilampus eucyaneus Özdikmen, 2011
Perilampus eucyaneus Özdikmen, 2011 |