Ficus oerstediana (Miq.) Miq., Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.361.2.9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D4387D5-FF80-DB3A-C7DD-F955FBA0FDB6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ficus oerstediana (Miq.) Miq., Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi |
status |
|
Ficus oerstediana (Miq.) Miq., Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi View in CoL 3: 299. 1867
≡ Urostigma oerstedianum Miq., Bot. Voy. Herald [Seemann] 5: 196, t. 36. 1854.
Lectotype (designated here):— PANAMA. Chiriquí, Chiriquí Volcano, Seemann 1158 ( BM!).
Nomenclatural notes:— The protologue does not state the herbarium where the type of F. oerstediana was deposited. Hemsley (1883) cited the specimen Seemann 1158 (K) as the type; however, this collection has not been found again. Berg (2007b) cited Seemann 1158 (BM) as the holotype; however, this cannot be considered a lectotypification because it was published after 2001 and the “designated here” or a similar phrase was not used ( Turland et al. 2018, Art. 7.11). Here, we designate Seemann 1158 (BM) as the lectotype because it is the only known collection.
Taxonomical notes:— The currently accepted name for this taxon is Ficus americana subsp. americana .
Ficus prinoides Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL , ed. 4 [Willdenow] 4(2): 1149. 1806, non Cham. & Schltdl., Linnaea 6: 357. 1831
≡ Urostigma prinoides Miq., London J. Bot. View in CoL 6: 540. 1847.
Lectotype (first step, designated by Dugand 1943; second step, designated here): — COLOMBIA. Tolima, Honda , June 1801, Humboldt 1696 (P-756633!; isolectotype: P-669791!).
Nomenclatural notes:— The protologue does not state the herbarium where the type of F. prinoides was deposited. Dugand (1943) was the first one to suggest the specimen was at Paris (P); however, there are two preparations of the same collection in this herbarium. It is not clearly indicated in their labels whether they are part of a single specimen, and thus these are considered to be two duplicates ( Turland et al. 2018, Art. 8.3). Here, we chose Humboldt 1696 (P-756633) as lectotype because it is a more complete specimen with branches, leaves, stipules, peduncles, and syconia.
Taxonomical notes:— The currently accepted name for this taxon is Ficus pallida .
BM |
Bristol Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ficus oerstediana (Miq.) Miq., Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi
Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso, Romaniuc-Neto, Sergio & Mansano, Vidal De Freitas 2018 |
Ficus prinoides Humb. & Bonpl. ex
Willd., Sp. Pl. 1831: 357 |