Ibotyporanga itajubaquara Huber, 2024

Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S., 2024, Diamonds in the rough: Ibotyporanga (Araneae, Pholcidae) spiders in semi-arid Neotropical environments, European Journal of Taxonomy 963, pp. 1-169 : 141-153

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D8BA391-1F21-45B4-B226-1E033A14EEA1

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:7D8BA391-1F21-45B4-B226-1E033A14EEA1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ibotyporanga itajubaquara Huber
status

sp. nov.

Ibotyporanga itajubaquara Huber sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7D8BA391-1F21-45B4-B226-1E033A14EEA1

Figs 96 View Fig , 121–124 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig

Diagnosis

Distinguished from similar congeners (with split procursus with long dorsal branch; long male palpal patella, i.e., dorsally>1.8×as long as medially wide; wide epigynum, i.e.,>1.9 ×as wide as long; distinct epigynal pocket, i.e., narrow and relatively deep; and sclerite in female internal genitalia) by combination of: procursus main and dorsal branches proximally not overlapping, i.e., with space between them in lateral view ( Fig. 122C View Fig ); male palpal tarsus with large dorsal hump (bold arrow in Fig. 122C View Fig ); and median sclerite in female internal genitalia without posterior constriction ( Figs 123C View Fig , 124D–G View Fig ); from I. kiriri sp. nov. also by cheliceral apophysis ( Fig. 123B View Fig ; directed more forwards and with more slender tip); from I. canudos sp. nov. and I. ouro sp. nov. also by simple evenly curved tip of dorsal branch of procursus, i.e., without ‘buckle’ ( Fig. 122C View Fig ). Females of I. itajubaquara sp. nov. may be indistinguishable morphologically from females of I. kiriri , I. ouro , and I. canudos .

Etymology

The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.

Type material

Holotype

BRAZIL – Bahia • ♂; N of Itajubaquara ; 11.3607° S, 42.6810° W; 840 m a.s.l.; 23 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5972. GoogleMaps

Paratypes

BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5973 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 9052 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24383] GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♀, 1 juv., in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5974 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-212; female abdomen transferred to ZFMK Ar 24383] GoogleMaps 1 ♂; NW of Gameleira do Assuruá ; 11.1942° S, 42.7165° W; 640 m a.s.l.; 23 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5975 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 9053 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24384] GoogleMaps 2 juvs, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5976 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-216] GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.9, carapace width 0.73. Distance PME–PME 65 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME–ALE 25 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm; diameter AME 45 µm. Leg 1: 4.17

(1.13+0.30 +1.03 +1.28 + 0.43), tibia 2: 0.87, tibia 3: 0.80, tibia 4: 1.20; tibia 1 L/d: 10; diameters of leg femora 0.18–0.20; of leg tibiae 0.10–0.11.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs ochre-yellow, carapace medially with darker Y-mark, legs without darker rings; abdomen pale gray with many darker internal marks; ventrally with light ochre plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.

BODY. Habitus as in I. ouro sp. nov. (cf. Fig. 73G View Fig ). Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum wider than long (0.54/0.47), with very low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1 not different from those of female. Abdomen globular.

CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 123A–B View Fig ; width 0.32; with strong median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files very fine and poorly visible in dissecting microscope.

PALPS. As in Fig. 121 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with short ventral process; femur proximally with distinct retrolateral process directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints not shifted toward one side; patella dorsally ~1.9 × as long as medially wide; tibia with two trichobothria in relatively proximal position; tibia-tarsus joints slightly shifted toward retrolateral side; tarsus with strong dorsal hump (bold arrow in Fig. 122C View Fig ); procursus ( Fig. 122A– C View Fig ) with long dorsal branch distally flattened (wider in dorsal than in lateral view), main branch with light prolateral band, tiny subdistal side-branch, distally transparent and curved backwards; genital bulb ( Fig. 122D–F View Fig ) with prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, embolus tip simple, without distinctive sclerotized elements.

LEGS. Without spines but with longer hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with short vertical hairs on tibiae 1 and 2; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 60%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~3–4 pseudosegments, only distally distinct.

Variation (male) Tibia 1 in three other males: 0.97, 1.07, 1.07. The species delimitation analysis ( Fig. S7 View Fig ) suggested a possible split between the sequenced specimen from N of Itajubaquara and the specimen from NW of Gameleira do Assuruá. The K2P distance between them was 10.2%. However, no morphological differences could be found in males.

