Hadronotus hrdyae Veenakumari, 2024
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2024.2410028 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC879B-FF81-FFE6-9ABD-FC4B813204AF |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Hadronotus hrdyae Veenakumari |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Hadronotus hrdyae Veenakumari sp. n.
http://www.zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A0819D05-B2D2-4E8B-A4DC-20A7B056FA9D
( Figures 10 (a–g), 26(i))
Female body length = 1.73–1.95 mm (n = 3); male body length = 1.43–1.72 mm (n = 12).
Colour. Head, mesosoma and metasoma black; coxae brown-black; remainder of legs brown-yellow; clypeus red-brown; mandible yellow-brown, with black-brown teeth; radicle, basal half of A1 yellow-brown, remainder of A1, A2–A6 black-brown, A7–A12 black.
Head. 1.1× as wide as high, 1.5× as high as long. IOS: 0.5× head width, 1.2× eye length. POL: LOL: OOL: 25.2: 13.8: 1.9. OOL: 0.4× MOD. Compound eye: ovate (L: W = 27.2: 20.4). Sculpture of orbital furrow: foveate. Inner orbits in frontal view: converging dorsally. Central keel on frons: present, extending 4/5 length of frontal depression. Malar sulcus: with rectangular rugose areas. Shape of frontal depression: ovoid. L: W of frontal depression: 33.6: 23.1. Width of frontal depression: 0.7× IOS. Sculpture of frontal depression: transversely carinate, area between carinae smooth; in ventral 4/5 polygonal cells with rugose sculpture present on either side of transverse carinae. Submedial carina of frontal depression: restricted to dorsal 2/5. AOD in dorsal view: 6× OOL. Sculpture of frons sans frontal depression: polygonal cells with rugose sculpture, setose. Sculpture of vertex: polygonal cells with rugose sculpture. Hyperoccipital carina: present. Sculpture of gena: polygonal cells.
Mesosoma. L: W of mesoscutum: 35.2: 53.1. Sculpture of mesoscutum: polygonal cells with rugose sculpture, setose. L: W of mesoscutellum: 19.3: 39.3. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: polygonal cells with rugose sculpture, densely setose laterad. Posterior mesoscutellar sulcus: foveate. Sculpture of metascutellum: anteriorly foveate, posteriorly smooth. Posterior margin of metascutellum: semicircular. Sculpture of metanotal trough: foveate. Lateral propodeal area: laterally wide and narrowing centrad. Sculpture of lateral propodeal area: with depressions. Posterior propodeal projection: not pointed. Pronotal cervical sulcus: with depressions. Sculpture of lateral pronotal area: dorsally coriaceous reticulate, medially transversely carinate and ventrally weakly rugose. Prespecular sulcus: transversely foveate. Sculpture of speculum: transversely carinate, interspersed with foveae, setose. Femoral depression: rugose sculpture. Episternal sulcus: foveate. Postacetabular sulcus: indicated as a furrow. Mesepimeral sulcus: foveate. Sculpture of posterior mesepimeral area: narrow and smooth. Mesopleural carina: indicated ventrally. Mesopleural pit: present. Metapleural sulcus: foveate with setae. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: concealed beneath dense setae. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: concealed beneath dense setae. Paracoxal sulcus: with irregular depressions. L: W of fore wing: 123.1: 50.8. Ratio of length of m: st: pm: 5.8: 9.2: 7.7. L: W of hind wing: 100.7: 24.2. Length of hind wing marginal cilia: 0.21× width of wing. Shape of submarginalis: weakly curved, distant from anterior margin of wing, and not dipping before reaching marginalis; stigmalis curving inwards.
Metasoma. L: W of metasoma: 71.2: 56.7, 1.3 × as long as wide. Anterior margin of T1: weakly concave. Basal foveae on T1: present. Sculpture of T1: longitudinally costate with inverted ‘V’ shaped costae between longitudinal costae. Sculpture of T2: entirely with depressions and with short longitudinal costae on anterior margin; basal foveae absent. Length of T2: 6.7× length of T3. Sculpture of T3–T4: anteriorly and posteriorly smooth and medially weakly areolate. Setation of metasoma: T1 and T2 densely setose laterally, sublateral T2 and posterior tergites, sparsely setose.
Male. Similar to female. Length of A1–A 12 in ratio of 34.0: 8.0: 9.3: 8.0: 8.6: 9.0: 6.7: 8.0: 8.0: 8.0: 8.0: 14.6, respectively.
Material examined
Holotype, female ( ICAR / NBAIR /P4865), INDIA: Karnataka, Shivamogga, UAHS, Naville, 13.973°N, 75.578°E, ca 610 m, YPT, in paddy ( Oryza sativa : Poaceae ) field, 9 January 2017. Paratypes: one female ( ICAR / NBAIR /P4866), Karnataka, Shivamogga, UAHS, Naville, 13.973°N, 75.578°E, ca 610 m, YPT, in paddy ( Oryza sativa : Poaceae ) field, 9 January 2017; one female ( ICAR / NBAIR /P4867), Rajasthan: Udaipur, Kotda Wakal river basin, 24.241°N, 73.105°E, ca 310 m, YPT, 22 September 2016; 11 males ( ICAR / NBAIR /P4868–P4878), Karnataka, Shivamogga, UAHS, Naville, 13.973°N, 75.578°E, ca 610 m, YPT, in paddy ( Oryza sativa : Poaceae ) field, 9 January 2017; one male ( ICAR / NBAIR /P4879), Karnataka, Shivamogga, UAHS, Naville, 13.973°N, 75.578°E, ca 610 m, YPT, in paddy ( Oryza sativa : Poaceae ) field, 17 January 2017.
Etymology
This species is named after Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, the trailblazing primatologist and theoretical biologist whose early studies on the reproductive strategies of langurs in Mount Abu, Western India, propelled her to study the pivotal role that the rearing of children by ‘mothers and others’ has played in shaping the evolution of our own species. The name is treated as a noun in the genitive case.
Diagnosis
Hadronotus hrdyae sp. n. is unique in having an incurved stigmalis on the fore wing.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.