Ephydatia chileana Pisera and Sáez, 2003

Pronzato, Roberto, Pisera, Andrzej & Manconi, Renata, 2017, Fossil freshwater sponges: Taxonomy, geographic distribution, and critical review, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3), pp. 467-495 : 486-487

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00354.2017

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A93569-FFCA-B661-FCDA-F8C44F73F770

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Ephydatia chileana Pisera and Sáez, 2003
status

 

Ephydatia chileana Pisera and Sáez, 2003 View in CoL

Fig. 20 View Fig .

Type horizon: Late Miocene.

A 100 μm B 20 μm C

20 μm D 10 μm E 200 μm

Type locality: Quillagua Formation , Atacama region, Chile. References: Pisera and Sáez 2003 .

Description (emended from Pisera and Sáez 2003).—Three intact gemmules and many loose megascleres and gemmuloscleres preserved in a diatomite. No entire sponge bodies. Megascleres slightly curved, smooth oxeas (240–350 × 8–15 μm). Gemmules spherical to flattened (237–250 μm in diameter). Gemmuloscleres birotules (39–45 μm in length), with spiny shaft (5.5–7.2 μm in thickness) armed by a variable number (4–11) of strong, long conical spines of variable length. Rotules (usually 24.8–27.0 μm in diameter) with irregular margins, often deeply incised, and the resulting teeth (16 to 20–21 spines) not in the same plane vary greatly in length (ca. 11.0 μm at the longest); rotules upper surface, clear, flat, with a button-like central convexity (umbonate rotule). In one gemmule, many aberrant rotules bear a swelling in the middle of the shaft, along with rotules of normal morphology. Spines reduced to small tubercles on a bulbous-like termination of rotules and/or less numerous and irregularly developed.

Remarks.—The investigated material resembles the Recent cosmopolitan species Ephydatia fluviatilis but differs from it in having smaller diameters of gemmules, longer and thicker shafts of the gemmuloscleres, and larger diameter of rotules. E. chileana also has many long, conical spines on the gemmuloscleres’ shaft. The upper surface of the rotule is smooth in the investigated material, whereas in E. fluviatilis , it is often spiny to various degrees. Megascleres are of very similar size and smooth in E. chileana , whereas they are often microspinose in E. fluviatilis .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF