Guimaraesiella (Dicrurobates) latitemporalis Gustafsson, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:081203D8-39FF-41C3-A79A-BB63F47AB3B1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332146 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/80062BAA-25A9-4246-8AB9-D6885DE09F66 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:80062BAA-25A9-4246-8AB9-D6885DE09F66 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Guimaraesiella (Dicrurobates) latitemporalis Gustafsson |
status |
new species |
Guimaraesiella (Dicrurobates) latitemporalis Gustafsson & Bush, new species
( Figs 22–28 View FIGURES 22–23 View FIGURES 24–28 )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:80062BAA-25A9-4246-8AB9-D6885DE09F66
Type host. Dicrurus hottentottus brevirostris (Cabanis, 1851) —hair-crested drongo.
Other host. Dicrurus hottentottus ssp. (Linnaeus, 1766)—hair-crested drongo.
Type locality. Ban Nong Wai , Na Phung, Dan Sai District, Loei Province, Thailand .
Diagnosis. Guimaraesiella (Dicrurobates) latitemporalis is morphologically closest to Guimaraesiella (Di.) carbonivora . To distinguish these two species, see above, under the Diagnosis of the latter species.
Description. Both sexes. Head shape and chaetotaxy as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–28 . Lateral margins of preantennal area slightly convex, frons broadly flattened, slightly concave medianly; marginal carina broad, irregular; dorsal preantennal suture reaches dsms and ads, but not lateral margins of head; ventral anterior plate broad, roughly trapezoidal; coni broad but short; temples rounded, much wider than preantennal head; gular plate broadly rhombic ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Thoracic and abdominal segments as in Figs 22–23 View FIGURES 22–23 .
Male. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–23 ; aps present on tergopleurites IV–VII. Genitalia as in Figs 25–27 View FIGURES 24–28 : basal apodeme rounded rectangular, with slight constriction at mid-length ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Proximal mesosome broad, trapezoidal; ventral sclerite broad anteriorly, narrowing distally, reaching anterior margin of mesosome; secondary plate with irregular anterior end; mesosomal lobes broad; rugose nodi prominent, connected medianly by wrinkled or rugose band anterior to gonopore; 2 ames sensilla on each side near antero-lateral corners of mesosomal lobes; 2 pmes sensilla on each side lateral to gonopore, near rugose nodi; gonopore broader than long, with slender marginal thickening widening somewhat distally ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Parameral heads irregularly triangular, and blades broad, tapering only distally ( Figs 25, 27 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Measurements: Ex Dicrurus hottentottus brevirostris (n = 17): TL = 1.40–1.64 (1.49); HL = 0.36–0.40 (0.38); HW = 0.33–0.38 (0.35); PRW = 0.19–0.23 (0.21); PTW = 0.29–0.35 (0.31); AW = 0.39–0.51 (0.43). Ex Dicrurus hottentottus (n = 8, except AW, where n = 7): TL = 1.36–1.59; HL = 0.37–0.40; HW = 0.33–0.37; PRW = 0.19–0.23; PTW = 0.30–0.35; AW = 0.42–0.50.
Female. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–23 ; psps present on tergopleurite VIII. Subgenital plate roughly trapezoidal, with irregular lateral margins; lateral submarginal bulges triangular, wide ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Vulval margin flattened medianly, with 3–6 short, slender vms on each side, and 5–9 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 4–6 short, slender vos on each side; distal 1–2 vos anterior to vss ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 24–28 ). Measurements: Ex Dicrurus hottentottus brevirostris (n = 21): TL = 1.57–1.94 (1.73); HL = 0.38–0.44 (0.40); HW = 0.36–0.42 (0.37); PRW = 0.21–0.25 (0.22); PTW = 0.32–0.36 (0.34); AW = 0.44–0.56 (0.48). Ex Dicrurus hottentottus (n = 8, except TL, where n = 7): TL = 1.58–2.00; HL = 0.38–0.44; HW = 0.35–0.42; PRW = 0.20–0.25; PTW = 0.33–0.39; AW = 0.49–0.59.
