Flabelligera haswelli

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2012, Revision of Flabelligera Sars, 1829 (Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae) 3203, Zootaxa 3203 (1), pp. 1-64 : 18-20

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3203.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8C476837-FFF4-FFF2-FF79-FAAFFC30FB83

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Flabelligera haswelli
status

 

Flabelligera haswelli View in CoL new name

Figure 5 View FIGURE 5

Siphonostoma affine Haswell 1886:750–752 View in CoL , Pl. 54, Figs. 1–5 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 ; Haswell 1892:329, footnote, Pl. 27, Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 , Pl. 28, Fig. 26.

Type material. Southeastern Australia. Neotype ( AM-8674 ), Halifax Park, Port Stephens (32°45'00" S, 151°49'59" E), New South Wales, 8 m, under rock, 6 Dec. 1978, N. Coleman coll. GoogleMaps

Additional material. Southeastern Australia. One specimen ( AM-4315 ), Bottle + Glass rocks, Vaucluse Pt., near Sydney , New South Wales, low tide, in sand under rocks, 23 Oct. 1968, H. Paxton coll. (tunic partially and almost all neurochaetae removed) . One specimen ( AM-4549 ), Newport, New South Wales, on coast (no further data) (tunic partially removed, most neurochaetae undamaged). One anterior fragment ( AM-25955 ), Split Solitary Island , New South Wales, 16 m, among algae, sponge and tunicates, 7 Mar. 1992, P. Hutchings coll.

Description. Neotype (AM-8674) damaged. Body oval, cylindrical, posteriorly tapered, broken into two pieces ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ), 35 mm long, 3 mm wide (10 mm wide including broken tunic), cephalic cage 3.5 mm long, 48 chaetigers). Tunic thick, without sediment particles, damaged dorsally; papillae dark.

Cephalic hood not exposed ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Prostomium low cone; four large eyes, anterior ones slightly larger. Caruncle projected dorsally, separating the lateral branchial groups. Palps larger than branchiae, contracted; palp bases prominent, triangular.

Branchial filaments separated into two lateral groups, each with about 30 filaments, varying in size, but longest filaments shorter than palps. Lateral lips thick, muscular; dorsal and ventral lips reduced. Nephridial lobes damaged by dissection.

Cephalic cage chaetae one-tenth as long as body, slightly longer than body width. Chaetiger 1 involved in cephalic cage, about 40 chaetae per rami. Anterior dorsal margin of chaetiger 1 smooth, slightly depressed (some specimens with a transverse band of pigmented spots AM-25955). Anterior chaetigers without long papillae. Chaetigers become longer after the first but after chaetiger 4, reduced in length. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage to body chaetae abrupt; neurochaetal type change in chaetiger 2 ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). Gonopodial lobes not seen ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ).

Parapodia well developed. Notopodia and neuropodia projecting cones with long papillae covering the chaetae. Notopodia lateral, neuropodia ventrolateral.

Median notochaetae arranged in short transverse rows (as in a fan); all multiarticulated capillaries, smooth, about as long as body width, 7–9 per bundle, with regular, poorly defined articulations. Neurochaetae multiarticulate capillaries in chaetiger 1; other neuropodia with mostly single hooks from chaetiger 2, some neuropodia with two hooks. Multiarticulated neurohooks with crest entire, reddish ( Fig. 5E, F View FIGURE 5 ). Handle articulation basally placed, articles roughly of the same length; 3–4 articles, medium-sized and long. Other articles anchylosed, small, continued to the bending region. Crest slightly wider than handle, dark brown along the body, with darker distal half; width:length ratio 1:4–5.

Posterior end tapered; pygidium truncate, conical, anus terminal, without anal cirri.

Etymology. The species is named for the late Dr. William A. Haswell, who made several studies on Australian polychaetes, two of which dealt with flabelligerid polychaetes.

Remarks. Flabelligera haswelli n. n. resembles F. salazarae n. sp. (see below); they differ in the relative tunic thickness or resistance and in the type of neurohooks. In F. haswelli , the tunic is thick and resistant, and the neurohooks are shorter and thicker with wider crests, whereas F. salazarae n. sp. has a thin, delicate tunic, with neurohooks that are longer and thinner with tapering crests.

Haswell (1886) overlooked the description by Sars (1829) but he regarded his species as closely allied to S. diplochaitus ( Otto, 1821) , which belongs in Flabelligera . Thus, the new combination F. affine ( Haswell, 1886) becomes a junior, secondary homonym of F. affinis Sars, 1829 ( ICZN 1999, Art. 57.3); the difference in declension is not enough to retain both names since they are derived from the same adjective ( ICZN 1999, Art. 57.6). The junior homonym name must be replaced ( ICZN 1999, Art. 60) as has been done above. Haswell studied a living subtidal specimen and stated that it was light red and crimson posteriorly, which cannot be confirmed because color fades in alcohol. The eye arrangement that he illustrated could be explained as a pigmented area including the four eyes, whereas the smaller ones could be accessory eyes, which have been found in other flabelligerids. There are no types deposited in the Macleay Museum, University of Sydney (S. Norrington, e-mail, 15 Sept. 2003), nor in the Australian Museum; therefore, a neotype has been proposed.

Neotype locality: Port Stephens , New South Wales, Australia ( ICZN 1999, Art. 76.3).

Distribution. Originally described from Port Jackson, Australia. The present specimens come from several localities in Southeastern Australia, close to the type locality. The Southeastern Australian records of F. affinis Sars must be regarded as questionable although they might represent F. haswelli .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Terebellida

Family

Flabelligeridae

Genus

Flabelligera

Loc

Flabelligera haswelli

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2012
2012
Loc

Siphonostoma affine

Haswell, W. A. 1892: 329
Haswell, W. A. 1886: 752
1886
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF