Eleodes (Steneleodes) hepburni Champion, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-69.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52ED5896-72C3-4D1F-B12D-E7A02FDB7346 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C187D0-FFBB-FFE8-FF5B-39E3E84AFDD9 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Eleodes (Steneleodes) hepburni Champion, 1892 |
status |
|
Eleodes (Steneleodes) hepburni Champion, 1892 , new placement
Eleodes compressitarsis Blaisdell, 1935
Eleodes beameri Blaisdell, 1937
Eleodes bryanti Blaisdell, 1937
Eleodes palmerleensis Blaisdell, 1937
Eleodes hepburni is the valid name for a group of synonymized species names with a tangled nomenclatural legacy. Blaisdell (1937) described the subgenus Holeleodes Blaisdell as containing three then newly described species from Arizona, therein named E. beameri Blaisdell (the type species), E. bryanti Blaisdell , and E. palmerleensis Blaisdell. These three purported species were later found to be conspecific with each other and were thus synonymized, remaining assigned to the subgenus Holeleodes (Triplehorn and Doyen 1972) . Triplehorn (2010) further synonymized these three species names with two priority-carrying names, i.e., E. compressitarsis Blaisdell and E. hepburni , which had both been placed by Papp (1961) in the subgenus Ardeleodes Blaisdell.
In his act of assigning synonymy, Triplehorn (2010) erroneously placed E. hepburni in the subgenus Promus . However, throughout his discussion, Triplehorn referenced the similarity of this assemblage to Eleodes longicollis LeConte, 1851 , which has consistently been placed in the subgenus Steneleodes . It is thus apparent that Triplehorn (2010) intended to place E. hepburni in Steneleodes and not Promus . This interpretation is further and unambiguously supported by the presence of heavily sclerotized female genitalia characteristic of the subgenus Steneleodes and phylogenetic placement based on molecular data (A. D. Smith and M. A. Johnston, unpublished data). Eleodes hepburni is hereby placed in the subgenus Steneleodes .
Although Triplehorn (2010) did not make any mention of the subgenus Holeleodes , it is in accordance with current species-level synonymies that this subgenus follows the placement of E. hepburni and thereby becomes a junior subjective synonym of Steneleodes .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eleodes (Steneleodes) hepburni Champion, 1892
Johnston, M. Andrew 2015 |
Eleodes beameri
Blaisdell 1937 |
Eleodes bryanti
Blaisdell 1937 |
Eleodes palmerleensis Blaisdell, 1937
Blaisdell. These 1937 |
Holeleodes
Blaisdell 1937 |
E. beameri
Blaisdell 1937 |
E. bryanti
Blaisdell 1937 |
E. palmerleensis
Blaisdell. These 1937 |
E. compressitarsis
Blaisdell 1935 |
Steneleodes
Blaisdell 1909 |
Steneleodes
Blaisdell 1909 |
Steneleodes
Blaisdell 1909 |
Steneleodes
Blaisdell 1909 |
Eleodes hepburni
Champion 1892 |
E. hepburni
Champion 1892 |
E. hepburni
Champion 1892 |
E. hepburni
Champion 1892 |
Eleodes hepburni
Champion 1892 |
Promus
Leconte 1862 |
Promus
Leconte 1862 |
Eleodes longicollis
LeConte 1851 |