Dicerogastra euxoides, Ronkay & Gyulai & Ronkay, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.63.1.17.2017 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD9170-FB60-FFCD-C69C-2E16EADCFD9A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dicerogastra euxoides |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dicerogastra euxoides sP. n.
( Figs 7–10 View Figs 1–8 View Figs 9–14 , 19–22 View Figs 15–20 View Figs 21–24 , 27–28 View Figs 25–29 )
HolotyPe, male ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 1–8 ), China, NorthYunnan , DiqingTibetanAutonomousPrefecture, 5 kmSofDeqin, 3356 m, 19.VI.2009, leg. B. Benedek, slideNo. GYP 2333m (coll. PGY).
ParatyPes. China. 2 males, withthesamedataastheholotyPe; (coll. PGY) ; 1 male, fromthesamelocalityastheholotyPe, 16-17.VI.2009 (coll. G. Ronkay); 1 male, NorthYun- nan, DiqingTibetanAutonomousPrefecture, 8 kmNNEShangriLaatNairivillage, 3300 m, 14.VI.2009, leg. B. Benedek (coll. PGY) ; 1 female, Sichuan, 100 kmWofManiganggo, 3400 m, 26.VI.2004, leg. S. Nykl, slideNo. GYP1894 f (coll. PGY) ; 2 males, 4 females, Yunnan, Deqin , 3400 m, N28°30’, E98°55’, 30.V.-3.VI.2011, leg. J. Klir, slide No. GYP 3952m (coll. M. Dvořák) ; 2 males, fromthesamelocality, slideNosRL 11273m, RL 11274m (coll. L. Srnka) .
Diagnosis – WingsPan 32–34 mm, lengthofforewing 14–16 mm. Vesti- tureoftheheadandbody, groundcolourofwingsvariousshadesofbrown, costalmarginandaPicalPatchsomewhatlighter, antemedialandPostmedial crosslineswhitish, subterminallinePalewhitish-ochreous; orbicularstigma tiny, circular, reniformstigmaelliPtical, bothstigmatabrown, latterincom- Pletelywhitishencircled; claviformstigmadarkbrown.
ThenewsPecies ( Figs 7–10 View Figs 1–8 View Figs 9–14 ) differsfromtheeXternallymostsimilar D. ferrisparsa ( Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–8 ) byitsPalergroundcolour, Particularlyinthefemales, moredistinctlymarkedandsomewhatdifferentlyshaPedantemedialand Postmedialcrosslines, moresinuousandlessdistinctlymarkedsubterminal line, andthesomewhatdarkerhindwinginnerareawithstrongermarked, lunulatediscalsPot.
Dicerogastraeuxoides iseasierdistinguishedfromtheotherHimalayan sPecies, D. costigerodes ( Figs 3–6 View Figs 1–8 ) byitssmallersize (wingsPan 32–34 mmand 37–39 mm, resPectively), muchlessProminentforewingcostalstriPeand whitishdefinedantemedialandPostmedialcrosslines, themoresinuousand lesssharPlymarkedsubterminallineand, lastbutnotleast, bythealmost unicolorousbrownhindwingwithwell- visibledarkcellularlunule. Thedifferentialdiagnosisof D. euxoides and D. jensergabori isgivenundertheDiagnosisofthelattersPecies.
Malegenitalia ( Figs 19–22 View Figs 15–20 View Figs 21–24 ) – ComParingthemaleclasPingaPParatuses ofthethreecloselyrelatedsPecies, D. euxoides hasthesmallestcucullus, largestandmostventro- aPicallyProjectedamPulla, andthelongestsPinesatbase ofharPe. Additionally, thevesicaof D. euxoides isarmedbyveryshort, ter- minallyPositionedcornutifieldwhereasitismuchlongerintheothertwo sPeciesandneverlocatedatthePosteriorendofthevesica.
(Walker, 1857), holotyPe, BMNoct. 15787m, 23 = clasPingaPParatus; 24 = aedeagus
Femalegenitalia ( Figs 27–28 View Figs 25–29 ) – Thefemalegenitaliaof D. euxoides differ fromthoseof D. jensergabori bythelackofsclerotisationfromthedistalPartof aPPendiXbursaeandthesomewhatshorter, mediallymoresclerotisedductus bursae; thedifferencesbetween D. euxoides andthetwosouthernHimalayan sPeciesarediscussedindetailundertheDiagnosisof D. costigerodes .
Distribution – ThenewsPeciesisknownfromthesouth-easternborders oftheTibetanPlateauinChina, fromYunnanandSichuan. Thisdistribution PatternhelPsthecorrectidentification, sincenosymPatricoccurrencewith thesouthernHimalayansPecieshithertodescribedisknown.
Etymology – ThesPecificnamereferstothesuPerficialsimilarityofthemalegeni- taliawiththoseofthe Euxoa Hübner, 1821 sPecies. TheverylongsPine- bundleandthe longPenicularhair- tuftresemblesinamacroscoPicviewthetwocharacteristicsclerotised Processes (amPullaandsacculareXtension) ofan Euxoa clasPingaPParatus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.