Lyonsifusus ansatus (Gmelin, 1791)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4585.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:882D13C5-D921-43B3-9847-4B3925EBB671 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5462135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F98781-FFAF-E44E-4093-0957FB9F0E9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lyonsifusus ansatus |
status |
|
The Lyonsifusus ansatus View in CoL species complex
In species complexes within several Fusinine genera, the morphologies of typical specimens diverge into several or many diverse forms. Given the present depauperate understanding of the biology of individual fusinine taxa, taxonomists have tended to regard these complexes simply as variable species. Examples include Fusinus colus ( Linnaeus, 1758) of the western Pacific, F. perplexus ( A. Adams, 1864) of Japanese seas, Africofusus ocellifer ( Lamarck, 1816) of South Africa and Marmorofusus nicobaricus ( Röding, 1798) of the Indo-west Pacific (see Snyder & Lyons 2014). Two examples in the western Atlantic include the group of Goniofusus strigatus ( Philippi, 1850) — G. brasiliensis ( Grabau, 1904) of central and southern Brazil and the Lyonsifusus ansatus complex of northern South America and the Lesser Antilles. The latter group contains several named taxa, of which we classify all except one as the variable L. ansatus ( Gmelin, 1791) (see below). The exception is Lyonsifusus carvalhoriosi ( Macsotay & Campos Villarroel, 2001) , which clearly is related to the L. ansatus group but whose shell morphology is sufficiently distinctive to merit recognition as a separate species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |