Loxosceles bodoquena Bertani & Gallão, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.921.2419 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7FBED205-E8D0-4E12-B697-0837E53B2BBF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10635173 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/12887D5F-9548-4062-B85C-9545BB5108FC |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:12887D5F-9548-4062-B85C-9545BB5108FC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Loxosceles bodoquena Bertani & Gallão |
status |
sp. nov. |
Loxosceles bodoquena Bertani & Gallão sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:12887D5F-9548-4062-B85C-9545BB5108FC
Figs 32−45 View Figs 32−36 View Figs 37−43 View Figs 44−47
Diagnosis
Males resemble those of L. gaucho , L. similis , L. adelaida , L. variegata , L. troglobia and L. planetaria sp. nov. by the cymbium more than half length of tibia of palpus ( Figs 41−43 View Figs 37−43 ). They differ from L. troglobia by the shorter embolus, normal eyes and body pigmentation; from L. gaucho by the longer and less incrassate palp tibia, from L. similis by the slender and straighter embolus, from L. variegata by the shorter embolus, from L. adelaida by the shorter and slender embolus, and from L. planetaria by the longer embolus ( Figs 39−40 View Figs 37−43 ). Females resemble those of L. gaucho , L. similis , L. variegata and L. planetaria by the well-developed and sclerotized transverse plate of the spermathecae ( Figs 34−36 View Figs 32−36 ). They differ from L. similis and L. planetaria by the shorter receptacles, from L. gaucho by the shorter and straighter receptacles, and from L. variegata by the longer receptacles ( Figs 34−36 View Figs 32−36 ). Additionally, males and females differ from those of the species above, except L. troglobia , by the weakly pigmented tegument ( Figs 32 View Figs 32−36 , 37 View Figs 37−43 , 44−45 View Figs 44−47 ).
Etymology
The specific name is a name in apposition and refers to the type locality of the species, the Bodoquena mountain range (a huge karst area), in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Type material
Holotype
BRAZIL • ♀; Mato Grosso do Sul, Bodoquena, Dente de Cão Cave ; 20°44′48″ S, 56°47′04″ W; 13 Jun. 2022; M.E. Bichuette, D.F. Torres, L.M. Cordeiro, D.M. Borges, S.G. Jimenez, A. Chagas-Jr and J.E. Gallão leg.; LES 0028828 About LES GoogleMaps
Paratypes
BRAZIL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, 1 immature; same collection data as for holotype; LES 0028829 About LES to LES 0028831 About LES GoogleMaps .
Description
Female holotype (LES 0028828)
Total length 7.78. Carapace 3.15 long, 2.69 wide ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32−36 ). Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.15, PME 0.14, PLE 0.16, PME–PLE 0.04, PME–ALE 0.24; clypeus 0.34. Leg formula II, IV, I, III. Leg lengths: leg I: femur 7.54, patella 1.07, tibia 7.83, metatarsus 7.77, tarsus 1.67, total 25.88; II: 8.49, 1.07, 8.86, 9.36, 1.76, 29.54; III: 6.57, 1.05, 6.03, 7.31, 1.35, 22.31; IV: 7.41, 1.09, 7.16, 8.82, 1.64, 26.12. Palp: femur 1.30 long, 0.21 wide; patella 0.34 long, 0.29 wide; tibia 0.77 long, 0.22 wide; tarsus 1.02 long, 0.18 wide. Labium 0.73 long, 0.49 wide. Sternum 1.72 long, 1.55 wide. Femur I 2.39 times as long, tibia I 2.48 times as long, and leg I 8.21 times as long as carapace. Palp femur 6.19 times as long as wide; tibia 3.5 times as long as wide; tarsus not incrassate ( Fig. 33 View Figs 32−36 ). Spermathecae transverse sclerotized plate short with almost-straight receptacles positioned at an angle of 45° to the inner side ( Figs 34−35 View Figs 32−36 ). Dorsal part of the bursa copulatrix medially sclerotized ( Fig. 35 View Figs 32−36 ). Cephalic region of carapace with some sparse, long greyish setae ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32−36 ). Carapace light brown with slightly darker pars cephalica and border ( Fig. 32 View Figs 32−36 ). Legs light brown, covered with short, greyish setae. Palp light brown, except for reddish-brown tibia and tarsus ( Fig. 33 View Figs 32−36 ). Coxae and sternum light brown. Endites and labium reddish brown.
Male paratype (LES 0028829)
Total length 5.80. Carapace 2.52 long, 2.23 wide ( Fig. 37 View Figs 37−43 ). Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.12, PME 0.10, PLE 0.12, PME–PLE 0.04, PME–ALE 0.18; clypeus 0.32. Leg formula II, IV, I, III. Leg lengths: leg I: femur 7.25, patella 1.00, tibia 7.96, metatarsus 8.85, tarsus 1.77, total 26.83; II: 9.24, 1.04, 10.57, 12.67, 1.94, total 35.46; III: 6.65, 0.95, 6.40, 8.21, 1.42, 23.63; IV: 7.33, 0.96, 7.58, 9.88, 1.72, 27.47. Palp: femur 1.39 long, 0.29 wide; patella 0.37 long, 0.31 wide; tibia 0.69 long, 0.44 wide; cymbium 0.76 long, 0.42 wide. Labium 0.51 long, 0.38 wide. Sternum 1.48 long, 1.30 wide. Femur I 2.87 times as long, tibia I 3.16 times as long, and leg I 10.65 times as long as carapace. Palpal femur 4.79 times as long as wide, tibia 1.57 times as long as wide, cymbium oval ( Figs 41−43 View Figs 37−43 ). Bulb suboval, roughtly half cymbium length. Embolus curved from its base, approximately 2.33 times as long as bulb length in retrolateral view, without carina ( Figs 38–40 View Figs 37−43 ). Cephalic region of carapace covered with some greyish sparse setae ( Fig. 37 View Figs 37−43 ). Carapace light brown. Cephalic region the same color of thorax. ( Fig. 37 View Figs 37−43 ). Legs, palps, endites, coxae, sternum, and labium light brown. Labium and endites a little darker. Abdomen greyish.
Natural history
Specimens of Loxosceles bodoquena sp. nov. were only found in the aphotic zones in the deep zones of the Dente de Cão Cave. Specimens were found under rock boulders in a moist clay substrate ( Figs 44– 45 View Figs 44−47 ). The caves and the region were sampled for a long time and no specimen of L. bodoquena was ever found in the epigean ( Cordeiro et al. 2014). Relative humidity in the cave was>90%.
Distribution
BRAZIL: State of Mato Grosso do Sul ( Fig. 1 View Fig ).
Remarks
The very similar genitalia morphology indicates Loxosceles bodoquena sp. nov. is closely related with L. planetaria sp. nov. and both are found in the same cave system. Interestingly, L. bodoquena shows some troglomorphisms as depigmentation and slightly longer legs ( Figs 32 View Figs 32−36 , 37 View Figs 37−43 , 44−45 View Figs 44−47 ), and we propose it as a troglobitic species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |