Lychnophora rosmarinifolia Martius (1822: 155)

Loeuille, Benoît, Semir, João & Pirani, José R., 2019, A synopsis of Lychnophorinae (Asteraceae: Vernonieae), Phytotaxa 398 (1), pp. 448-450 : 448-450

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.398.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DB87EF-FFBE-CC00-FF35-FB00376E6B4B

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lychnophora rosmarinifolia Martius (1822: 155)
status

 

17. Lychnophora rosmarinifolia Martius (1822: 155) View in CoL . Type:— BRAZIL. Minas Gerais: in summis jugis montium ad

Tejuco et Milho Verde districtus adamantini, July 1818, C. F. P . von Martius s.n. (503) (holotype: M e! [ M0029478 ];

isotype: P [ P04416537 (fragment)]) ( Fig. 25 F View FIGURE 25 ) .

Lychnophora bahiensis Mattfeld (1923: 430) View in CoL . Type:— BRAZIL. Bahia View in CoL : caatingazone, 1914, P. von Lützelburg 12460 (holotype: M e! [ M0029464 ]; isotype: B †) .

Distribution and habitat: — Brazil ( Bahia , Minas Gerais, widespread in the Espinhaço Range of mountains). Campo rupestre; 800–1550 m.

Taxonomic notes: —A species best recognized by its lanceolate leaves with acute apices and cordate to auriculate bases, and capitula with 1 to5 florets.It can be confused with Lychnophora gardneri , which differs from L. rosmarinifolia in its leaves with obtuse to slightly rounded apices, attenuate bases and secondary veins obscured by a villous indument on abaxial face. Also similar to L. staavioides and L. pohlii : see these species for a discussion of the differences. Some controversies exist concerning the identity of L. bahiensis , L. rosmarinifolia and L. uniflora . Coile & Jones (1981) suggested a hybrid origin for the two former species ( L. staavioides × L. uniflora ) but that hypothesis was discarded by subsequent authors ( Robinson 1983, Semir 1991, Hind 1995). However, Robinson (1983) and Hind (1995) applied the name L. bahiensis for plants identified here as L. uniflora (following Semir (1991)). The conspecificity of L. bahiensis with L. rosmarinifolia is quite clear upon the distinctive leaf morphology shared by all studied specimens. See comment under L. salicifolia for the publication of the name L. bahiensis in Lützelburg (1922).

Representative specimens: — BRAZIL. Bahia : Piatã, estrada Piatã – Ribeirão, 13°07’15”S, 41°49’34”W, 1380 m, 1 November 1996, H. P GoogleMaps . Bautista et al. PCD 3865 ( ALCB, SPF). Minas Gerais: Diamantina , planalto, 14 July 1970, A. P . Duarte 12816 ( RB, UEC); Santana do Riacho, Serra do Cipó, 10–20 km NE de Cardeal Mota, camino a Conceição do Mato Dentro , 19°20’S, 43°35’W, 1050 m, 16 May 1990, M. M GoogleMaps . Arbo et al. 4219 ( CTES, SPF, UEC) .

C

University of Copenhagen

F

Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department

P

Museum National d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) - Vascular Plants

M

Botanische Staatssammlung München

B

Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet

H

University of Helsinki

ALCB

Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Universitário de Ondina

SPF

Universidade de São Paulo

A

Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum

RB

Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro

UEC

Universidade Estadual de Campinas

NE

University of New England

CTES

Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Asterales

Family

Asteraceae

Genus

Lychnophora

Loc

Lychnophora rosmarinifolia Martius (1822: 155)

Loeuille, Benoît, Semir, João & Pirani, José R. 2019
2019
Loc

Lychnophora bahiensis

Mattfeld, J. 1923: )
1923
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF