Ecuadattus typicus, Zhang, Jun-Xia & Maddison, Wayne P., 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.209883 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6165750 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C7330F76-A31B-FFFE-FF7E-FCB52455F897 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ecuadattus typicus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ecuadattus typicus View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 45–52 View FIGURES 45 – 52 , 136–141 View FIGURES 136 – 141
Type material. Holotype: male, ECUADOR: Napo: Vinillos, near Cosanga, 0.6025° S, 77.8508° W, elev. 2080 m, 29–30 October 2010, coll. W. Maddison, D. Maddison, M. Vega & M. Reyes, WPM#10–036 (UBC-SEM AR00146, QCAZ). Paratypes: 1 female, same data as holotype (UBC-SEM AR00147); 6 males and 4 females, same data as holotype; 3 males, ECUADOR: Napo: Reserva Ecologica Antisana, Sendero Jumandy, 0.624– 0.625 ° S, 77.840– 77.842 ° W, elev. 2260 m, 29 October 2010, coll. W. Maddison, D. Maddison & M. Reyes, WPM#10–035; 1 male, ECUADOR: Napo: Cosanga, Yanayacu Biological Station, forest, 0.600– 0.601° S, 77.888– 77.890 ° W, elev. 2100 m, 7 November 2010, coll. W. Maddison, D. Maddison, M. Vega & M. Reyes, WPM#10–058.
Etymology. Latin typicus (typical), indicating that this is the type species of the genus.
Diagnosis. Differs from Ecuadattus napoensis by the long palpal tibia, the distinct tegular lobe and the absence of a ventral ridge on the palpal tibia ( Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ). This species can be distinguished from E. pichincha by the narrower palpal bulb, the longer palpal tibia, the absence of a ventral ridge on the palpal tibia ( Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ), and the narrower median septum of the epigynum ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ).
Description. Male (holotype, UBC-SEM AR00146). Carapace length 2.5 (variation 1.9–2.8, n=11); abdomen length 2.8. Chelicera ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): dark red brown; promargin with one bicuspid tooth and retromargin with one tooth. Palp ( Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): dark yellow brown. Palpal bulb narrow; tegular lobe distinct; embolic disc obvious; embolus slightly curved; retrolateral tibial apophysis long and finger-like. Measurements of legs: I 6.4, II 4.8, III 5.5, IV 5.9. Color in alcohol ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): carapace dark brown, eye area with guanine deposit, behind eye area with a longitudinal yellowish stripe; abdomen brown, with numerous light yellow speckles and a longitudinal stripe; first leg dark brown, other legs pale yellow to brown. Some male specimens with yellowish margins on dorsal abdomen.
Female (paratype, UBC-SEM AR00147). Carapace length 2.0 (variation 2.0–2.3, n=5); abdomen length 2.0. Chelicera ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Measurements of legs: I 3.8, II 3.4, III 4.3, IV 4.7. Epigynum ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): median septum wide, with opening to the copulatory duct anteriorly. Vulva ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): copulatory duct not coiled; spermatheca round. Color in alcohol ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45 – 52 ): paler than that of male, and markings on dorsal abdomen more obvious, first leg light yellow. Some female specimens as dark in color as that of holotype male.
Natural history. Specimens were found beating vegetation in cloud forest.
QCAZ |
Museo de Zoologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |