Eremophlepsius rohdendorfi Zachvatkin, 1924

Tishechkin, Dmitri Yu., 2023, Contributions to the study of the subtribe Eremophlepsiina Dmitriev, 2002 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Opsiini), Zootaxa 5270 (3), pp. 573-583 : 574

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5270.3.8

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F05A4310-0B0B-46A5-8EC0-72FEC9F52410

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7863581

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/021487A0-D45B-753A-4FAC-DE85FB78F88B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Eremophlepsius rohdendorfi Zachvatkin, 1924
status

 

Eremophlepsius rohdendorfi Zachvatkin, 1924 View in CoL

( Figs. 1–3 View FIGURES 1–17 , 18–22, 35–36 View FIGURES 18–39 )

Material examined. The type series deposited in the ZMMU was studied. It includes male holotype ( Figs. 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–17 ), four male paratypes ( Figs. 18–19, 35–36 View FIGURES 18–39 ), and one female paratype with dark pattern labeled as E. rohdendorfi ab. marmorata ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–17 ) from Repetek village , Kara-Kum Desert, Turkmenistan, at light at 11. VI. 1923 and two female paratypes without dark pattern from Ush-Adzhi, 65 km SW of Repetek, Kara-Kum Desert, Turkmenistan, at light at 6. V and 9. VI. 1923 collected by B. Rohdendorf and E. Smirnov. In the original description, for one female from Ush-Adzhi the collection date 15. V. 1923 instead of 6. V. 1923 is given ( Zachvatkin, 1924).

According to the original description, the type series includes not five, but seven males from Repetek. Dlabola (1963) gives drawings of the male paratype from Haupt’s collection ( Figs. 21–22 View FIGURES 18–39 ); this suggests that two males, which are absent in the ZMMU, were given by Zachvatkin to other specialists.

Description. Typically, yellowish white with indistinct traces of dark pattern on head, pro-, and mesonotum and light brown veins on forewings ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–17 ). One female has two black spots on fore margin of head, four dark longitudinal stripes in fore part of body, and brown veins and darkened apices of forewings ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–17 ).

Aedeagus divided into two wide stems from very base; dorsally to each stem there is hook-like basal process ( Figs. 18–19 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Stem apices wide, comb-shaped, with teeth bent outward on inner edges ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Subgenital plates short, without macrosetae, only with thin hair-like setae; valve very large ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 18–39 ). Styles stout, truncated at apices, bent outward in distal parts. Pygofer lobes widely rounded, with pointed, almost straight ventral processes, directed slightly dorsally ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 18–39 ).

Body length: ♁, 5.1–5.5 mm; ♀, 6.0– 6.1 mm.

Distribution. Turkmenistan, Kara-Kum desert.

Remarks. In Metcalf (1967) and McKamey (2000), E. rohdendorfi var. marmorata Zachvatkin, 1924 is listed as a subspecies. In fact, both on the label under the specimen and in his article, Zachvatkin uses the abbreviation “ab.” (“aberration”); therefore, in accordance with Article 45.6.2 of ICZN, this name should be considered infrasubspecific. Moreover, the female with brown pattern ( E. rohdendorfi ab. marmorata) was collected in the same locality on the same date as the holotype and male paratypes and thus, is not a subspecies, but an infrasubspecific entity. For this reason, this name must be excluded from the species group (ICZN, Article 45.5).

As already mentioned above, the aedeagus of members of this subtribe has a complex shape, so its appearance strongly depends on the angle from which it is viewed. This can be seen in the example of this species; even drawings of the aedeagus of males from the same series are difficult to compare ( Figs. 18–22 View FIGURES 18–39 ).

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF