Hemirrhagus coztic, Perez-Miles & Locht, 2003

Mendoza Marroquín, Jorge I., 2014, Taxonomic revision of Hemirrhagus Simon, 1903 (Araneae: Theraphosidae, Theraphosinae), with description of five new species from Mexico, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (Zool. J. Linn. Soc.) 170 (4), pp. 634-689 : 643-648

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12112

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BA11142-CBC1-4026-A578-EBAB6D2B6C0C

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E087B4-5663-FFD0-FE9A-4CA2B1EA1602

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Hemirrhagus coztic
status

 

HEMIRRHAGUS COZTIC View in CoL

PÉREZ- MILES & LOCHT, 2003

( FIGS 5A–G View Figure 5 , 48 View Figure 48 )

Hemirrhagus coztic Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 368 View in CoL , figs 7–10 (D ♀).

Type material: Holotype ♀ LAAH, MEXICO: Cueva de San Juan, Km 92.5 FFCC México-Cuernavaca , Tepoztlan , Morelos 26.xi.1978, Col G. López. Examined. Male unknown.

Additional material examined: 1 ♀ and 1 juvenile LAAH, MEXICO: Cueva de San Juan, Tepoztlan , Morelos 26.xi.1978, col. R. Castellanos .

Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. coztic . Ocular tubercle reduced, all eyes normally developed; periocular pigmentation strongly marked on anterior eye row ( Fig. 5A, E View Figure 5 ). Labial cuspules arranged in two groups ( Fig. 5B, F View Figure 5 ). Urticating setae arranged in one dorsomedian patch, yellowish-orange in colour without well-defined margins, the patch is slightly extended laterally ( Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ). Spermathecae paired, fused at the base, each lobe widely separated at the base almost by one length, broad at base; slightly bent laterally ( Fig. 5G View Figure 5 ). Hemirrhagus coztic differs from all other Hemirrhagus species by the labial cuspules being arranged in two groups.

Distribution and natural history: Known only from Cueva de San Juan, Tepoztlan, Morelos, lives inside the cave ( Fig. 48 View Figure 48 ).

HEMIRRHAGUS ELLIOTTI ( GERTSCH, 1973) View in CoL

( FIGS 2G View Figure 2 , 6A–H View Figure 6 , 48 View Figure 48 )

Schizopelma elliotti Gertsch, 1973: 144 , fig. 2c (D ♀)

Spelopelma elliotti Gertsch, 1982: 91 , fig. 14; Schmidt, 1993: 68, fig. 130; Smith, 1995: 32, figs 12–20; Schmidt, 2003: 117, fig. 65.

Hemirrhagus elliotti Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 372 View in CoL , 373.

Type material: Holotype ♀ AMNH, MEXICO: San Luis Potosí, Municipio (Mpio.) Zaragoza, 5 km north of Valle de los Fantasmas , Cueva de La Laguna , 20.v.1972, col. W. Elliott, P. Lynn, R. M. McEacherm. Examined. Male unknown.

Additional material examined: 1 ♀ AMNH, MEXICO: San Luis Potosí, Mpio. Zaragoza, 40 km east of San Luis Potosí, 5 km to north of Valle de los Fantasmas, Cueva de La Laguna , 20.v.1972, col. W. Elliott, P. Lynn, R. M. McEacherm .

Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. elliotti . Ocular tubercle reduced, PLE slightly integumentary and periocular pigmentation strongly marked on AME ( Fig. 6A, E View Figure 6 ). Urticating setae arranged in one dorsomedian patch, yellowish-orange in colour, with anterior and posterior margins straight ( Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ). Spermathecae bent later- ally, broad at base, tapering distally ( Fig. 6G, H View Figure 6 ). Prolateral face of coxa II and trochanter II without LSC. Hemirrhagus elliotti differs from most Hemirrhagus species in the reduced ocular tubercle with periocular pigmentation strongly marked only on AME. It differs from H. gertschi by the urticating hairs being arranged in only one dorsomedian patch and the spermathecae being bent laterally. The species differs from H. papalotl by lacking LSC on the prolateral face of coxa II and trochanter II and the patch of urticating hairs with anterior and posterior margins being straight.

Redescription: Holotype female: body length (not including chelicerae and spinnerets): 20.31, carapace: 8.98 long, 8.37 wide. Caput not markedly elevated; fovea recurved, width 1.87. Carapace with brown setae ( Fig. 6A View Figure 6 ).

Eyes: anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Periocular pigmentation only present in anterior eye row and strongly marked on AME. PME reduced and PLE slightly integumentary. Eye sizes and interocular distances: AME 0.28; ALE 0.345; PME 0.21; PLE 0.333; AME–AME 0.222; AME–ALE 0.148; PME–PME 0.83; PME–PLE 0.12; ALE–PLP 0.111. Ocular tubercle reduced, width 1.85; length 0.9; clypeus lacking ( Fig. 6E View Figure 6 ). Labium: length 1.1; width 1.9; with 11 cuspules. Maxilla inner corner with approximately 95 cuspules ( Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ). Cheliceral promargin with nine teeth (proximal to distal: first medium, second-third large, fourth-fifth medium, sixth-eighth large, ninth small). Sternum length 4.0. Sigillae semicircular, third and fourth pairs hardly visible; fourth pair once its length from the margin ( Fig. 6B View Figure 6 ).

Leg formula: IV, I, II, III. Length of legs and palpal segments (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 9.60, 4.63, 7.78, 7.78, 6.15, 35.94. II: 8.45, 4.49, 7.31, 7.64, 5.64, 33.53. III: 8.54, 3.87, 6.82, 8.32, 5.74, 33.29. IV: 10.51, 4.22, 9.05, 12.04, 7.03, 42.85. Palp: 7.17, 3.77, 5.63, -, 5.28, 21.85. Spinnerets: PMS, 0.7 long, 1.0 apart; PLS, 2.5 basal, 2.0 middle, 2.3 distal.

Scopulae: tarsi I– IV densely scopulate, III and IV divided by strong band of setae. Metatarsi I and II densely scopulate; III scopulate on distal threequarters and IV scopulate on distal third.

Stridulatory setae: lacking.

Legs and palpi LSC in: palp trochanter prolateral and retrolateral faces, femur prolateral and retrolateral faces; leg I trochanter prolateral face, femur prolateral face.

Chaetotaxy (left side): femora I 1p; II 2p; III 1p, 3r; IV 2p, 3r; palp 2p; patellae none; tibiae I 2p, 9v; II 2p, 11v; III 2p, 9v, 3r; IV 3p, 10v, 4r; palp 1p, 11v; metatarsi I 2v; II 4v; III 3p, 9v, 3r; IV 5p, 12v, 4r.

Genitalia: spermathecae paired, slightly fused, broad at base. Receptacles without neck defined by interior or exterior margin; bent laterally and tapering distally ( Fig. 6G View Figure 6 ).

Genitalia variation: the general shape of the spermathecae is similar, but not strongly bent laterally ( Fig. 6H View Figure 6 ).

Urticating setae: type VI arranged in one dorsomedian patch on the abdomen, yellowish-orange in colour. All margins of the patch well defined, anterior and posterior margins evenly smooth, straight ( Fig. 6C View Figure 6 ).

Colour pattern: live specimens have not been observed. In ethanol the colour is yellowish-brown with the abdomen darker in colour.

Distribution and natural history: Known only from Cueva de la Laguna in San Luis Potosí, México ( Fig. 48 View Figure 48 ). The specimens were collected in a shallow cave, less than 50 m deep; there is nothing known about its life cycle. The cave is located in an oak forest area ( Fig. 2G View Figure 2 ).

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

PMS

Peabody Essex Museum

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Theraphosidae

Genus

Hemirrhagus

Loc

Hemirrhagus coztic

Mendoza Marroquín, Jorge I. 2014
2014
Loc

Hemirrhagus coztic Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 368

Perez-Miles F & Locht A 2003: 368
2003
Loc

Hemirrhagus elliotti Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 372

Perez-Miles F & Locht A 2003: 372
2003
Loc

Spelopelma elliotti

Schmidt G 2003: 117
Smith AM 1995: 32
Schmidt G 1993: 68
Gertsch WJ 1982: 91
1982
Loc

Schizopelma elliotti

Gertsch WJ 1973: 144
1973
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF