Indopolystoma rhacophori (Yamaguti, 1936) n. comb. ( Table 4 ), 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/parasite/2019067 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:71763E07-E6BC-4FB7-94B0-03132D46FFAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13858549 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A11B8782-FF86-FFF0-2605-23E2D53C8EA6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Indopolystoma rhacophori (Yamaguti, 1936) n. comb. ( Table 4 ) |
status |
n. comb. |
Indopolystoma rhacophori (Yamaguti, 1936) n. comb. ( Table 4) View in CoL
Synonym: Polystoma rhacophori Yamaguti, 1936 View in CoL [ 53].
Type-host: Rhacophorus schlegelii var. arborea Okada. Now Zhangixalus arboreus (Okada and Kawano) [ 21].
Site: Bladder.
Type-locality: Kurama, near Kyoto, Japan.
Remarks: Although the author of the original description did not draw the marginal hooklets [ 53], the general morphology of this species, including hamuli shape (unbranched), is consistent with the diagnosis of Indopolystoma . The haptor/ total body length ratio of about 0.18 is bigger than that of any other Indopolystoma spp. with the exception of I. zuoi (Shen, Wang & Fan, 2013) n. comb. As discussed earlier for I. elongatum , which infests the same host, we consider for now that both I. elongatum and I. rhacophori are two separate species primarily on the basis of body length and haptor/ total body length ratio.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Indopolystoma rhacophori (Yamaguti, 1936) n. comb. ( Table 4 )
Chaabane, Amira, Verneau, Olivier & Preez, Louis Du 2019 |
Polystoma rhacophori
Yamaguti 1936 |