Etymology. The species epithet is formed by “ latus” Latin for “broad”, and “ tempus ” Latin for “temples”, referring to the wide postantennal area of this species.
Type material. Ex Dicrurus hottentottus brevirostris : Holotype ♂, Ban Nong Wai , Na Phung, Dan Sai District, Loei Province, Thailand, 16 Nov. 1954, R . E. Elbel, RE-4264, RT-B-21025 ( NHML). Paratypes: 1♂, 3♀, Jingxin County, Guanxi Province, China, 24 Sep. 2004, S.E. Bush, P-208, ATP-2004-78, PIPR#56–57 ( PIPR); 1♂, 2♀, same locality and collector, 26 Sep. 2004, P-267, ATP-2004-93, PIPR#58 ( PIPR); 1♂, 1♀, same locality and col-lector, 30 Sep. 2004, P-391, AN-447, PIPR#59 ( PIPR); 1♀, same locality and collector, 6 Oct. 2004, P-603, ATP-2004-179, PIPR#60 ( PIPR); 7♂, 7♀, same locality and collector, 7 Oct. 2004, P-604, ATP-2004-180, PIPR#61–65 ( PIPR); 1♀, same locality and collector, 8 Oct. 2004, P-629, GC-2004-40, PIPR#66 ( PIPR); 2♂, 2♀, same data, P-641, ATP-2004-193, PIPR#55 , 85 ( PIPR) .
Non-type material. Ex Dicrurus hottentottus : 2♂, 1♀, Phu Phan Mountains , Sakon Nakhon Province, Thai-land, 14 Jun. 1954, R. E. Elbel & B. Lekagul, RE-3696, B-30883 ( PIPR) ; 1♂, 3♀, same data ( NHML) ; 1♂, Khlong Khlung , Kamphaeng Phet Province, Thailand, 20 Apr. 1953, R. E. Elbel & H.G. Deignan, RE-2462, RT-B-21032 ( NHML) ; 2♂, 1♀, Wat Phai Lom , Thailand, 24 Nov. 1970, WE-813 ( NHML) ; 1♂, 1♀, Doi Pha Hom Pok , Chieng Mai Province, Thailand, 10 Oct. 1965, MAPS-2213 ( NHML) ; 1♂, 1♀, Pangla , Lampang Province, Thailand, 5 Feb. 1953, R. E. Elbel & H.G. Deignan, RE-2244, RT-B-17754 ( NHML) ; 1♂, 1♀, Pang Nam Un , Bun Yun, Nan Province, Thailand, 20 Jan. 1953, R. E. Elbel & H.G. Deignan, RE-2101, RT-B-17718 ( NHML) ; 1♂, 1♀, Ban Pha Hanh , Nan Province, Thailand, 30 Nov. 1961, Y-80 ( NHML) ; 1♀, Wat Phai Lom , Thailand, 10 Feb. 1970, XE-106, 050-37514 ( USNM) ; 1♂, D[ehra] Dun [ India?], L. Harrison Collection, BM 1934-570 ( NHML) .
Ex Dicrurus hottentottus brevirostris : 3♂, 3♀, Pang Nam Un , Bun Yun, Nan Province, Thailand, 20 Jan. 1953, R . E. Elbel & H.G. Deignan, RE-2101, RT-B-17718 ( BPBM); 1♂, 1♀, Pangla , Lampang Province, Thailand, 5 Feb. 1953, R . E. Elbel & H.G. Deignan, RE-2244, RT-B-17754 ( BPBM) .
Remarks. In the phylogeny of Bush et al. (2016), Guimaraesiella latitemporalis was represented by two specimens from the type host, as well as one specimen from Liocichla phoenicea (Gould, 1837) , but we have not examined any other Guimaraesiella from L. phoenicea . Although no data are available on whether the two host species occur in the same mixed-species foraging flocks, other species of Dicrurus and Liocichla are known to flock together ( Chen & Hsieh 2002), which may provide opportunities for lice to exchange hosts. We do not include L. phoenicea as a host of G. latitemporalis until more samples confirm that this host-louse association is natural and regular.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Guimaraesiella |