Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930310001618895 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DF2D33-AB47-FFB1-FE89-25CDFCBDE24E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931 |
status |
|
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931 View in CoL
( figures 1–9 View FIGS )
Forcipomyia (Apelma) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931: 169 View in CoL (male; Argentina).
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis: Wirth, 1974: 12 View in CoL (in catalogue to Neotropical species; subgeneric position); Spinelli and Wirth, 1993: 27 (in list of Argentinean species); Borkent and Wirth, 1997: 49 (in catalogue to world species); Borkent and Spinelli, 2000: 23 (in catalogue to Neotropical species).
Forcipomyia limnetis: Spinelli, 1998: 325 View in CoL (in list of Argentinean species).
Lasiohelea shannoni Ingram and Macfie, 1931: 171 View in CoL ( Lasiohelea View in CoL ; female; Argentina). New synonymy.
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) shannoni: Wirth, 1974: 12 View in CoL (in catalogue to Neotropical species; comb.); Spinelli and Wirth, 1993: 27 (in list of Argentinean species); Borkent and Wirth, 1997: 50 (in catalogue to World species); Borkent and Spinelli, 2000: 23 (in catalogue to Neotropical species).
Forcipomyia shannoni: Spinelli, 1998: 325 View in CoL (in list of Argentinean species).
Diagnosis
A medium-sized, brown species; flagellomeres 1–8 distinctly broader than long; third segment of maxillary palpi swollen, sensory pit deep opening by a small pore; CR 0.55; tarsal claws equal, small, bifid at extreme apex; female genital sclerotization open, subquadrangular; two pyriform spermathecae; aedeagus stout, basal arch extending to half of total length; parameres inverted U-shaped, lateral arms strongly divergent.
Female
Wing. Length 1.23 mm (1.08–1.34, N ~4); breadth 0.56 mm (0.50–0.60, N ~4).
Head. Dark brown. Vertex pilose. Eyes bare, contiguous by a distance equal to diameter of three ommatidia. Flagellum of antenna ( figure 1 View FIGS ) with flagellomeres 1–8 distinctly broader than long; 9–12 elongated, cylindrical, approximately 2.3 times longer than greatest breadth; distal flagellomere slightly longer than 9–12; AR 1.69 (1.54–1.82, N ~4). Palpus ( figure 2 View FIGS ) with third segment nearly as long as the combined length of fourth and fifth segments, with deep sensory pit opening by a small rounded pore; PR 1.91 (1.75–2.06, N ~4). Mandible ( figure 3 View FIGS ) abruptly tapering to pointed apex, armed with 10 very small teeth. Maxilla ( figure 4 View FIGS ) straight, tapering to pointed tip, with six pairs of minute teeth.
Thorax. Scutum dark brown, with narrow pale longitudinal admedian stripes, prescutellar area paler; scutellum pale brown, with approximately 20 strong setae and 15 slender ones. Legs brown, densely covered by hairs; prothoracic TR 2.02 (1.93–2.07, N ~4), mesothoracic TR 1.98 (1.93–2.00, N ~4), metathoracic TR 2.02 (1.92–2.12, N ~4). Claws ( figure 5 View FIGS ) short, stout and curved, bifid at extreme apex; empodium well developed. Wing ( figure 6 View FIGS ) densely covered with dark macrotrichia, more abundant on anterior margin; a small pale area situated immediately distad to the second radial cell; first radial cell almost obliterated, second radial cell well developed; CR 0.55 (0.52–0.57, N ~4). Halter whitish.
Abdomen. Pale brown. Genital sclerotization ( figure 7 View FIGS ) open, subquadrangular. Two well-sclerotized, pyriform spermathecae ( figure 8 View FIGS ), subequal, measuring 0.056× 0.046 mm and 0.050× 0.042 mm, necks 0.004 mm.
Male
Similar to female with the usual sexual differences. Hind tarsal ratio 1.70.
Genitalia. Sternite 9 aproximately half as long as broad, with broad caudomedian excavation; tergite 9 short, with conspicuous, hairy apicolateral processes; sternite 10 spiculate anteriorly. Gonocoxite narrow, three times longer than broad; gonostylus nearly straight, slender, as long as gonocoxite. Aedeagus ( figure 9 View FIGS ) triangular, stout with rounded blunt tip; basal arms slender, strongly sclerotized; basal arch extending to half of total length; distal portion lightly sclerotized. Parameres highly sclerotized, inverted U-shaped, lateral arms strongly divergent.
Distribution
In subantarctic forest of northern Patagonia (Neuquen and Río Negro provinces in Argentina, Osorno in Chile) ( figure 24 View FIG ).
Types
Holotype „ of Forcipomyia limnetis (slide in Canada balsam), holotype ” of Lasiohelea shannoni (pinned), Argentina, Río Negro Prov., Lake Correntoso , 18–25 November 1926, F. and M. Edwards. In the Natural History Museum, London (both examined during the present study).
Other specimens examined
Argentina, Río Negro Prov., Lake Correntoso , 1”, 18–25 November 1926, F. and M. Edwards (paratype of L. shannoni , slide in Canada balsam in the Natural History Museum, London) ; Neuquen Prov. Stream Pedregoso and provincial route No. 67 (5 km W of El Portezuelo), 3 February 1986, G. Spinelli, 1”; Río Negro Prov., ‘Nahuel Huapi’ National Park, Stream Chall-Huaco, 26 January 1988, G. Spinelli, 1”; ‘ Nahuel Huapi’ National Park, Lake Guillelmo , 24 February 1994, G. Spinelli, 1 ”. Chile, Osorno, Pucatrihue , 1 December 1992, G. Spinelli, 1” .
Discussion
The study of the types of Lasiohelea shannoni (female) and Forcipomyia limnetis (male), both with identical collecting data, reveals that their differences obey two usual sexual differences within species of the subgenus Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) , representing thus, the two sexes of a single species.
The original description and illustrations of F. limnetis are very accurate except for the aedeagus, which shows lower basal arch and broader apex. Ingram and Macfie (1931) report a metathoracic TR ‘about 2.4’ for L. shannoni . Perhaps they measured this feature from the slide-mounted paratype, which shows the second
tarsomere of the hind leg somewhat folded, being the measure most probably overestimated. On the other hand, the pinned holotype is in excellent condition, and shows a metathoracic TR only slightly longer than 2.00.
Females of this species are barely distinguishable from those of F. (T.) tehuelche sp. n. The males, however, differ by the following genital characters: caudomedian excavation of sternite 9 broad (narrow in tehuelche ), aedeagus with basal arch extending to one-half of total length and without distal process (extending to onetenth of total length, with a distinctive distal process in tehuelche ), and lateral arms of parameres strongly divergent (subparallel in tehuelche ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis Ingram and Macfie, 1931
Marino, Pablo I. & Spinelli, Gustavo R. 2004 |
Forcipomyia limnetis:
SPINELLI, G. R. 1998: 325 |
Forcipomyia shannoni:
SPINELLI, G. R. 1998: 325 |
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) limnetis:
BORKENT, A. & SPINELLI, G. R. 2000: 23 |
BORKENT, A. & WIRTH, W. W. 1997: 49 |
SPINELLI, G. R. & WIRTH, W. W. 1993: 27 |
WIRTH, W. W. 1974: 12 |
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) shannoni:
BORKENT, A. & SPINELLI, G. R. 2000: 23 |
BORKENT, A. & WIRTH, W. W. 1997: 50 |
SPINELLI, G. R. & WIRTH, W. W. 1993: 27 |
WIRTH, W. W. 1974: 12 |
Forcipomyia (Apelma) limnetis
INGRAM, A. & MACFIE, J. W. S. 1931: 169 |
Lasiohelea shannoni
INGRAM, A. & MACFIE, J. W. S. 1931: 171 |