Lindingaspis misrae (Laing) Ben-Dov, 2006
publication ID |
11755334 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C9CF1ED8-12EB-4FF7-9617-3F626258D97F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5064398 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6239DD14-924F-6975-C02A-FD7354211336 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lindingaspis misrae (Laing) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Lindingaspis misrae (Laing) comb. nov.
Aonidiella misrae Laing, 1929: 491 View in CoL ; Borchsenius, 1966: 297; BenDov & German, 2003: 127. Lindingaspis fusca McKenzie, 1943: 151 View in CoL ; McKenzie, 1950: 101, 113. syn. nov.
Laing (1929) described A. misrae View in CoL from leaves of Tamarindus indica (Leguminosae) View in CoL , collected at Pusa , Bihar, India, and indicated that the typesseries was deposited in the Natural History Museum, London ( BMNH). Dr. Jon Martin ( BMNH) kindly searched the BMNH collection and found no syntype slides of this species. Therefore, he sent me dry material from the original collection, which included two adult females and one adult male. Each of these specimens was mounted on a separate slide. One of the females is here designated lectotype and the slide is clearly marked .
Studies of the abovementioned specimens showed that the adult female of A. misrae is characterized mainly in: body pyriform; prosoma not produced posteriorly into distinctive lobes; dorsal ducts of the pygidium of two sizes; marginal paraphyses of pygidium well developed, extending as anterior as abdominal segment IV. These characters clearly show that A. misrae does not belong to the genus Aonidiella and warrant its placement in the genus Lindingaspis MacGillivray.
Laing (1929) clearly indicated in both the text and illustration that the adult female of A. misrae did not possess perivulvar pores. However, the typeseries specimens do possess perivulvar pores in four groups: 8 or 9 discpores in each anterior group and 1–6 pores in each posterior group. Further comparisons of L. misrae with other species of Lindingaspis showed that Lindingaspis fusca McKenzie, 1943 , is morphologically identical with Lindingaspis misrae ( Laing, 1929) .
The description and illustration of the adult female under the name L. fusca by McKenzie (1943, 1950) adequately represents the taxonomic features of L. misrae .
Material examined. LECTOTYPE female of Aonidiella misrae Laing (here designated): INDIA, Bihar, Pusa, on Tamarindus indica ; additional female and one adult male (BMNH). Two female paratypes of Lindingaspis fusca McKenzie, 1943 , INDIA, Maharashtra, Poona [=Pune], on sago palm, Cycas circinalis , collected 1 June, 1932, Harold Compere (Bohart Museum of Entomology, Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, USA).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lindingaspis misrae (Laing)
Ben-Dov, Yair 2006 |
Aonidiella misrae
Ben-Dov, Y. & German, V. 2003: 127 |
Borchsenius, N. S. 1966: 297 |
McKenzie, H. L. 1950: 101 |
McKenzie, H. L. 1943: 151 |
Laing, F. 1929: 491 |