Female

In general, similar to male but clypeus unmodified, tibia 1 with few vertical hairs. Tibia 1 in three females: 1.07, 1.13, 1.17. Epigynum ( Fig. 124A–C View Fig ) anterior plate trapezoidal, posterior margin almost straight, with distinct anterior pocket; posterior plate large but simple. Internal genitalia ( Figs 123C View Fig , 124D–E View Fig ) with pair of elongated pore plates posteriorly, strongly sclerotized median structure, and very thin-walled large anterior membranous expandable sac. In the cleared female from NW of Gameleira do Assuruá, the internal sclerotized median structure is longer than in the cleared female from the type locality ( Fig. 124F–G View Fig ). Since males from the two localities appear indistinguishable, this is here interpreted to represent intraspecific variation.

Distribution

Known from two neighboring localities (distance 19 km) in Brazil, Bahia ( Fig. 96B View Fig ).

Natural history

At the type locality, the spiders were found under rocks fully exposed to the sun in a degraded shrubland with scattered trees. Upon turning the rocks, the spiders ran extremely fast and were thus difficult to catch. At the second locality, a rocky outcrop with thorny shrubs and trees, the spiders were mostly found under rocks, one female under the bark of a dead branch lying on the ground.

Ibotyporanga canudos Huber sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E4DFC4B5-599A-4B8D-AA79-C2E974F23449

Figs 22E View Fig , 23H View Fig , 73H View Fig , 96 View Fig , 125–128 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig ; SEM Figs 3C–D View Fig , 5B, F View Fig , 9C–D View Fig , 12C–D View Fig , 16F View Fig , 17F View Fig , 18H View Fig , 20B View Fig

Diagnosis

Distinguished from similar congeners (with split procursus with long dorsal branch; long male palpal patella, i.e., dorsally>1.8×as long as medially wide; wide epigynum, i.e.,>1.9 ×as wide as long; distinct epigynal pocket, i.e., narrow and relatively deep; and sclerite in female internal genitalia) by combination of: procursus main and dorsal branches proximally not overlapping, i.e., with space between them in lateral view ( Fig. 126C View Fig ); male palpal tarsus with large dorsal hump (arrow in Fig. 126C View Fig ); and median sclerite in female internal genitalia without posterior constriction ( Figs 127C View Fig , 128D–G View Fig ); from I. itajubaquara sp. nov. and I. kiriri sp. nov. also by tip of dorsal branch of procursus with distinct ‘buckle’, i.e., not evenly curved ( Fig. 126C View Fig ); from I. ouro sp. nov. also by smaller distance between dorsal and main branches of procursus (compare Figs 118C View Fig and 126C View Fig ). Females of I. canudos sp. nov. may be indistinguishable morphologically from females of I. itajubaquara , I. ouro , and I. kiriri .

Etymology

The species name remembers the autonomous movement at Canudos (now flooded by the Cocorobó Dam), which was the scene of violent clashes between peasants and police in the 1890s. Eventually, the Brazilian army killed the survivors and destroyed the village; noun in apposition.

Type material

Holotype

BRAZIL – Bahia • ♂; 25 km WNW of Morro do Chapéu ; 11.475° S, 41.369° W; 760 m a.s.l.; 26 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5977. GoogleMaps

Paratypes

BRAZIL – Bahia • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5978 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; UFMG 31662 View Materials GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 9054 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24385] GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♂, 7 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5979 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-230] GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; 16 km SW of Morro do Chapéu, at Buraco do Possidônio ; 11.6467° S, 41.2713° W; 970 m a.s.l.; 27 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5980 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5981 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-233] GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 1 ♀; 16 km SW of Morro do Chapéu, near Buraco do Possidônio ; 11.6473° S, 41.2694° W; 980 m a.s.l.; 3 Sep. 2015; L.S. Carvalho and G. Santana leg.; CHNUFPI 3700 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding but 5 Sep. 2015; CHNUFPI 3961, 3963 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3962, 4204 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀; 10 km SW of Morro do Chapéu ; 11.6130° S, 41.2339° W; 1010 m a.s.l.; 27 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5982 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, 1 juv., in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5983 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-234; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ used for SEM] GoogleMaps 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; 5 km NE of Morro do Chapéu ; 11.5034° S, 41.1281° W; 980 m a.s.l.; 27 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5984 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 9064 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24386] GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 5 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5985 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-235] GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 7 ♀♀; SE of Lagoa do Boi ; 11.942° S, 41.717° W; 840 m a.s.l.; 21 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5986 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 9065 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24387] GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 3 juvs, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5987 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-203] GoogleMaps 4 ♀♀; NW of Ibipeba ; 11.540° S, 42.170° W; 590–640 m a.s.l.; 22 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5988 GoogleMaps 4 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5989 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-208] GoogleMaps 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; 4 km SW of Andorinha ; 10.3668° S, 39.8636° W; 470 m a.s.l.; 28–29 Nov. 2022; B.A. Huber and A.S. Michelotto leg.; CHNUFPI 5990 GoogleMaps 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5992 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24388] GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀, 1 juv., in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 5991 [deposited in ZFMK Br 22-239] GoogleMaps .

Assigned tentatively (no males available)

BRAZIL – Bahia • 2 ♀♀; 14 km ESE of Central , rural area near BA-052; 11.1703° S, 41.9827° W; 770 m a.s.l.; 25 Aug. 2016; L.S. Carvalho and B. T. Faleiro leg.; CHNUFPI 3715, 3766 GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.7, carapace width 0.77. Distance PME–PME 55 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME–ALE 30 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm; diameter AME 40 µm. Leg 1: 4.14

(1.13+0.30 +1.03 +1.25 + 0.43), tibia 2: 0.90, tibia 3: 0.83, tibia 4: 1.28; tibia 1 L/d: 10; diameters of leg femora 0.18–0.19; of leg tibiae 0.10.

COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma ochre-yellow, carapace medially with narrow darker band, ocular area and clypeus not darkened; legs ochre, with darker rings subdistally on femora and tibiae (darkening gradually towards distal rather than distinct rings); abdomen gray with many darker internal marks; ventrally with light ochre plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.

BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 73H View Fig . Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum wider than long (0.52/0.46), with very low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1 not different from those in female. Abdomen globular.

CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 127A–B View Fig ; width 0.28; with strong but short median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files very fine and poorly visible in dissecting microscope.

PALPS. As in Fig. 125 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with short rounded ventral process; femur proximally with distinct retrolateral process slightly directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints not shifted toward one side; patella dorsally ~1.9 × as long as medially wide; tibia with two trichobothria in relatively proximal position; tibia-tarsus joints slightly shifted toward retrolateral side; tarsus with large dorsal hump (arrow in Fig. 126C View Fig ); procursus ( Fig. 126A–C View Fig ) split into long dorsal and main (ventral) branches; dorsal branch narrow in lateral view, wide in dorsal view, distally with distinctive ‘buckle’ and slightly curved towards prolateral; main branch with light prolateral band, slightly wider in lateral view than in dorsal view, with tiny subdistal side-branch, distally transparent and curved backwards; genital bulb ( Fig. 126D–F View Fig ) with prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, embolus tip simple, without distinctive sclerotized elements.

LEGS. Without spines but with longer hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with short vertical hairs on tibiae 1 and 2; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 59%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~3–4 pseudosegments, only distally distinct.

Variation (male)

Tibia 1 in 36 males (incl. holotype): 0.90–1.17 (mean 1.01). The species delimitation analysis ( Fig. S7 View Fig ) suggested a possible split between the sequenced specimen from SW of Andorinha and the other three sequenced specimens; the respective K2P distances ranged from 10.1 to 12.1%. However, no morphological differences could be found, neither in males nor in females.

Female

In general, similar to male but ocular area and clypeus slightly darker, legs darker ochre but without or with less distinct dark rings, clypeus unmodified, leg tibiae with few vertical hairs. Tibia 1 in 63 females: 0.98–1.30 (mean 1.11). Epigynum ( Fig. 128A–C View Fig ) anterior plate much wider than long, posterior margin weakly indented, with distinct narrow anterior pocket; posterior plate large but simple. Internal genitalia ( Figs 127C View Fig , 128D–G View Fig ) with strongly sclerotized median structure and very thin-walled large anterior expandable membranous sac; pore plates elongate, integrated into posterior arc.

Distribution

Known from several localities in northeastern central Bahia, Brazil ( Fig. 96B View Fig ).

Natural history

At the type locality, a hillside with rocky fields, the spiders were found under rocks on soil; in a neighboring area with stones on a flat rock outcrop they were not found. At Buraco do Possidônio, the spiders were beaten out of a dead bromeliad and from dead wood lying on the ground in savanna with shrubs and scattered trees. NE of Morro do Chapéu, most specimens were beaten out of large tree trunks lying on bare rock ( Fig. 22E View Fig ). SE of Lagoa do Boi, they were also beaten out of dead wood in a highly degraded savanna with scattered trees and shrubs. SW of Morro do Chapéu, the spiders were abundant under rocks from road construction in the roadside shrubland ( Fig. 23H View Fig ). NW of Ibipeba, they were found under rocks on a hillside with scattered trees and thorny shrubs. SW of Andorinha, they were found in dead wood on a hillside with thorny shrubs and scattered trees. When beaten out of their shelters, the spiders either feigned death or they ran rapidly until touching a piece of ‘dirt’ where they stopped abruptly. None of the habitats was shared with another species of Ninetinae . Eleven egg sacs had diameters of 1.6–2.0 and contained ~12– 25 eggs each (mean ~20), with egg diameters of 0.56–0.58.

Sampling biases

On average, points of occurrences of Ibotyporanga representatives are located at 0.51 (± 0.94) km from access routes ( Fig. 129 View Fig ). This distance is significantly smaller (d.f. =1, F =23.14, p <0.000) than distances to random points selected at a 20 km radius buffer around the points of occurrences (1.40 ± 1.87 km). Localities more than 1.89 km from access routes were less sampled than expected by chance ( Fig. 129 View Fig ). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of Ibotyporanga species varied from 0.13 to 4 955 630 km ² (median =10 449 km ²; see Table S2). When I. naideae was excluded from the analysis, the proximity of access routes did not significantly explain the EOO (d.f. =1, F =0.086, p=0.776; Fig. S10 View Fig ). Ibotyporanga naideae had a much larger EOO and mean distance of records from access routes (n =57; 5.8± 28.7 km; see Table S2), compared to the other species. Including this synanthropic and widespread species in the analysis resulted in a significant relation between EOO and distance from access routes (d.f. =1, F =56.721, p <0.000).

The environmental niche occupied by Ibotyporanga species from Brazil shows a low overlap with records of species from Colombia and Venezuela, suggesting that these taxa occupy slightly different environments ( Fig. 130 View Fig ). The first principal component (PC) explained 38.0% of the variance (Table S3), being positively related to the mean temperature of the coldest quarter, the mean temperature of the driest quarter and the annual mean temperature (Table S4). The second PC explained 22.5% of the variation (Table S3), being positively associated with the precipitation of the driest quarter, the precipitation of the driest month and the aridity index (Table S4).

The species distribution modeling (SDM) was based on four principal components that encompassed 86.0% of the predictor layers’ variation (see Tables S5–S7). Three areas with higher relative occurrence rate were identified: (1) the Caatinga and Cerrado provinces in northeastern Brazil; (2) the Western Ecuador and Ecuadorian provinces; and (3) the Venezuelan province ( Fig. 131 View Fig ). Not included in these areas are the type-locality of I. kanoe sp. nov. in the state of Rondônia and several localities with records of I. naideae , even in natural environments ( Fig. 131 View Fig ). Although the ordination showed a low overlap between Brazilian and non-Brazilian species and the SDM did not support a high relative occurrence rate for the Colombian and Venezuelan points of occurrences, the environmental niche of Ibotyporanga evolved following the expectations of a Brownian motion in all analyzed scenarios (see Tables S8–S10).

Karyology

The testes of the analyzed males contained both spermatogonial mitoses and meiotic cells. Both species analyzed had the same diploid number (30) ( Fig. 132B, H View Fig ) and sex chromosome system X 1 X 2 X 3 Y ( Fig. 132G–H View Fig ). Metaphases of spermatogonial mitosis were composed of 30 chromosomes including the Y chromosome ( Fig. 132A–B View Fig ). The two studied species differed in the size of this element. While it was a small chromosome in both species, it was much bigger in I. naideae (2.8+ 0.61 µm, n= 4; Fig. 132A View Fig ) than in Ibotyporanga sp. (0.98+ 0.12 µm, n= 7; Fig. 132B View Fig ). The Y chromosome of I. naideae was metacentric and slightly positively heteropycnotic (i.e., stained more intensively than the other chromosomes) in some mitotic plates ( Fig. 132A View Fig ). The morphology of this element was not resolved in Ibotyporanga sp. In the interphase nucleus before meiosis, sex chromosomes formed a positively heteropycnotic, highly condensed mass at the periphery of the nucleus. In addition to this mass, some nuclei included a rod-shaped element exhibiting a slight positive heteropycnosis ( Fig. 132C View Fig ). The early prophase of the first meiotic division (leptotene-pachytene) was followed by a stage characterized by a considerable decondensation of chromosome pairs (so-called diffuse stage). On the contrary, the sex chromosomes were positively heteropycnotic and highly condensed, forming a cluster or body at the periphery of the nucleus. One bivalent often showed positive heteropycnosis ( Fig. 132D–E View Fig ). Late prophase I and metaphase I contained 13 bivalents, each with one chiasma. Although the sex chromosomes were considerably decondensed at these stages ( Fig. 132F View Fig ), the mode of their pairing was evident in some plates. Each X chromosome formed a loop, which paired by its ends with a Y chromosome ( Fig. 132G View Fig ). In late prophase I, a large bivalent exhibited positive heteropycnosis except for the chiasma region ( Fig. 132F View Fig ). Two types of metaphases II were found, one with 14 chromosomes including the Y chromosome, the other with 16 chromosomes including the three X chromosomes ( Fig. 132H View Fig ). The morphology of the chromosomes in metaphase II shows that most if not all chromosomes are biarmed. The X chromosomes did not differ in condensation intensity from the other chromosomes at this stage ( Fig. 132H View Fig ). In contrast to this, the Y chromosome was positively heteropycnotic in some metaphases II of I. naideae ( Fig. 132I View Fig ).

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Ibotyporanga

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF