Fissidens pocsii Bizot & Dury ex Pócs
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2022v43a2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB87C7-FF84-FFA7-51D6-FB5DDB38FD0B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fissidens pocsii Bizot & Dury ex Pócs |
status |
sensu lato |
Fissidens pocsii Bizot & Dury ex Pócs View in CoL sensu lato
( Fig. 14)
Fissidens pocsii sensu lato is characterized by mammillose laminal cells, vaginant laminae with revolute margins, limbidia present on some or all leaves of perichaetial stems, leaves of vegetative stems limbate or not, antheridia in axillary buds as well as terminal, setae short, papillose. It is a rather heterogeneous species. It appeared, however, impossible to find differentiating features for its expressions. Differences in leaf shape, length of the costa, in anatomy of the stem, peristomes divided or undivided, growing on twigs or on bark of trees or large branches and geographical distribution appeared to be weakly or not correlated. Cross-sections of stems in this complex vary from round to elliptical, central strand present or not and walls of inner cells strongly incrassate ( Fig. 14C) or thin. Corticolous on trees and twigs (Malagasy species on twigs).
DISTRIBUTION. — Tanzania, La Réunion and Madagascar.
Peristome
The peristome of this species is too variable to allow a description that is comparable to the other descriptions and does do justice to its variability. In Figure 14 a divided and an undivided peristome are shown. Peristomes of this species have “spiral” filaments. The peristome can be divided or not and the ornamentation of the basal OPL is variable. On the IPL the “spiral” ornamentation is not limited to the filaments but, like in Fissidens papillisetus , continues almost to the insertion (this feature, however, could not be checked in all specimens because of the poor quality of some peristomes). When undivided the peristome resembles that of F. papillisetus from which it differs by the OPL lamellae of the basal part: in F. papillisetus the lamellae are close packed ( Fig. 13B, C View FIG ) and in F. pocsii not ( Fig. 14A, D). For further differences see F. papillisetus . When divided the peristome resembles that of F. inclusus . In F. inclusus , however, the IPL lamellae of the undivided part are smooth or have an inconspicuous ornamentation ( Fig. 9C View FIG ) whereas in F. pocsii there is a prominent ornamentation similar to that of the of the filaments ( Fig. 14E). Furthermore, F. inclusus has shorter setae and limbidia that are restricted to the vaginant laminae of the upper perichaetial leaves.
Illustration and description
Bruggeman-Nannenga & Arts (2010: fig. 28).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.