Haplodrassus yinae Liu, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1108.85655 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F3EA35E-863A-4137-9EEB-2522B143E8F3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A9BEB099-2D07-4226-B5BF-95D11DD643AC |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:A9BEB099-2D07-4226-B5BF-95D11DD643AC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Haplodrassus yinae Liu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Haplodrassus yinae Liu sp. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3
Haplodrassus montanus Yin et al., 2012: 1177, fig. 627a-f (♂♀).
Material examined.
Holotype ♂, China: Jiangxi Province, Ji’an City, Jinggangshan County Level City , Jinggang Mountain National Nature Reserve , Dongshang Town , Jiangshan Village , 26°46'01.56"N, 113°54'53.65"E, 326 m, 4.II.2021, K. Liu et al. leg GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2 ♂, 1 ♀, the same data as the holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology.
The specific name is a matronym in honour of Prof. Changmin Yin, the first to find and recognise this species, in honour of her great contribution to Chinese arachnology; noun (name) in genitive case.
Diagnosis.
The new species belongs to the Haplodrassus montanus group. The male of the new species is similar to H. guiyangensis Yan & Yu, 2021, H. hatsushibai Kamura, 2007, H. huarong Yin & Bao, 2012, and H. montanus Paik & Sohn, 1984 in having an oval tegulum, a bifurcate embolic apophysis (EA), and a hook-shaped median apophysis (MA), but it can be differentiated from H. hatsushibai and H. montanus by the absence of the basal tooth on the embolus (cf. Figs 1D View Figure 1 , 2A, B View Figure 2 vs Omelko and Marusik 2012: figs 7, 10). In addition, H. yinae sp. nov. possess 5 or 6 ridges on the embolic base (vs 6-8 ridges in H. guiyangensis ; 7 or 8 ridges in H. hatsushibai ; 6 or 7 ridges in H. huarong ; 3 or 4 ridges in H. montanus ) (cf. Fig. 1C, D View Figure 1 vs Yan et al. 2021: figs 1A, C, 2A, B and Omelko and Marusik 2012: figs 7, 8, 10, 11) and has a small tooth-like basal process (BP) directed at 9 o’clock in ventral view (vs 11 o’clock in H. guiyangensis ; a large laminar, tooth-like basal process, directed at 11 o’clock position in H. hatsushibai , H. huarong and H. montanus ) (cf. Figs 1D View Figure 1 , 2A, B View Figure 2 vs Yan et al. 2021: figs 1C, 2B and Omelko and Marusik 2012: figs 7, 10 and Yin et al. 2012: fig. 625f, g). The female of the new species resembles those of H. montanus in having pair of posterior pockets (PP) located in posterolateral part of the atrium, but it can be distinguished by the septum (Se) narrowing posteriorly (vs septum narrowing anteriorly) (cf. Fig. 3C View Figure 3 vs Omelko and Marusik 2012: fig. 20). Also, it can be separated from H. hatsushibai by posterior pockets located in posterolateral part of the atrium (vs posterior pockets located in posteromedial part of the atrium) (cf. Fig. 3C View Figure 3 vs Omelko and Marusik 2012: fig. 23) and from H. huarong by the copulatory ducts (CD) as wide as spermathecae (Sp) (vs 1/3 of spermathecal width) (cf. Fig. 3D View Figure 3 and Yin et al. 2012: fig. 625e).
Description.
Male. Habitus as in Fig. 1A, B View Figure 1 . Total length 3.65. Carapace: 1.89 long, 1.51 wide. Carapace covered with a few strong setae. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.11, PME 0.09, PLE 0.10, AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.03, PME-PME 0.02, PME-PLE 0.05, AME-PME 0.08, AME-PLE 0.12, ALE-ALE 0.24, PLE-PLE 0.33, ALE-PLE 0.04. MOA 0.21 long, front width 0.20, back width 0.23. Chelicera with 4 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth. Abdomen: 1.77 long, 1.21 wide. Leg measurements: I 4.08 (1.1, 0.57, 1.08, 0.69, 0.64); II 3.72 (1.11, 0.62, 0.84, 0.59, 0.56); III 3.06 (0.97, 0.4, 0.56, 0.62, 0.51); IV 4.91 (1.4, 0.58, 1.14, 1.17, 0.62). Leg spination: I Fe: d2, p1; Mt: p1; II Fe: d2; Pa: r1; Ti: v2; III Fe: d2, p1, r1; Ti: d1, p2, r2, v6; Mt: p3, r3, v4; IV: Fe: d2, r1; Pa: r1; Ti: p2, r3, v6; Mt: p2, r2, v6.
Colouration (Fig. 1A, B View Figure 1 ). Carapace, chelicerae and sternum brown. Maxillae and labium reddish brown. Legs yellow. Palps yellow, cymbium brown. Abdomen dark brown, with two pairs of longitudinal yellowish markings anteromedially and four pairs of chevrons posteromedially. Spinnerets yellow.
Palp as in Figs 1C-F View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 . RTA thumb-shaped, 2 × longer than tibia, bearing three strong teeth. Cymbium 2 × longer than wide. Tegulum ovate, with a distinct depression in the anterior part. Sperm duct (SD) stretched along the posterior margin of the tegulum. Embolic apophysis (EA) with three well developed processes: the basal one (BP) hook-shaped and small, directed at 9 o’clock; bases of terminal (TP) and upper processes (UP) touching each other together, forming a fishtail-shape. Upper process and terminal process triangular, approximately the same length. Median apophysis (MA) hook-shaped, twice shorter than embolic apophysis. Embolic base with five or six ridges prolaterally. Apex of embolus bears subterminal process (StP) and lamellar process (LaP).
Female. Habitus as in Fig. 3A, B View Figure 3 . Total length 5.13. Carapace: 1.8 long, 1.33 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.11, PME 0.08, PLE 0.10, AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.02, PME-PME 0.03, PME-PLE 0.06, AME-PME 0.08, AME-PLE 0.13, ALE-ALE 0.22, PLE-PLE 0.34, ALE-PLE 0.06. MOA 0.24 long, front width 0.19, back width 0.22. Chelicera with 4 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth. Abdomen: 3.19 long, 1.86 wide. Leg measurements: I 2.9 (0.88, 0.45, 0.67, 0.44, 0.46); II 3.2 (0.95, 0.49, 0.72, 0.51, 0.53); III 2.49 (0.95, 0.32, 0.41, 0.42, 0.39); IV 3.26 (0.89, 0.43, 0.68, 0.75, 0.51). Leg spination: I Fe: d2, p1; Mt: p1; II Fe: d2; Pa: r1 Ti: v2; III Fe: d2, p1, r1; Ti: d1 p2, r2, v6; Mt: p3, r3, v4; IV: Fe: d2, r1; Pa: r1; Ti: p2, r3, v6; Mt: p2, r2, v6.
Epigyne as in Fig. 3C, D View Figure 3 . Epigyne 1.3 × longer than width. Anterior hood (H) flat, 7 × wider than long. Septum (Se) expands anteriorly. Median pockets (MP) concave backwards. Posterior pockets deep, located at posterolateral part of the atrium. Copulatory openings invisible, arising from median pockets and covered by the margin of median pockets. Copulatory ducts (CD) nearly 3 × longer than width. Spermathecae (Sp) stuck together, as long as wide. Fertilisation ducts (FD) directed laterally.
Distribution.
China: Jiangxi and Hunan provinces (Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Haplodrassus yinae Liu
Liu, Ke-Ke, Yan, Jing, Xiao, Qi-xin, Luo, Chong, Xiao, Yong-hong & Fomichev, Alexander A. 2022 |
Haplodrassus montanus
Liu & Yan & Xiao & Luo & Xiao & Fomichev 2022 |