Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4069.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52FC658C-78C7-49FC-9961-8AC43CA03101 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5666968 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8E0E8F67-7D65-FFF0-ACBA-08B5FCB8D00A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, 1990 |
status |
|
Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, 1990 View in CoL
( Figs. 93–97 View FIGURE 93 View FIGURE 94 View FIGURE 95 View FIGURE 96 View FIGURE 97 , 134)
Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, in Hormiga & Döbel, 1990: 197 View in CoL , figs. 1–14 (male holotype from Tuckerton, Ocean Co., New Jersey, United States of America, 1.xi.1984, H. Döbel leg., deposited in USNM, examined; Paratypes from the same locality, 6♀ 6♂, 9.x.1984, 3♀ 4♂, 7.xi.1984, H. Döbel leg., deposited in USNM; 1♀ 1♂, 9.x.1984, H. Döbel leg., deposited in AMNH; 1♀ 1♂, 9.x.1984 H. Döbel leg., deposited in MCZ, all examined); Hormiga et al. 1995: 326, figs. 7H–I; Cabra-García et al. 2014: 1029, figs. 1K, 4D, 6 A, 8B; World Spider Catalog 2015.
Diagnosis. Males of G. heleios can be easily distinguished from all other Glenognatha species (except G. iviei ) by the presence of a small pointed basal apophysis on the paracymbium ( Figs. 95F View FIGURE 95 , 97H View FIGURE 97 ); distinguished from G. iviei by the slightly curved Prt 1 ( Fig. 94 A View FIGURE 94 ) and by the uncoiled embolus distal portion ( Figs. 95D View FIGURE 95 , 97E–G View FIGURE 97 ). Females resemble those of G. foxi and G. hirsutissima by having a basal constriction on the spermathecae ( Figs. 96D–E View FIGURE 96 ); distinguished from the former by the absence of CFO ( Figs. 94D–F View FIGURE 94 ) and from the latter by the absence of macrosetae on the ventral surface of femur III.
Description. Male and female described by Hormiga & Döbel (1990). Additional data. Habitus as in Figure 93 View FIGURE 93 . Femur III and IV without trichobothria. Male and female with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 ). Male chelicerae with anterior tooth and CFO ( Fig. 94 A –C View FIGURE 94 ). Palp as in Figures 95E–H View FIGURE 95 . Conductor retrolateral apophysis rounded ( Figs. 95B–C View FIGURE 95 ). Embolus curved prolaterally ( Figs. 97 A, E View FIGURE 97 ). Female tracheal system as in Figures 96F–H View FIGURE 96 . Spermathecae with a basal constriction ( Figs. 96D–E View FIGURE 96 ). UE entire ( Fig. 96 A –C View FIGURE 96 ).
Variation. See Hormiga & Döbel (1990).
Distribution. Known in New Jersey state in United States of America ( Fig. 134).
Additional material examined (N = 18). UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: New Jersey: Ocean Co., Tuckerton, [39º36´N, 74º20´W], elev. [1m], 7.xi.1984, H. Döbel leg., 4♂ 7♀ ( USNM) GoogleMaps ; 28.vii.1984, H. Döbel leg., 3♂ ( USNM) ; 25.ix.1984, H. Döbel leg., 2♂ ( USNM) .
New records. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: New Jersey: Oceanville , [39º28´N, 74º27´W], elev. [12m], 26.ix.1949, P. F. Springer leg., 1♀ 1♂ ( AMNH). GoogleMaps
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, 1990
Jimmy Cabra-García & Antonio D. Brescovit 2016 |
Glenognatha heleios Hormiga, in Hormiga & Döbel, 1990 : 197
Cabra-Garcia 2014: 1029 |
Hormiga 1995: 326 |
Hormiga 1990: 197 |