Ligophorus funnelus, Lim, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13256712 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F887D1-FFA6-7A15-EB14-FD76FE7AFB1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ligophorus funnelus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ligophorus funnelus View in CoL , new species
( Fig. 9A–G View Fig )
Type-host. — Liza subviridis Valenciennes
Type-locality. — Off Carey Island , Banting, Malaysia (2°51'N, 101°22'E) GoogleMaps
Type specimens. — Holotype: NHMUK 2012.7 About NHMUK .2.14
Paratypes: 4 paratypes NHMUK 2012.7.2.15– 18 in the Natural History Museum , London ; 3 paratypes ZRC.PAR.01, ZRC. PAR.03 and ZRC.PAR.09 in the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research , National University of Singapore ; 26 paratypes MZUM (P)2012.828(P)–853(P) in the University of Malaya collection .
Material studied. — 34 specimens studied; 28 specimens measured.
Etymology. — This species is named after its funnel-like accessory piece. Note that ‘funnelus’ is a noun in apposition.
Description. — Body elongate, 585 (381–790) × 95 (52–134) (n = 28), pharynx size 34 (29–39) × 34 (30–41) (n = 28). Head-organs, eye-spots, and alimentary system as in L. navjotsodhii , new species. Haptor well demarcated; size 86 (59–117) × 106 (46–162) (n = 28); 14 larval type marginal hooks, length 13 (9–15) (n = 28); two pairs of anchors; 2 dorsal anchors, inner length 25 (22–28) (n = 28), outer length 24 (23–25) (n = 28), inner root 12 (10–13) (n = 28), outer root 7 (5–8) (n = 28); point 6 (4–7) (n = 28); 2 ventral anchors, inner length 29 (24–32) (n = 28), outer length 34 (31–36) (n = 28), inner root 11 (9–13) (n = 28), outer root 9 (5–11) (n = 28), point 5 (4–7) (n = 28); 2 connecting bars: U-shaped dorsal bar, 38 (35–41) × 4 (3–6) (n = 28); ventral bar inverted V, 34 (30–36) × 7 (6–8) (n = 28), AMP with two membranous lateral pieces and flattened median piece, distance between lateral pieces, 6 (5–7) (n = 28). Soft anatomical male reproductive system as in L. navjotsodhii , new species. Copulatory organ consists of copulatory tube, length 77 (64–85) (n = 28) with bilobed initial part and funnel-like accessory piece, 24 (19–28) (n = 28). Soft anatomical female reproductive system as in L. navjotsodhii , new species except vagina sclerotised, sclerotised vaginal opening, sub-marginal, vaginal tube sclerotised, 37 (33–41) (n = 10), leading to ovoid seminal receptacle, sperm-filled duct from seminal receptacle to oviduct.
Differential diagnosis. — L. funnelus , new species is grouped with L. navjotsodhii , new species and L. chelatus , new species ( Fig. 2 View Fig ) in the PCA scatterplot in having anchors, bars and copulatory tube of similar sizes. L. funnelus , new species differs in having a single funnel-shaped accessory piece compared to two opposing accessory pieces in L. navjotsodhii , new species and L. chelatus , new species ( Figs. 9F View Fig , 7F View Fig , 8F View Fig ). The NT analyses show that L. funnelus , new species is similar to L. bantingensis , new species in the structure of the anchors and accessory piece, to L. vanbenedenii in the anchors and AMP and to L. uruguayense , L. pilengas , and L. saladensis in the structure of the bars and AMP ( Table 2). However L. funnelus , new species differs from these abovementioned species in having a single funnel-shaped accessory piece ( Fig. 9F View Fig ). L. funnelus , new species is similar to L. bantingensis , new species in the structure of the anchors and in having a funnel-like accessory piece ( Figs. 9F View Fig , 11F View Fig ) but the two species differ in the detailed structure of the accessory piece, where in L. funnelus , new species, the proximal opening is larger compared to the smaller opening in L. bantingensis , new species; in the detailed structures of the AMP where L. funnelus , new species has a depressed-flat median piece while L. bantingensis , new species has a slight raised median piece ( Figs. 9D View Fig , 11D View Fig ) and L. bantingensis , new species is smaller in terms of size of anchors, bars and copulatory tube as shown in the scatterplot ( Fig. 2 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |