Orphula azteca, Saussure, 1861 a: 315
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10114981 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/33481F5C-FF9F-FFE2-EAC9-FD51A027FA80 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Orphula azteca |
status |
|
azteca Saussure, 1861a: 315 View in CoL [ Oxycoryphus ].
Mexico. Unspecified number of Ƌ and ♀ .
Two Ƌ syntypes. A Ƌ with labels: “Cordova, t.c.” [printed on white card]; “Saussure, Type” [handwritten on white paper]; “ Oxycoryphus (Orphula) aztecus Sauss.” [handwritten on white paper]; “ Orphula azteca Sauss. ” [handwritten by L. Bruner on white card with printed red border]; “ Oxycoryphus aztecus Sauss., Holotypus, CS Carbonell 1966” [handwritten by Carbonell on red card]; “ Syntype not holotype! Hollier 2011” [handwritten on red paper]. Specimen set with right wings spread and left wings folded; both antennae, the last tarsal segment of the left front leg, two tarsal segments of the left middle leg and both hind legs are missing. A Ƌ with labels: “ Cordova , t.c.” [printed on white card]; “O. aztecus Sauss., Mr H. S., Mexique ” [handwritten on blue paper]; “aztecus Sauss, Mexique ” [handwritten on green paper]; “ Syntypus ” [printed on red paper]. Specimen set with wings folded; the right antenna, both front legs and both hind legs are missing. There is a third specimen, collected by Sumichrast, which may also be a syntype. It is not clear why Bruner (1904: 74) assumed that one specimen was the holotype unless he had only seen a single specimen and not consulted the description. Box U 11 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Orphula azteca
Hollier, John 2012 |
azteca
SAUSSURE, H. DE 1861: 315 |