Liptena subundularis (Staudinger, 1892)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4314/met.v32i1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABBBFC07-2EB8-4D69-AEE8-B933CE174EEF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14198483 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B287CA-FF8F-253E-FC8E-0FD6FD778975 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Liptena subundularis (Staudinger, 1892) |
status |
|
Liptena subundularis (Staudinger, 1892) View in CoL
Stempffer (1957) attributed the three females from Bipindi to L. augusta when he reinstated this species, but they are clearly females of L. subundularis .
The description of this species is based on "several" males from Gabon (Ogowe, leg. Mocquerys) and one female from Cameroon [Victoria (now Limbe), leg. Teusz]. Here again, Stempffer et al. (1974: 156) considered that "Staudinger’s types of [ L subundularis ] were mostly destroyed in the last war". But they found in the collection of the London Museum a male collected in Ogowe by Mocquerys “which is believed to be one of the original series” and which bears an “Origin” label [like those that Staudinger associated with his typical material], and they designated it as a lectotype.
Five of Staudinger's syntypes have also been rediscovered in the Berlin Museum [four males from Ogowe and the female from Victoria).
One of the males (the one with the best drawn underside) bears a label indicating that it is illustrated by Grose-Smith (1892 pl. XVIII, Figs 9 & 10). Grose-Smith’s publication offers "photographic representations of the type specimens in the (Berlin Museum)”, and one could conclude that the male illustrated by Grose-Smith is the type. But the lectotype designated by Stempffer et al. (1974) is also a syntype, from the same locality, and it was furthermore, dissected by one of the authors (Bennett), and it does not seem justified to reverse this designation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |