Megalipeurus sinensis, Gustafsson & Lei & Chu & Zou, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0AD801-C329-4D41-B081-1647491DF842 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3684855 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BA7024-9B06-EC45-55EF-FB84FCF7FE5E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megalipeurus sinensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megalipeurus sinensis new species
( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–18 , 30 View FIGURES 29–32 , 60–62 View FIGURES 57–68 , 85 View FIGURES 85–87 , 90 View FIGURE 90 , 94 View FIGURES 92–95 )
Type host. Arborophila gingica (Gmelin, 1789) —white-necklaced partridge.
Type locality. South eastern China .
Diagnosis. Only two other species of Megalipeurus have pointed frons: M. unicolor and M. songprakobi . Megalipeurus sinensis is most similar to M. unicolor , based on the shape of the frons (lateral sections of frons concave in both these species, but more or less straight in M. songprakobi ), the long, slender parameres (short in M. songprakobi ), and male tergopleurite VIII being medianly continuous in both species (medianly separate in M. songprakobi ). Megalipeurus sinensis can be separated from M. unicolor by the following characters: frons more narrowly pointed in M. unicolor than in M. sinensis ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–18 ); proximal margin of mesosome straight with angular lateral ends in M. unicolor , but with median depression separating two rounded lobes in M. sinensis ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57–68 ); distal lobes of mesosome smaller in M. unicolor than in M. sinensis ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57–68 ); gonopore with rhombic medio-anterior structure in M. unicolor , but with flaring triangular structure in M. sinensis .
Description.
Male. Head slender, frons convergent to blunt median point ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–18 ), lateral margins of preantennal head convergent anteriorly. Marginal carina narrow, interrupted laterally. Dorsal preantennal suture medianly continuous, reaching far lateral to ads. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–18 . Antennae as in Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–32 ; without tooth-like projection on scape; no rugose area on flagellomere I. Thoracic and abdominal plates and chaetotaxy as in Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–18 . Reticulation weak, limited to lateral ends of tergopleurites. Subgenital plate as in Fig. 85 View FIGURES 85–87 , stylus short and blunt. Basal apodeme slender ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 57–68 ). Anterior margin of mesosome with deep, narrow median depression, separating large, rounded lobes ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57–68 ). Distal mesosomal lobes large, overall shape somewhat square-shaped. Gonopore reaches distal margin of mesosome, with flaring triangular structure just proximal to opening. Parameres about twice as long as mesosome, slender ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 57–68 ); parameral heads bifid; pst1 at about half-length of paramere, pst2 apical. Measurements as in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
Female. Unknown.
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the type locality, China.
Type material. Holotype ♂, S.E. China, Nov. 1897, R. Meinertzhagen , 3598, NHMUK010682553 About NHMUK ( NHML) [specimen closest to label with louse information, marked with red dot on slide] . Paratype ♂, in same slide and with same data as holotype ( NHML) .
Remarks. The head sensillus s2 is not visible in either of the two males of M. sinensis examined, but is present in extralimital specimens of other species, including Megalipeurus tropicoperdix and M. unicolor . Specimens of M. sinensis collected in the future are likely to have head sensillus s2.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |