Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5537.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7799C688-8554-4770-AAE6-80F322CE304C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14248135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B42964-0770-7008-DB97-CCABFE9F6DEC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939 |
status |
|
Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939 View in CoL
( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1–5 )
Type material. Holotype deposited in FMNH ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1–5 ). Labels: 1) “Microbr./gilvicornis/Brg” [white label with submarginal green square, handwritten]; 2) “La Caja, San. José/(Schmidt?)/ Costa Rica ” [white label, handwritten]; 3) “Field Mus. Nat. Hist./1966/ A. Bierig Colln. /Acc. Z-13812" [white label, printed]; 4) “ HOLOTYPE /teste A.Westrich 2015/GDI Imaging Project” [purple label, printed]; 5) [unreadable, black label, handwritten?]; 6) “GENOTYPUS” [old yellow label, handwritten]; 7) “( QR Code)/FMNHINS/3048034/ FIELD MUSEUM /Pinned” [white label, printed]; 8) “PHOTOGRAPHED/ A. Westrich 2015/EMu Catalog” [blue label, printed].
Diagnosis. Microbrachida gilvicornis differs from M. perniciosae in having body rusty brown, with abdominal segments V to VI slightly darker; antennomeres with the same color; body with pubescence, more conspicuous on pronotum and elytra ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–5 ); tergum VIII with posterior margin emarginate ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–5 ).
Distribution. Costa Rica (San José: La Caja).
Remarks. Bierig (1939) questioned the sex of the specimen and suggested that the holotype is a female. Currently, it is not possible to determine its sex. According to Bierig (1939), Heinrich J. C. Schmidt collected the holotype in 1936.
FMNH |
Field Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.