Kasagia elegans ( Stebbing, 1921 ) Forges & Lee & Ng, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5048.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:951BE302-C0BF-4AA3-AE12-BBAC4EDEBAFB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5556359 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B187B7-FF89-FFA8-89B3-A5C0FDE65CCC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Kasagia elegans ( Stebbing, 1921 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Kasagia elegans ( Stebbing, 1921) View in CoL comb. nov.
( Figures 1B–D View FIGURE 1 , 14 View FIGURE 14 , 15A–C View FIGURE 15 , 16A–C View FIGURE 16 , 17A, B View FIGURE 17 , 18 View FIGURE 18 , 20A–C View FIGURE 20 )
Eurynome elegans Stebbing, 1921: 454 View in CoL , pl. 108.— Barnard, 1950: 57, fig. 12d, e.
Choniognathus elegans View in CoL — Griffin & Tranter, 1986: 203.— Ng et al., 2008: 116.
Material examined. Neotype (herein designated): 1 male (cl 11.8 mm, pcl 9.8 mm, cw 7.9 mm, bcw 7.4 mm) (MNHN-IU-2008-10340), stn CC 3159 , Mozambique Channel , 2355’S 3537’E, 148–152 m, coll. MAINBAZA, 15 April 2009. Others: 1 female (cl 7.9 mm, pcl 6.3 mm, cw 4.9 mm, bcw 4.5 mm) (MNHN-IU-2008-10339), stn CC3159 , Mozambique Channel, 2355’S 3537’E, 148–152 m, coll. MAINBAZA, 15 April 2009.— 1 female (cl 11.9 mm, pcl 9.3 mm, cw 7.4 mm, bcw 6.9 mm) (MNHN-IU-2010-77), stn DW3196, Madagascar,1208’S 4856’E, 238–249 m, coll. MIRIKY, 28 June 2009.
Diagnosis. Postfrontal region of carapace relatively short ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ); granules on posterior dorsal half of carapace closely packed ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ). Base of pseudorostral spines separated from supraorbital eave by distinct gap ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ). Supraocular eave distinctly more swollen, strongly carinate, separated from pseudorostral spine by a distinct cleft ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ). Hepatic spine auriculiform, clearly lobiform, same size as postocular spine, directed outwards ( Fig. 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ); branchial margin of carapace with 4 strong boletiform tubercles in ( Figs. 16B, C View FIGURE 16 ; 18A View FIGURE 18 ). Basal antennal article enlarged proximally, forming broad triangular tooth basally, with deep median longitudinal groove, margins prominently raised ( Figs. 17B View FIGURE 17 , 18G View FIGURE 18 ). Epistome forming 3 lobes. Buccal cavity wider anteriorly; ischium of third maxilliped with longitudinal row of 3 strong granules ( Figs. 17B View FIGURE 17 , 18F View FIGURE 18 ). Anterior part of the male thoracic sternum wide, smooth ( Fig. 18G View FIGURE 18 ). Male pleon narrow, with long triangular telson ( Fig. 18G View FIGURE 18 ). Chelipeds long, spiny; merus longer than carapace with 4 or 5 spines on each margin; carpus long with distal spine, distal part wider; chela long with 5 spines on outer border ( Fig. 15A View FIGURE 15 , 18C, D View FIGURE 18 ); fingers long slender.Ambulatory legs short, with dorsal margin of merus carinate. G1 relatively more sinuous ( Fig. 20A, B View FIGURE 20 ).
Type locality. Cape Vidal , Zululand, South Africa .
Remarks. Stebbing (1921: 454) described Eurynome elegans from a small female 8.0 × 7.0 mm (including spines) from Cape Vidal in South Africa and provided a rather schematic figure of the species ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ). Barnard (1950: 57) did not examine Stebbing’s specimen but recorded another female (10.0 × 6.0 mm) from the same location, with his description matching that by Stebbing, and he also figured the gastric and cardiac regions of the carapace and the last ambulatory merus. The provenance of the type specimen of Eurynome elegans is not known. Ng et al. (2008: 219) discussed the problem with the type material of another species from the same paper, Pachygrapsus polyodous Stebbing, 1921 (now in Euchirograpsus H. Milne Edwards, 1853 , Plagusiidae ), noting that the type could not be located in South African Museum or the Natural History Museum in London where some of Stebbing’s material was donated. Some of his material has been found in London (e.g., see Ng & Clark 2010). At the author’s request, Paul Clark searched the NHM reference collection, but the specimen could not be located. Futhermore, the name was not in the register of material given to the museum. In all likelihood, the holotype of Eurynome elegans is no longer extant.
Griffin & Tranter (1986: 203) transferred it to Choniognathus commenting that this was done on the basis of the type of carapace tubercles, the form of the basal antennal article and the first pleopod of the male. The G1 of the species, however, has never been recorded, although it is possible the authors examined specimens that were not recorded in their paper.
The present three specimens are referred to Stebbing’s (1921) species. The smallest specimen (cl 7.9 mm, cw 4.9 mm, MNHN-IU-2008-10339) is similar in size to the holotype and shares all the key features of the species. The prominent auriculate and lobiform postorbital and hepatic spines are diagnostic, as are the carinate supraorbital eaves ( Figs. 15A–C View FIGURE 15 , 16A–C View FIGURE 16 ), agreeing with the original figures ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ). The lateral spines of this female are acute and spinyform like in the holotype ( Fig. 16A View FIGURE 16 ), but in the two larger specimens (including a male), these spines become distinctly fungiform in shape ( Fig. 16B, C View FIGURE 16 ). As such, the species is assigned to Kasagia .
Another similar species, K. sudhakari Padate, Manjebrayakath & Ng, 2019 , also occurs in the western Indian Ocean and is sympatric with K. elegans comb. nov., it is useful to select a neotype for the latter species. This is especially considering that it is the oldest of the three Kasagia species known, the rather poor figures provided by Stebbing (1921), and its close resemblance to K. arbastoi . A neotype will help stabilise the taxonomy of the whole genus. A male specimen (cl 11.8 mm, pcl 9.8 mm, cw 7.9 mm, bcw 7.4 mm, MNHN-IU-2008-10340) from the Mozambique Channel is here designated as the neotype of Eurynome elegans Stebbing, 1921 ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 15A View FIGURE 15 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 18 View FIGURE 18 , 20A–C, I View FIGURE 20 ). This location is about 600 km to the northeast of the original type locality at Cape Vidal in South Africa but is in the same system.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kasagia elegans ( Stebbing, 1921 )
Forges, Bertrand Richer De, Lee, Bee Yan & Ng, Peter K. L. 2021 |
Choniognathus elegans
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. F. 2008: 116 |
Griffin, D. J. G. & Tranter, H. A. 1986: 203 |
Eurynome elegans
Barnard, K. H. 1950: 57 |
Stebbing, T. R. R. 1921: 454 |