Panus rudis Fr., Epicr. Syst.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.105.121025 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11404236 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/95D719A8-E941-5871-9C45-CB4CA5FE00F4 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Panus rudis Fr., Epicr. Syst. |
status |
|
Panus rudis Fr., Epicr. Syst. View in CoL mycol. (Upsaliae): 398 (1838) [1836–1838]
Fig. 8 D View Figure 8
Ecology.
Solitary on rotten wood.
Distribution.
Brazil, China, France and the Czech Republic ( Czechia).
Specimens examined.
China. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region: Xing’an League, Arshan City, Yiershi Town , 47.29 ° N, 119.84 ° E, 9 September 2002, Tolgor Bau, FJAU 7824 GoogleMaps ; Henan Province: Zhumadian City, Biyang County, Minzhuang Forest Farm , 32.52 ° N, 113.36 ° E, 2 August 2023, Yajie Liu, FJAU 67802 GoogleMaps ; Zhumadian City, Biyang County, Yihezhai Forest Farm , 32.39 ° N, 113.35 ° E, 31 August 2022, Yajie Liu, FJAU 67803 GoogleMaps .
Notes.
This species is extremely similar to P. neostrigosus in appearance and has been treated as the same species (e. g. Pegler 1983; Li and Bau 2014; Li et al. 2015; Vargas-Isla et al. 2015). However, in our conception, these two species should be considered as two independent species. Panus rudis differed from P. neostrigosus in morphology by shorter metuloids and wider cheilocystidia. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis results also support this conclusion.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |