Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995

Pereira, Luis Alberto, 2012, A New Dwarf Species, New Distribution Records, And Supplementary Descriptive Notes Of The Centipede Genus Ityphilus Cook, 1899 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha: Ballophilidae) From Central Amazonia, Brazil, Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 52 (25), pp. 291-309 : 300

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S0031-10492012002500001

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E94926-FFD5-FFAB-091C-FF0F3CEDF988

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995
status

 

Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995 View in CoL

( Figs. 18-25 View FIGURES 15‑18 View FIGURES 19‑23 View FIGURES 24‑29 )

Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995:325 View in CoL , 327, 328; Pereira & Minelli, 1996:110; Adis et al., 1996:166, 168; Pereira et al., 2000:8; Foddai et al., 2000:153; 2002:473; 2004:276; Bonato et al., 2007:3; Pereira, 2010:660.

New material examined: BRAZIL: Amazonas : secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W), 3 January 1991, M.O. de A. Ribeiro leg.: 1 male (Specimen “A”) with 63 leg-bearing segments, body length 30 mm ( MLP); same locality and collector, 28 August 1990: 1 male (Specimen “B”) with 65 leg-bearing segments, body length 29 mm ( MLP) GoogleMaps .

Remarks: The locality cited above, is new for the geographic distribution of this species.

The adult condition of the two specimens listed here is proved by the tubula seminifera full of mature spermatozoa.

The original description by Pereira et al. (1995) was based on females only (holotype, paratype, and a juvenile). Subsequently, no specimens have been reported for this species, thus the male remained unknown until now; the present new material allows the first description of this sex, giving a better understanding of the taxon.

Description

Male (Specimen A): Sixty-three leg-bearing segments, body length 30 mm, maximum body width 0.8 mm.

Features similar to those in the female, except for the shape and chaetotaxy of the ultimate leg-bearing segment and postpedal segments.

Ultimate leg-bearing segment: conspicuously wider than the penultimate leg-bearing segment, in the proportion ca. 1.63: 1; length/width ratio of tergite, 0.63: 1; length/width ratio of sternite: 0.75: 1. Shape and chaetotaxy of tergite and sternite as in Figs. 18 View FIGURES 15‑18 , 19 View FIGURES 19‑23 . Coxopleura with numerous setae on ventral and lateral surfaces, dorsal side with few setae placed near the lateral edges only ( Figs. 18 View FIGURES 15‑18 , 19 View FIGURES 19‑23 ). Coxal organs with shape and relative size as in Figs. 19, 20 View FIGURES 19‑23 . Articles of ultimate legs strongly thickened, subconically narrowing from base to distal end (ratio of width of trochanter/width of tarsus 2, ca. 3.0: 1); ultimate legs relatively longer than those of the female, with ratio length of telopodites/length of sternite, 2.57: 1. Shape and chaetotaxy of ultimate legs as in Figs. 18 View FIGURES 15‑18 , 19 View FIGURES 19‑23 .

Postpedal segments: intermediate tergite with posterior margin strongly convex ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15‑18 ), intermediate sternite and first genital sternite with posterior margin slightly concave ( Figs. 19, 21 View FIGURES 19‑23 ). Gonopods apparently uniarticulate (suture between the presumptive basal and apical articles not evident), right gonopod with 12 setae on ventral side ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19‑23 ). Penis apparently devoid of apical setae, shape as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19‑23 .

Variation: the females recorded up to now have 67 or 69 leg-bearing segments; the males 63 or 65 leg-bearing segments.

The anterior and posterior coxal organs of the female holotype ( Figs. 24, 25 View FIGURES 24‑29 ), and those of female paratype, are roughly similar in size; in contrast, in both males examined here the anterior coxal organs are smaller than the posterior (in the proportion shown in Figs. 19, 20 View FIGURES 19‑23 ). Because there is no doubt about the conspecificity of the present males with the holotype and paratype female, this difference could be interpreted as an intraspecific variation (or artifacts in the temporary microscope slides). More specimens are needed to clarify this issue.

Ecology: The two specimens herein reported were collected in a secondary forest, while the type material comes from a primary rainforest at the Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve, a 100 Km2 high biodiversity area belonging to INPA, located near the city of Manaus. (A description of its geology, soil characteristics and floristic composition is given by Gentry, 1990; Hopkins, 2005, 2007; Penny & Arias, 1982; and Ribeiro et al., 1999).

Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas: Reserva Florestal A. Ducke (02°55’S, 59°59’W) GoogleMaps .

Known range: BRAZIL: Amazonas : Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve (02°55’S, 59°59’W); secondary upland forest (02°34’S, 60°06’W) GoogleMaps .

MLP

Museo de La Plata

INPA

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Chilopoda

Order

Geophilomorpha

Family

Ballophilidae

Genus

Ityphilus

Loc

Ityphilus demoraisi Pereira, Minelli & Barbieri, 1995

Pereira, Luis Alberto 2012
2012
Loc

Ityphilus demoraisi

PEREIRA, L. A. 2010: 660
BONATO, L. & PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. 2007: 3
PEREIRA, L. A. & FODDAI, D. & MINELLI, A. 2000: 8
FODDAI, D. & PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. 2000: 153
PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. 1996: 110
ADIS, J. & MINELLI, A. & DE MORAIS, J. W. & PEREIRA, L. A. & BARBIERI, F. & RODRIGUES, J. M. G. 1996: 166
PEREIRA, L. A. & MINELLI, A. & BARBIERI, F. 1995: 325
1995
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF