Murina yuanyang, Mou & Qian & Li & Li & Luo & Li, 2024

Mou, Xin, Qian, Yishun, Li, Mei, Li, Biao, Luo, Xiong & Li, Song, 2024, A New Species of Murina (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Yunnan, China, Animals 14 (16), pp. 1-15 : 4-12

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ani14162371

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13829948

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E987B8-9B0C-FFD2-FE16-FACCA0BDFE90

treatment provided by

Jonas

scientific name

Murina yuanyang
status

sp. nov.

Murina yuanyang sp. nov.

Holotype: Field number KIZ20230424 , adult female, collected on 21 May 2023. The mitochondrial COI nucleotide sequence was submitted to GenBank under accession number PQ179689 GoogleMaps .

Type locality: Pinghe   GoogleMaps , Xiaoxinjie Town, Yuanyang County, Yunnan Province, China (22.990097 ◦ N, 102.990097 ◦ E, 2434 m).

Paratype: Field number KIZ20230450 , adult female, collected in Pinghe , Xiaoxinjie Township, Yuanyang County, Yunnan Province, China (22.990097 ◦ N, 102.990097 ◦ E, 2434 m) on 22 May 2023. GoogleMaps Field number KIZ20230415 , adult male, collected in Pinghe , Xiaoxinjie Township, Yuanyang County, Yunnan Province, China (22.991851 ◦ N, 103.002188 ◦ E, 2412 m) on 21 May 2023. The mitochondrial COI nucleotide sequence of KIZ20230415 was submitted to GenBank under accession number PQ179688 GoogleMaps .

Etymology: The name yuanyang refers to the type locality of the species.

Measurements: Measurements of the type specimen are shown in Table 4 View Table 4 .

Diagnosis: Small-sized Murina species, FA 27.66–30.51 mm and GTL 13.44–14.16 mm ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). Elongated tubular nostrils; third, fourth, and fifth finger metacarpals roughly equal in size; tail vertebrae slightly free at tip; plagiopatagium attached at about one-third from base of claw to base of toe, near base of claw ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ). Fur on back glossy, overall dark golden with deep brown, with clearly demarcated color bands; ventral fur gray-white, with golden color on both sides of chest ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ). Sagittal crest absent, lambdoidal crest not prominent ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 ); in lateral view, skull appears slightly elongated with slightly oval braincase, gradually rising with gentle slope from snout to cranial vertex ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (A3,B3)); palatine wide without distinct concavity ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (A2,B2,C2)). I 2 located in front of I 3, clearly visible from side; noticeable gap between I 3 and C 1; height of P 2 less than half that of C 1 and P 4 ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (A3,B3,C3)); crown area of P 2 slightly smaller than that of C 1, less than half crown area of P 4; mesostyle of M 1 and M 2 slightly developed, M 3 reduced ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (A2,B2,C2)). C 1 slightly higher than P 4, P 2 significantly lower than C 1 and P 4. Basal area of C 1 similar to P 4 and more than twice basal area of P 2. Lower molars belong to nyctalodont type ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 (A5,B5,C5)).

Description: Body: Small-sized Murina species, HB 31.37–36.34 mm, WT 3.4–4.7 g, FA 27.66–30.51 mm, GTL 13.44–14.16 mm ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). Nostrils tubular, opening sideways and relatively long ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ). Snout darker than nostrils. Ear length 11.85–14.77 mm, overall shape oval, upper part forms rounded arch, not pointed, deep gray in color, color at base slightly lighter than upper part, approaching gray-white. Ear tragus long and pointed, vertical on inside, curved outwards on outside, narrow at top and wider at bottom, reaching approximately half height of ear. Third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals approximately equal in length, second metacarpal slightly shorter than third, fourth, and fifth. Tail 23.89–31.58 mm ( Table 4 View Table 4 ), shorter than head–body length, slightly free at tip ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ). Plagiopatagium attached at about one-third from base of claw to base of toe, near base of claw ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ).

Fur: Dorsal fur of holotype dark gold mixed with deep brown throughout, with four distinct bands of color on hairs. Base dark brown, middle light brown, upper-middle part with narrow dark brown or blackish brown band, top yellow-brown, sometimes golden yellow. Overall color of back appears slightly mottled and uneven. Short golden hairs on forearms and sparse yellow-brown hairs on interdigital membranes. Ventral side gray-white throughout, with base of hairs dark gray to gray and top gray-white. Neck and anal region whiter, with slight golden color on sides of chest. Relatively sparse gray-white hairs with slight sheen on interdigital membranes. Facial hair short, gray-brown mixed with golden yellow. Other specimens exhibit slight variations in dorsal fur color, appearing golden or yellowish, with distribution and characteristics of ventral and other fur similar to holotype ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ).

Skull: Overall skull relatively small, GTL 13.44–14.16 mm. Sagittal crest absent, lambdoid crest prominent. In dorsal view, braincase almost circular; zygomatic arches weak and slender, gradually widening from front to back, with widest point at root of zygomatic arch; posterior margin of skull slightly prominent; slight downward concavity in middle from snout to frontal region. In lateral view, skull appears slightly elongated with slightly oval braincase; height from snout to parietal shows upward trend, with gradually increasing slope from snout to frontal, and gradually decreasing slope from frontal to parietal, resulting in slight depression between snout and frontal, with slight protrusion at frontal; zygomatic arch rises gradually from anterior to posterior. In ventral view, palatine wide without any obvious concavity, ending at midpoint of C 1; basisphenoid pits tear-drop shaped, extending posteriorly to anterior half of cochlea. Mandible 8.09–8.69 mm. In lateral view, almost straight between coronoid process and condyle, without any depression, slight concavity between condyle and angle; angle short and wide, lower surface of the mandibular dentary forms obvious depression in front of angle; mental foramina clearly visible ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 ).

Dentition: Dental formula: I 1 2 3 − 2 3 C 1 1 PM − 2 − 4 − 2− 4 M = 34. In maxilla, I 2 positioned in front of I 3, I 2 clearly visible in lateral view; crown area of P 2 slightly smaller than that of C 1, less than half crown area of P 4; species belongs to ‘s uilla -type’ based on these characteristics. Upper tooth rows converge slightly anteriorly, with PWC 1 C 1 1.42–1.78 mm and PWM 3 M 3 2.63–2.86 mm. I 2 and I 3 heights approximately equal, with crown area of I 2 approximately half that of I 3. I 2 with two cusps, smaller secondary cusp located behind primary cusp. Posterior external face of I 2 in contact with anterior internal face of I 3, with noticeable gap between I 3 and C 1. C 1 and P 4 heights approximately equal, C 1 slightly elongated and lacking secondary cusps, P 4 wider. C 1 appears slightly circular when viewed from occlusal perspective, with crown area less than half that of P 4. P 2 smaller and compressed, wider than long, distinctly oval-shaped, height close to half that of C 1 and P 4. Mesostyle of M 1 and second upper molars (M 2) not well developed; paracone, metacone, and protocone well developed, with metacone slightly higher than paracone; trigon basin open and talon well developed, with antero-external valley area significantly smaller than that of postero-external valley. M 3 reduced, with only parastyle, paracone, and protocone. Single commissure connecting parastyle and paracone. In mandible, first, second and third lower incisors (I 1, I 2, and I 3) tricuspid and of equal size, but outer cusp of I 3 relatively less distinct; slight overlap of outer cusps of I 1, I 2, and I 3; C 1 contains pointed cusp on anterior inner margin, which touches outer cusp of I 3, making C 1 slightly higher than I 3 in lateral view, with gradual increase in height from I 1 to C 1. C 1 slightly higher than P 4, P 2 significantly lower than C 1 and P 4. Basal area of C 1 similar to P 4 and more than twice basal area of P 2. In lateral view, trigonid of M 1 and lower second molar (M 2) and M 3 clearly tricuspid, with height of metaconid and paraconid approximately two-thirds that of protoconid; talonid of M 1 and M 2 bicuspid, with entoconid and hypoconid clearly separated from trigonid and lower than metaconid and paraconid, with heights approximately equal to metaconid and paraconid. Talonid of M 3 reduced. Lower molars nyctalodont type, with entoconid and hypoconid connected by postcristid ( Figure 3 View Figure 3 ).

Comparisons: Based on its dentition, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. clearly belongs to the ‘ suilla -type’ (maxillary toothrows clearly convergent anteriorly; I 2 anterior to I 3; I 2 clearly visible from lateral view; crown area of P 2 half that of P 4) and can be distinguished from all species in the ‘c yclotis -type’. Based on the reconstructed phylogenetic tree, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. formed a monophyletic group with M. chrysochaetes and was distantly related to other species. Therefore, our comparison focuses primarily on species closely related in the phylogenetic tree and on ‘ suilla -type’ species lacking COI sequences.

Comparison with M. chrysochaetes : At the molecular level, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is most closely related to M. chrysochaetes , but exhibits some differences in morphology and cranial structure. Measurement data for FA and TIB show that Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is slightly larger in body size than M. chrysochaetes , and the HB, TL, E, and HF of the female specimens also showed longer HF and E and significantly different HB and TL ratios (HB/TL ratios were 1.23 and 1.67, respectively) compared with IEBR-M6020 and S186699 (both female). In terms of skull size, both male and female Murina yuanyang sp. nov. are slightly smaller than Murina chrysochaetes (values of STOTL, GTL, CBL, ZYW, BCW). From PWC 1 C 1 /PWM 3 M 3 and C 1 C 1 W/M 3 M 3 W, the values of male Murina yuanyang sp. nov. are 0.59 and 0.67, respectively, and female are 0.60 and 0.69, respectively, while the values of S186699 (female) are 0.66 and 0.74, respectively, which is consistent with the observation from the specimen comparison that the maxillary teeth of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. converge more anteriorly than the holotype of Murina chrysochaetes . The value of CPH shows that Murina chrysochaetes has a higher coronoid process. In terms of external morphology, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. has longer tubular nostrils. On the dorsal side, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is generally dark gold mixed with deep brown, with four color bands on the back, while M. chrysochaetes has a mixture of black and gold stripes and tricolored fur on the back [ 18]. On the ventral side, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. shows a golden hue on the sides of the thorax, while M. chrysochaetes has golden guard hairs from the thorax to lower abdomen, giving it an overall golden appearance. The wing and tail membranes of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. are black, in contrast to those of M. chrysochaetes , which are brown. Regarding the skull structure, the rostrum of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is relatively long, with a gentler forehead slope, resulting in a more elliptical skull shape in lateral view. In contrast, the rostrum of M. chrysochaetes is short and the forehead slope is abrupt, producing a round shape in lateral view. The zygomatic arch of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is thicker and smoother compared to that of M. chrysochaetes , which is thinner and shows a slight concavity. In the mandible, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. has a wider and more robust angle. C 1 of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. slightly higher than P 4 and basal area of C 1 similar to P 4, while C 1 of M. chrysochaetes is the same height as P 4 but exceeds it in basal area. Furthermore, C 1 of M. chrysochaetes is recurved, whereas C 1 of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is straighter, with the talons of M 1 and M 2 more developed ( Figures 3 View Figure 3 and 4A View Figure 4 ).

Comparison with M. harpioloides : Murina yuanyang sp. nov. and M. harpioloides show similarities in morphometric data, including WT, HB, TL, and FA; however, the skull and tooth measurements of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. are slightly smaller than those of M. harpioloides ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). Notably, in the ventral view of the skull, the talons of M 1 and M 2 of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. are more developed, and M 3 is slightly fuller with a different angle compared to M. harpioloides . The curvature at the posterior part of the pterygoid differs significantly between the two species. In the occlusal view of the mandible, P 4 of Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is more elliptical, M 1 and M 2 are slenderer, and the talonid appears sharper; the angle formed by the paracristid and protocristid of M 2 is larger than that of M. harpioloides . From the lingual view, C 1 of M. harpioloides is more pointed and narrows more obviously in the middle ( Figures 3 View Figure 3 and 4B View Figure 4 ).

Comparison with M. eleryi and M. aurata : Eger and Lim [ 18] identified M. chrysochaetes as most similar in size and appearance to M. eleryi and M. aurata , although with a smaller body size. Murina yuanyang sp. nov. is slightly larger than M. chrysochaetes , but still smaller than M. eleryi and M. aurata , with comparatively smaller skull measurements ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). Furey et al. [ 7] distinguished M. eleryi from M. aurata based on larger and longer canines, a feature that also differentiates Murina yuanyang sp. nov. from M. eleryi . In addition, the mesostyles on M 1 and M 2 are much less developed in Murina yuanyang sp. nov. than M. eleryi . Male Murina yuanyang sp. nov. specimens also have longer CM 3 L and CM 3 L compared to the male holotype and paratype of M. aurata , while GTL, CBL, and MDL measurements are significantly shorter, indicating a larger ratio of maxillary and mandibular canine–molar length relative to skull length in Murina yuanyang sp. nov. Furthermore, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. can be distinguished from M. aurata by the relative positions of I 2 and I 3, development of the tooth bases, shape of P 2, and width of the gap between P 2 and P 4. Morphologically, Murina yuanyang sp. nov. has longer tubular nostrils and dark golden fur with brown stripes, differing from the golden fur of M. aurata described by Milne-Edwards [ 32] and the varying yellow-brown to gray-brown to copper-red shades of M. eleryi described by Furey [ 7] ( Figures 3 View Figure 3 and 4C,D View Figure 4 ).

Comparison with other ‘s uilla -type’ species without COI sequences: Other ‘s uilla -type’ species lacking COI sequences include M. beelzebub , M. bicolor , M. fanjingshanensis , M. ryukyuana , and M. tenebrosa . According to Maeda and Matsumura [ 33], Kuo et al. [ 8], Csorba et al. [ 6], and He et al. [ 20], these species are classified as medium- to large-sized within the Murina genus ( Table 5 View Table 5 ), distinguishing them from the smaller-sized Murina yuanyang sp. nov.

Distribution and habitat: The Murina yuanyang sp. nov. specimens were captured at two different locations in Pinghe, Xiaoxin Street, Yuanyang County, Yunnan Province, China (22.99 ◦ N, 103.00 ◦ E and 22.99 ◦ N, 102.99 ◦ E). The habitat consists of a mid-mountain evergreen broad-leaved forest at elevations of 2412 m and 2434 m, respectively. The area features a well-closed canopy, abundant shrubs, and several small streams. Although there are no known caves in the area, the forest contains many large trees with hollows. It is suspected that this insectivorous bat primarily roosts during the day in tree hollows or beneath the dense canopy.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Chiroptera

Family

Vespertilionidae

Genus

Murina

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF