Ennea elliptica var. manca Burnup, 1914
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.61.58085 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:76485E37-D7B9-481C-8EFA-73CA9B88DEF0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/25833777-A875-5A44-B337-5434E3AED2A4 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ennea elliptica var. manca Burnup, 1914 |
status |
|
Ennea elliptica var. manca Burnup, 1914 Fig. 1F View Figure 1
Ennea elliptica var. manca Burnup, 1914: 39, pl. 3, figs 13, 14.
Type locality.
"Fort Nottingham; also Curry’s Post, Natal (A. J. Taynton)" ( Burnup 1914: 39).
Material.
NMNZ M.207151 (1 shell, Nottingham Road, ex H. Suter colln 5704).
Current taxonomic status.
Synonymous with Gulella elliptica elliptica (Melvill & Ponsonby, 1898) ( van Bruggen 1980: 20).
Discussion.
The locality of the present specimen (Nottingham Road) is not a perfect match to the type locality given by Burnup (1914), although it is definitely in the same area. Burnup (1914) recorded Fort Nottingham as a different locality than Nottingham Road (see entry for G. melvilli below). As such, the present specimen is not considered type material. The types can be found in the NHM collection: holotype (NHMUK 1914.12.19.10, Fort Nottingham, presented by Burnup) and two paratypes (NHMUK 1914.12.19.23-24 Fort Nottingham, presented by Burnup), all housed in a single lot. A further specimen in the NHM (NHMUK 1937.12.30.801, ex. Connolly collection), despite being noted as a paratype (though original label reads ‘co-type’), is not in fact a type, as it was collected in Karkloof, which is not part of the type locality ( Burnup 1914).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ennea elliptica var. manca Burnup, 1914
Salvador, Rodrigo B. & Ablett, Jonathan D. 2020 |
Ennea elliptica var. manca
Burnup 1914 |