Harpactea popovi, Dimitrov & Deltshev & Lazarov, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4568.3.13 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C5822DA-E2B3-45B7-B5D1-C912EB8B22A7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5933325 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C46187FB-CD5A-AC6B-FF5C-BF0FFA8EF86F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Harpactea popovi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Harpactea popovi View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 1– 9 View FIGURES 1–9 , 24.
Type material: Holotype: 1 ♂, Bulgaria, Strandzha mountain , Kachul place, 0 4.08.1999, leg. V. Popov. Paratype: 1 ♂, Strandzha Mts , Gramatikovo village, 0 4.08.1999, leg. V. Popov.
Etymology: Named after the Bulgarian mammalogist Vasil Popov who collected the material.
Diagnosis: Similar to H. ice and H. sturanyi from which it is distinguished by the lack of male palp accessory apophysis, larger and wider conductor, embolus wider at its base, with a distal projection bent almost 90 degrees at its middle part, which is narrower and curved in the other 2 species. ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–9 –18).
Description: Male (holotype): Measurements: Total length 6.00; carapace, length 2.78, width 2.03; sternum length 1.65, width 1.13; chelicerae, length 1.13, width 0.53; abdomen, length 3.23. Coloration: Carapace and chelicerae red-brown ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–9 ). Sternum red-brown, a little lighter than carapace. Abdomen grey to light grey. Legs of the same color as sternum. Chelicerae of the same color as carapace. Eyes ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–9 ): AE separated by 1 ½ of their diameter. PME closer to each other, almost touching. Chelicerae: The whole dorsal surface covered with small black seta-bearing tubercles. Anterior margin with 2 teeth, retromargin with 2 teeth. Proximal tooth on retromargin opposite the space between the teeth on promargin. Leg chaetotaxy and measurements given in Tables 1 and 2.
Palp ( Figs 4–9 View FIGURES 1–9 ): Bulb long and narrow, of irregular shape. Its apical part ends with an extension bearing the embolus and conductor. Conductor with rectangular shape. Embolus bent in a right angle at the middle.
Female unknown.
Distribution: As the species is known only from the type locality, it is tentatively considered a Bulgarian endemic. However, the locality is situated near the Turkish border and it is probable that it could be found in Turkey too ( Fig 24).
Comments: Somatic (presence of spines on coxae IV and patellae III) and genital characters (shape of the male palps) suggest that Harpactea popovi sp. n. belongs to the rubicunda species-group, as defined by Deeleman- Reinhold (1993). The group is abundant in the Eastern Mediterranean, Balkan Peninsula and Asia Minor, rather heterogeneous and probably includes several phyletic lines ( Deeleman-Reinhold 1993). Out of the 51 Harpactea species reported from the Balkan Peninsula, 33 species can be assigned to the rubicunda group. A complete review of the biogeographic patterns and phylogeny of Balkan Harpactea is beyond the scope of this paper, but the Balkan Peninsula has probably played a key role in the diversification of the genus and especially the rubicunda group.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |