Heteromysis (Olivemysis) schoenbrunnensis, Wittmann & Abed-Navandi & Dubois & Chevaldonné, 2021

Wittmann, Karl J., Abed-Navandi, Daniel, Dubois, Maude & Chevaldonné, Pierre, 2021, Three new species of Heteromysis (Crustacea: Mysida) from coral reef aquaria in Florida and Central Europe, Zootaxa 4980 (3), pp. 490-520 : 505-515

Heteromysis (Olivemysis) schoenbrunnensis sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C7AFB9EE-D0EC-4FF8-9D8B-511DCBB3338

Figs 8–13

Holotype. Adult male with 4.7 mm body length ( NHMW –27023), shrimp aquaria behind filtration sump of coral reef aquaria at Schönbrunn-Zoo, Vienna, Austria, May 2020, leg. Daniel Abed-Navandi.

Paratypes. 10 M ad. 3.2–5.3 mm, 1 F ad. 4.5 mm, 3 subad. ( USNM –1642206) in vials, same sample as for holotype; 2 F ad. 4.3–4.7 mm, 2 M ad. 3.9–4.7 mm ( MNINGA MYS 442 ) in vial, filtration sump of coral reef aquaria, remaining collection data as for holotype ; 3 F ad. 4.6–5.2 mm, 5 M ad. 3.8–5.1 mm, 1 F subad. ( USNM –1642205) in vials, plus 1 F ad. 4.9 mm ( NHMW –27022) and 1 M ad. 4.8 mm ( NHMW –27021) on slides, Feb. 2020, remaining collection data as before; 1 F ad. 6.0 mm ( NHMW –27024) in vial, collection data as for holotype ; 1 M ad. 4.9 mm ( NHMW –27025) in vial, collection data as for holotype ; 3 F ad. 5.5–6.0 mm, 3 M ad. 4.6–6.1 mm ( USNM –1642207) in vial, collection data as for holotype ; 3 F ad. 4.5–5.7 mm, 1 M ad. 4.5 mm ( NHMW –27026) in vial, Dec. 2020, remaining collection data as for holotype ; 3 F ad. 4.2–5.7 mm, 12 M ad. 3.2–5.6 mm, 1 F subad. ( USNM –1642208) in vial, filtration sump of coral reef aquaria, Dec. 2020, remaining collection data as for holotype .

Material sequenced. 18S and COI barcodes here provided for 1 M ad. from same sample as for holotype, deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MW591705 and MW596478 .

Type locality. Not defined because the locality of origin ought to be indicated according to Art. 76.1.1. of the nomenclatorial code ( ICZN, 1999). The species was first discovered from coral reef aquaria and service tanks at Schönbrunn-Zoo in Vienna ( Austria).

Derivatio nominis. The species name is a Latinized adjective with feminine location suffix, referring to the world’s oldest existing zoo, namely Schönbrunn-Zoo located in the historical imperial park of Schönbrunn.

Diagnosis. Carapace normal, rostrum ( Fig. 9A, D ) triangular with acute tip, 0.6–0.8 times length of terminal segment of antennular trunk (measured along dorsal median line). Antero-lateral edges of carapace well rounded. Eyes ( Fig. 9A–C ) well developed, thick. Cornea occupies distal third of eye surface. Eyestalks with a prominent tooth on disto-mesial edge.

Antennulae ( Fig. 9A, G–K ). The three segments of antennular trunk ( Fig. 9A, G ) each with a setose dorsal apophysis. Apophysis of basal segment with blade-like spine (modified seta) apically bearing a minute spiniform process and 3–5 cilia ( Fig. 9J ). Lateral lobe of basal segment, dorsal apophysis, and disto-mesial edge of the median segment, each with one whip seta ( Fig. 9I ) plus barbed setae. Disto-mesial edge of terminal segment with blade-like, subapically flagellate, robust spine ( Fig. 9H ). Appendix masculina small, weakly setose.

Antennae and mouthparts. Antennal scale ( Fig. 9L ) reaches to 40–80% length of terminal segment of antennular trunk in both sexes. Scale length is 2.6–2.9 times maximum width. Scale with small apical segment. Mouthparts ( Figs 9M–N , 10A–E ) normal; labrum not produced into a spiniform process.

Thorax. Only the males with median processes from thoracic sternites 1–8, in part flanked by additional submedian processes ( Fig. 10F ; anterior lobe of sternite 1 not counted as a process of that kind). Both sexes with flagellum of thoracic exopod 1 showing eight segments, exopods 2–8 with nine segments. Carpopropodus of thoracic endopods 1–8 with 2, 2, 2, 3–4, 6–7, 6–7, 6–7, and 6 segments, respectively. Claw 1 subapically, unilaterally ( Fig. 10H ) or bilaterally ( Fig. 10G ) serrated; claw 2 not detected (but potentially present in dense jungle of setae); claw 3 strong, smooth ( Fig. 10K ); claw 4 needle-like, smooth ( Fig. 10L ); claws 5–8 well-curved, slender, unilaterally serrated along medial to subapical portions ( Fig. 10M–P ). Claw 3 (measured along its median line) 2.1–3.3 times dactylus length and 26–37% carpopropodus. Claws 1, 4–8 roughly half as long as claw 3 (note varying scales in Fig. 10 ). Penes ( Fig. 11G ) tube-like, 0.6–0.7 times length of ischium 8 and 0.8–1.0 times merus 8. Penes smooth all along, without setae, terminally blunt, ending in 4–5 lobes.

Gnathopods ( Fig. 11A–D ). Shape of thoracic endopod 3 non-dimorphic except for the more rugose mesial margins of ischium and merus in males. Merus without disto-mesial ridge in both sexes. Carpus, propodus, and dactylus separated by distinct sutures. Carpopropodus 7–11% body length in both sexes. Carpopropodus strongly swollen, only 1.9–2.5 times longer than wide ( Fig. 11A, C ). Carpus with 7–11 subapically flagellate spines along distal 50–70% of mesial margin. Propodus without paradactylary setae and without spines.

Pleopods ( Fig. 12 ) rudimentary, unsegmented, with residual differentiation of endopod (pseudobranchial lobe). All female pleopods and male pleopods 1, 2, 5 without spines, with normal setae only. Male pleopod 3 ( Fig. 12C ) with series of 8–11 small, flagellate spines along obliquely truncate, terminal margin; pleopod 4 ( Fig. 12D ) with series of 13–16 even smaller flagellate spines in analogous position.

Tail fan. Uropods ( Fig. 13G ) normal, entire; exopod extends by 18–27% its length beyond endopod; endopod with 3–4 spines near statocyst on mesial margin, distal spine-free portion is 2/3 length of endopod. Telson ( Fig. 13H ) subtriangular, length 1.1–1.4 times its maximum width, 0.7–0.8 times exopod of uropod. Each lateral margin of telson with 9–10 spines on distal 50–70%, proximal portion smooth. Disto-lateral lobes each with two spines on narrowly truncate apex; latero-apical spines are 9–13% telson length; medio-apical spines are 0.6–0.8 times length of latero-apical spines. U-shaped apical cleft penetrates 30–33% telson length; proximal 25–40% of the cleft with 13–15 laminae, distally remaining portion with smooth parallel margins.

Description. All features of the diagnosis plus the above listed features shared by the three here described species. General appearance robust ( Fig. 8A–D ). Size of adults is 4.2–6.0 mm (n = 17) in females and 3.2–6.1 mm (n = 36) in males. Cephalothorax comprises 30–42% body length, pleon 46–62%, carapace 27–38%, and rostrum 3–4%. Abdominal somites 1–5 measure 0.5–0.7, 0.5–0.8, 0.6–0.9, 0.7–0.9, and 0.7–0.9 times the length of somite 6, respectively.

Carapace ( Fig. 9A, D–F ). Rostrum covers basal portions of normal-oriented eyestalks. It reaches at most to the middle of artificially straight forward-oriented eyestalks (without cornea). Antero-lateral edges of carapace not visually projecting in situ whereas minimally projecting in artificially expanded carapace ( Fig. 9D ). Posterior margin leaves 0.5–1.3 ultimate thoracic somite mid-dorsally exposed. As in many species of Mysidae , two characteristic groups of pores present medially on carapace. The anterior group ( Fig. 9E ) is directly in front of the cervical sulcus and consists of 12–18 pores with about 1 µm diameter in a roughly V-shaped arrangement. The posterior pore group ( Fig. 9F ) is more distant from the posterior margin of carapace; this group consisting of 10–12 such pores surrounding a larger but indistinct, rounded structure. Except for the here stated structures, outer surface of carapace smooth in both sexes.

Eyes ( Figs 8A–E , 9A–C ). Eyestalks and cornea dorsoventrally weakly compressed. Eyestalks with scales along mesial and proximal face. Cornea diameter 0.8–1.1 times the length of apical segment of antennular trunk. In dorsal view the cornea appears calotte-shaped, measuring 0.5–0.7 times eyestalk length (cornea not included; cornea appears enlarged in Fig. 9C due to the pressure exerted by cover glass). In lateral view ( Fig. 9B ), cornea oviform to oval with upper margin (= face) flattened.

Antennulae ( Fig. 9A, G–K ). No sexual dimorphism except for the exclusive presence of the appendix masculina in males. Trunk extends 50–70% its length beyond eyes. Measured along dorsal midline, the basal segment is 42–47% trunk length, median 14–20%, and terminal 34–38%. Basal segment on basal half of its lateral face with 2–4 small setae bearing long barbs ( Fig. 9K ). Its dorsal apophysis with 3–4 barbed setae, a whip seta, and a bladelike, apically modified spine (modified seta; Fig. 9J ). Lateral lobe with one plumose, 2–3 shorter barbed setae, and a whip seta. Median segment with one plumose and one small, whip seta ( Fig. 9I ) on disto-mesial edge. Dorsally it bears a large apophysis with 3–4 barbed plus a whip seta. Terminal segment 1.1–1.2 times longer than wide. Its mid-dorsal apophysis with 3–4 barbed setae, with small cilia lining the disto-mesial margin; no spiniform anterior projection. Disto-mesial edge of terminal segment with one flagellate, blade-like spine ( Fig. 9H ) flanked by one large, smooth seta facing disto-laterally, plus two anteriorly directed plumose setae. Distal 20–30% of the flagellate spine with 3–4 tubercles on its anterior margin in addition to the distinct flagellum on posterior margin. In both sexes the lateral antennular flagellum is thicker than the mesial one by a factor of 1.4–1.8 when measured near basis of flagella. Male lobe weakly setose, inserts ventrally close to terminal margin of antennular trunk, broadly rounded, length is 17–21% width of terminal segment of trunk, its width 21–24%. Epi-antennular process (sub)-triangular with blunt tip, hypo-antennular process triangular with acute tip ( Fig. 9G ).

Antennae ( Fig. 9A, L ). Sympod ( Fig. 9L ) dorsally with terminally rounded, tongue-like process. Lateral edge of sympod with short, anteriorly directed, subtriangular process; ventrally with crescent-shaped shield (dashed line in Fig. 9L ) proximally behind antennal trunk; shield 3.0–3.5 times longer than its maximum width. Sympod caudally with bulbous lobe containing end sac of antennal gland. The three-segmented antennal peduncle with basal segment 16–22% peduncle length, second 42–48%, and third 31–35%. Antennal scale reaches clearly beyond antennal peduncle; scale with slightly convex, almost straight lateral margin and with strongly convex mesial margin; scale setose all around. Short, broad apical segment with 5–8% total scale length is separated by a transverse suture. Apical segment with five plumose setae.

Mouthparts ( Figs 9M–N , 10A–E ). Mandibular palp three-segmented ( Fig. 10A ). Its proximal segment without setae, 12–17% length of palp. Median segment 61–76% palp length. Its length 2.3–3.1 times maximum width. Its lateral margin all along with 15–17 whip setae. Mesial margin with one subapical seta, followed by a smooth median portion, and on proximal half by series of 6–8 setae increasing in length distally. Mid-caudal face of median segment with 0–2 setae (zero in Fig. 10A ). Rostral face (below drawing plane in Fig. 10A ) near mesio-basal edge with small field of minute triangular scales (arrow in Fig. 10A ; size and shape of scales as in Fig. 2M ). Terminal segment strongly setose, 19–25% palp length. Pars molaris with well-developed grinding surface in both mandibles. Pars incisiva with 4–5 teeth, digitus mobilis with 3–4 teeth, and pars centralis with 3–4 spiny teeth.

Maxillula ( Fig. 10C–D ). Distal segment of maxillula ( Fig. 10C ) terminally with 11–14 strong, mostly smooth spines, only the inner-most spine with two subapical denticles; this segment subterminally with three setae barbed on their distal 2/3; transverse series of three pores (diameter ca. 1.2 μm, Fig. 10D ) closely adjoining the outer (= most ventral) seta. Endite of maxillula terminally with three distally spiny setae accompanied by three proximally thick barbed setae; mesial and lateral margins of the endite with numerous less thick setae.

Maxilla ( Fig. 10E ) with 13–16 barbed setae all along lateral margin of exopod, the two apical setae larger than the remaining ones. Most basal portion of exopod with cilia (minute smooth setae) beneath and between the plumose setae. Basal segment of endopod with three basally thick, barbed setae. Terminal segment 1.6–1.9 times longer than wide.

Thoracic sternites ( Fig. 10F, I ). Male sternites 2–7 with tooth-like median processes increasing in size caudally. Sternites 2–6 with additional, smaller, paired, submedian processes, fully tooth-like only at sternites 4–6 where they merge with the median process to form a strong trident. Sternite 8 with a single, elongate spine-like process in median position. Sternite 1 with large anterior lobe whose distal half is triangular with blunt apex in both sexes. Only in males this lobe bears a small, rounded ventral process, probably homologous with the median processes on sternites 2–8.

Thoracopods general ( Figs 10F–H, J–P ; 11 ). Length of flagella as well as of basal plates increases from exopod 1 to 6, and decreases from exopod 6 to 8. Basal plates ( Figs 10F ; 11A, G ) weakly expanded, length 1.5–1.8 times width in both sexes. Lateral margin of the plates ends in a narrowly rounded edge. The first thoracopods with large, leaf-like, smooth epipod ( Fig. 10F ). Length of endopods increases in series of thoracopods 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, and remains subequal among endopods 5–8. Basis of endopods 4–8 ( Fig. 11E–G ) with a small, lappet-like apophysis on rostral face below endopod; no such apophysis in endopods 1–3 ( Figs 10F, J ; 11A ). Ischium becomes increasingly slender from endopods 1 to 5, and length of ischium increases in series of endopods 1, 2, 3≈4, 5; both these measurements remain (sub)-equal among endopods 5–8. Ischium shorter than merus in endopods 1–4 ( Figs 10F, J ; 11A, E ), subequal in endopod 5, but longer than merus in endopods 6–8 ( Fig. 11G ). Thoracic endopods 1–3 each with dactylus ( Figs 10F, J ; 11A, C ) larger than that of endopods 4–8 ( Fig. 11E, G ). Combined praeischium plus ischium of endopod 2 ( Fig. 10J ) are 0.7–0.9 times merus length, carpopropodus plus dactylus 1.0–1.3 times merus. Dactylus very large, with dense brush formed by great numbers of normal setae and 10–14 modified setae, the latter apically bent, bearing two symmetrical series of denticles (stiff barbs) on either side in subbasal to median portions. Carpopropodus of endopod 4 ( Fig. 11E ) densely furnished with smooth simple setae and whip setae, no other types of setae. When stretched anteriorly, endopod 8 ( Fig. 11G ) reaches to the maxilla or up to basis of antenna; when stretched posteriorly to basis or end of pleonite 5.

Gnathopods ( Fig. 11A–D ). Thoracic endopod 3 forms a powerful subchela. Basis with distinct but much shorter endite compared to that ( Fig. 10J ) of endopod 2. Ischium and merus strong, as normal in gnathopods. Ischium 1.7−2.0 times as long as wide; merus 2.4−2.7 times as long as wide and 1.5−1.8 times length of ischium. Series of 5−6 unilaterally barbed whip setae ( Fig. 11B ) along (near) lateral face of merus, plus a single whip seta in subterminal position; series of normal barbs (cilia) along median to subapical portions of the setae; no modified barbs. Distal half of ischium with 4–6 short whip setae on mesial margin, each whip seta on the tip of a short triangular projection ( Fig. 11A ) in males, projections even shorter in females. Proximal 50–60% of merus with 4–7 short whip setae on mesial margin, the whip setae alternating with longer smooth setae; no triangular projections. Carpopropodus length 0.9–1.1 times merus, 1.1–1.5 times ischium. Carpus ( Fig. 11A, C ) with spines arranged in series of 3–5 pairs in proximal position and 1–3 stand-alone spines in more distal position. Within pairs, the rostral spine larger than the caudal one. Most of these spines irregularly ‘serrated’ (rugose; Fig. 11D ) along their anterior and posterior margins. The most proximal spines may be weakly serrated or not so.

Marsupium ( Fig. 11F ). The large oostegites 1, 2 near basis with 3–6 setae which are microserrated along distal half. Ventral and rostral portions of the outer face of only the second oostegite with total of 12–15 small whip setae whose length increases towards the tip of this oostegite. Thoracopod 6 with rudimentary oostegite represented by a small, rounded lobe with three microserrated setae apically ( Fig. 11F ).

Pleopods ( Fig. 12 ). Reduced to small setose, bilobate, or obscurely bilobate plates in both sexes, generally larger in males than in females. Length without setae or spines increases from first to fifth pleopods in females. This series discontinuous in males, with size increasing in series of pleopods 1, 2, 5, 3, 4. For potential presence and numbers of flagellate spines on pleopods, see ‘Diagnosis’ above. Pleopods 3, 4 knife-shaped in males only; each with a single seta at apex ( Fig. 12C–D ); their spines with a subapical flagellum ( Fig. 12F–G ). Compared with pleopod 4 ( Fig. 12G ), the spines of pleopod 3 are larger ( Fig. 12F ), more subtriangular, and on the average less crowded. All setae are plumose or barbed in both sexes (not counting flagellate spines).

Tail fan ( Figs 8F , 13F–H ). Scutellum paracaudale ( Fig. 13F ) sinusoid, well rounded. Exopod of uropods ( Fig. 13G ) with slightly convex lateral margin and clearly convex mesial margin. Its length 1.2–1.4 times endopod. Exopod extends 38–44% its length beyond telson, endopod 21–42% its length beyond telson (partly due to telson inserting more rostrally). Endopod basally with large statocyst, containing normally only one statolith with diameter of 71–92 µm (n = 8 statoliths from five specimens). Statoliths discoidal with shallow fundus and distinct tegmen. Statolith formula 2 + 3 + (5–9) + (4–6) = 16–19 (n = 7). One additional statocyst examined contained a small (61 µm) statolith penetrated by sensory hairs as usual, and a spherical mineral concretion with diameter 32 µm not containing any trace of sensory hairs; both objects mineralized with fluorite. Mysid statocysts with such aberrations are rarely found in nature ( Wittmann & Ariani 2019). Telson ( Fig. 13H ) length 1.2–1.3 times sixth pleonite and 0.8–1.0 times endopod of uropod. Spines on lateral margins almost continuously increasing in size distally. Apical cleft much deeper than wide. Distal portions of cleft smooth; proximal portions lined by acute laminae which are shorter than the spines on distal third of lateral margins of telson.

Color ( Fig. 8 ). The animals appeared reddish to transparent upon aquarium observation. Non-transparent specimens became more light-colored during transport to the lab for microphotography. Eggs and nauplioid larvae yellow, in part with a slight green tinge. Content of foregut, gut, and gonads visible through the (semi)-transparent body. Iridescence of parts of body and appendages visible in Fig. 8 varied with the direction of incident light.

Larvae ( Figs 8B , 13I–J ). In the ethanol-fixed material, 15 out of 17 adult females examined had 2– 9 eggs or larvae in the brood pouch; two lacked a brood. Totals of nine eggs, 31 nauplioid larvae, and 28 postnauplioid larvae were available for measurements. Two females with 4.2–5.7 mm body length carried 2– 7 eggs with diameter 0.38–0.43 mm. Two females 4.7–4.8 mm carried 3–4 nauplioid larvae at substage N1 with body length 0.76–0.89 mm, four females 4.5–5.7 mm had 2–6 N2 with 0.83–1.04 mm, one female 6.0 mm had nine N3 with 0.89–1.07 mm. Two females with 4.9–6.0 mm carried 4–8 postnauplioid larvae at substage P2 with 1.13–1.52 mm, four females with 4.5-5.7 mm had 2–6 P3 with 1.40–1.80 mm. A crude estimate suggests that the larvae attain 1/3 parent length shortly before the moult that leads to the free-living juvenile stage. Six mounted nauplioid larvae ( Fig. 13I ) with smooth cuticle all around except for tip of abdomen, which bears numerous spine-like setae ( Fig. 13J ). No caudal furca. Remaining features in Fig. 13I are typical of the state of development.

Foregut ( Fig. 13A–E ). Lateralia anteriorly with dense series of slender, apically coronate spines arranged in a lateral group of short spines with smooth shaft ( Fig. 13B ) and a mesial group of long spines armed with loose series of small denticles along the shaft ( Fig. 13E ). The latter type of spines also on median lobes of the lateralia. Lateralia more caudally with separate group of 6–9 apically pronged, serrated spines ( Fig. 13C ). Dorsolateral infoldings with three longer, apically pronged spines which are serrated ( Fig. 13D ) along distal 50–60% of the shaft.

Gut contents of four specimens were mainly crustacean remains (copepods, Artemia ), minor amounts of unidentifiable material and mineral particles.

Aquarium observations. The mysids hovered close to surfaces in dark areas of the aquarium and the connected filtration sumps: they cruised mainly above the bottoms and walls with the ventral side of the body facing the substrate. The movement patterns were parallel to the respective surface, and of a stop-and-go type. The mysids swam to and fro, mostly along predominantly linear, constant courses. Loose aggregations were formed by less than five specimens; in these aggregations a size-specific segregation was apparent. Occasionally, larger animals showed a chasing-like behavior, during which the speed was quickly accelerated and a short direct encounter occurred.

Figures

FIGURE 2. Heteromysis gulfarii sp. nov. from aquaria in Florida, paratypes, male with body length 3.8 mm (A–E, L–M, O–S: NHMW–27017) and female 3.7 mm (F–K, N: NHMW–27015); A, male antennula together with associated processes from frons, dorsal; B–D, details of male antennula (A) showing whip setae from segments 1–3 of antennular trunk; E, detail of male antennula (A) showing stout barbed setae laterally on basal segment; F, female antennula, dorsal; G–I, details of female antennula (F) showing whip setae from segments 1–3 of antennular trunk; J, antenna, dorsal; K, detail of antenna (J) showing scales dorsally on basal segment of the antennal peduncle; L, mandibular palp, rostral; M, detail of mandibular palp (L) showing scales on rostral face; N, maxillula, caudal; O, male thoracic sternites 1–8; P, dactylus with nail of thoracic endopod 1, setae omitted; Q, tarsus of thoracic endopod 4, rostral; R, detail of tarsus 4 (Q) showing modified seta on rostral face; S, detail of tarsus 4 (Q) showing dactylus with nail, setae omitted.

FIGURE 8. Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), holotype, male with body length 4.7 mm (E: NHMW–27023), paratypes females 4.7 mm (A: MNINGA MYS 442), 6.0 mm (B: NHMW–27024), and male 4.9 mm (C–D, F: NHMW–27025); A, female with nauplioid larvae in brood pouch, lateral; B, female with postnauplioid larvae (dark brown corneas in part visible through transparent body), dorsal; C, male, lateral; D, same male, dorsal; E, cephalothorax of another male, lateral; F, tail fan, dorsal. A, E, CO2-treated living specimens; B–D, F, cold-treated. Photos courtesy of Helmuth Goldammer (Vienna).

FIGURE 9. Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), paratypes, male with body length 4.8 mm (A–B, D–F, N: NHMW–27021), and female 4.9 mm (C, G–M: NHMW–27022); A, anterior body region of male, dorsal aspect, left antennula, right antenna and setae of left antenna omitted, detail (B) shows left eye in lateral view; C, left eye of female, dorsal, object somewhat compressed by pressure exerted by cover glass; D, carapace expanded on slide, details (E–F) showing pore groups; G, female antennula together with associated processes from frons, dorsal; H–K, details of female antennula (G) showing modified spines (H, J) and setae (I, K); L, antenna, dorsal; M, labrum, ventral; N, labium, compared with left lobe, the right one appearing more slender due to artificial, vertical inclination.

FIGURE 10. Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), paratypes, male with body length 4.8 mm (A, C–D, F–G, K–L, N–P: NHMW–27021) and female 4.9 mm (B, E, H–J, M: NHMW–27022); A, left mandible, caudal face, arrow points to field of scales visible through the transparent object with focus on rostral face; B, masticatory portion of right mandible in another specimen; C, maxillula, caudal, detail (D) shows pores of distal segment; E, maxilla, rostral; F, male first thoracopod (caudal) with sternites 1–8 (ventral); G–H, variants of claw of first thoracic endopod; I, female thoracic sternites 1–8; J, second thoracic endopod, caudal; K–P, dactylus with claw in thoracic endopods 3–8, setae omitted, note varying scales.

FIGURE 11. Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), paratypes, male with body length 4.8 mm (A–B, E, G: NHMW–27021) and female 4.9 mm (C–D, F: NHMW–27022); A, right male thoracopod 3, rostral aspect, detail (B) shows barbed whip seta of merus; C, ‘tarsus’ and part of merus of left female thoracic endopod 3, rostral, detail (D) shows flagellate spine of carpopropodus; E, thoracic endopod 4, caudal; F, sympod of thoracic endopod 6 with rudimentary oostegite, rostral; G, male thoracic endopod 8 with basal plate of exopod and penis, caudal.

FIGURE 12. Pleopods in Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), paratypes, male with body length 4.8 mm (A–G: NHMW–27021) and female 4.9 mm (H: NHMW–27022); A–E, series of male pleopods 1–5, rostral face; F–G, details of male pleopods 3 (C) and 4 (D) showing flagellate spines; H, female pleopod 3, rostral.

FIGURE 13. Heteromysis schoenbrunnensis sp. nov. from aquaria in Vienna (Austria), paratypes, female with body length 4.9 mm (A–F: NHMW–27022) and male 4.8 mm (G–H: NHMW–27021). A, cardiac portion of foregut, dorsal view, dorsal wall omitted, details (B–E) showing modified spines; F, scutellum paracaudale, lateral; G, uropods, ventral, setae and ventral wall of statocyst omitted; H, telson; I, nauplioid larva at late substage N2, lateral, detail (J) shows tip of abdomen.