Molestia yaojiapingensis, Irfan & Zhang & Peng, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.8.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7548711 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87CE-BDE2-FF21-FC8C-3DFFFDFBF8C6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Molestia yaojiapingensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Molestia yaojiapingensis sp. nov. (ȐỂĤĢƦ)
Figures 210–212 View FIGURE 210 View FIGURE 211 View FIGURE 212
km 350° N Pihe on Nu Jiang, 26.54978°N, 98.89438°E, alt. 1090m, 29 April 2004, Charles Griswold and D. H. Kavanaugh leg. ( CGY19 ) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. China ( Fig. 212 View FIGURE 212 ), France.
Remarks. The epigyne resembles Molestia molestus ( Tao, Li & Zhu, 1995) in having a similar reduced scape consisting only of the swollen proscapus, which has a very distinct anteromedian cleft ( Fig. 209A–C View FIGURE 209 ). The scape is partly buried inside the epigynal cavity. Based on
Types. Holotype ♀, CHINA, Yunnan, Lushui County, Yaojiaping, at Pianma Road 44.7 km, 25.97479°N, 98.71027°E, alt. 2516m, disturbed forest; dusting webs in understory, 19–20 May 2005, Charles Griswold leg. ( CGY111 ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 9♀, same data as holotype ( CGY111 ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This epithet derives from the type locality.
Diagnosis. The female of the new species can be distinguished from all other congeners by the spermathecae situated dorso-mesally, pointing towards each other and separated by a minimal distance of their diameter ( Fig. 210A–C View FIGURE 210 ); epigynal plate posteriorly with broad lobes on each side ( Fig. 210A–C View FIGURE 210 ).
Description. Female (holotype, 211A, B): Total length: 2.14. Carapace 0.80 long, 0.67 wide, dark brown; fovea, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Clypeus 0.22 high. Sternum longer than wide, brown,, sparsely covered with microsetae. Labium wider than long. Maxillae long, distal end broad with scopulae. Chelicerae with five promarginal and three retromarginal teeth.AER recurved, PER straight, slightly wider. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.04, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.07, AME–AME 0.03, PME–PME 0.04, AME–ALE, 0.05, PME–PLE 0.05, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–ALE 0.33, PLE–PLE 0.36, ALE–PLE contiguous. Length of legs: I 3.96 (1.05, 1.28, 0.97, 0.66), II 3.23 (0.94, 0.99, 0.79, 0.51), III 2.51 (0.72, 0.78, 0.62, 0.39), IV 3.25 (0.88, 1.06, 0.77, 0.54). Leg formula I-IV-II-III. Tm I 0.36, Tm IV absent. Tibial spine formula: 2-2-2-2. Abdomen 1.34 long, 0.91 wide, oval, gray, dorsally with distinct pattern; ventral side brown.
Epigyne ( Fig. 210A–C View FIGURE 210 ): Scape longer than wide, round, with lateral pockets on inner surface. Stretcher absent. Posterior median plate broad, rectangular. Spermathecae situated dorso-mesally, pointing towards each other, separated by minimal distance of their diameter.
Male. Unknown.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 212 View FIGURE 212 ).
Genus Mughiphantes Saaristo & Tanasevitch, 1999 (ƱƉƦø)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |