Dendrolirium lasiopetalum (Willd.) S.C.Chen & J.J.Wood
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.481.1.1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887B7-8155-FFF9-FF04-FD5EFC3AF892 |
|
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
|
scientific name |
Dendrolirium lasiopetalum (Willd.) S.C.Chen & J.J.Wood |
| status |
|
Dendrolirium lasiopetalum (Willd.) S.C.Chen & J.J.Wood View in CoL in Fl. China 25: 351, 2009
Basionym: Aerides lasiopetala Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL 4 (1): 130, 1805.
Homotypic synonym: Eria lasiopetala (Willd.) Ormerod, Opera Bot. View in CoL 124: 22, 1995.
Heterotypic synonyms: Dendrobium pubescens Hook., Exot. Fl. 2: t. 124, 1824. Eria pubescens (Hook.) Lindl. ex G.Don in J.C.Loudon, Hort. Brit.: 372, 1830. Pinalia pubescens (Hook.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen . Pl. 2: 679, 1891.
Dendrolirium albidotomentosum Blume, Bijdr. Fl. Ned. Ind. : 345, 1825. Eria albidotomentosa (Blume) Lindl. , Gen . Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 66, 1830. Pinalia albidotomentosa (Blume) Kuntze, Revis. Gen . Pl. 2: 678, 1891.
Eria flava Lindl. , Gen . Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 65, 1830, nom. superfl.
Eria lanata Griff., Not. Pl. Asiat. 3: 301, 1851. Eria flava Lindl. var. lanata (Griff.) Hook. f., Fl. Brit. India 5: 801, 1890. Eria pubescens (Hook.) Lindl. ex G.Don var. lanata (Griff.) Karth. in S.Karthikeyan & al., Fl. Ind. Enum. — Monocot.: 135, 1989. Type:— MYANMAR. Tanintharyi Region: Myeik District, Griffith 810 (holotype: K).
Eria elongata Lindl., J. Proc. Linn. Soc., Bot. 3: 49, 1859, nom. illeg. [non Blume 1856]. Pinalia lobbii Kuntze, Revis. Gen . Pl. 2: 679, 1891. Eria flava Lindl. var. elongata Kraenzl. in H.G.A.Engler (ed.), Pflanzenr., IV, 50 II B 21 (50): 55, 1911. Types:— MYANMAR. Mon State: Mawlamyine District, Lobb s.n. (lectotype K-LINDL, designated by Seidenfaden 1982: 57; isolectotype: W-R 41872). Syntypes: same loc., Griffith 346 (K-LINDL); same loc., Griffith 347 (K-LINDL; icon. W-R 41847).
Eria laniceps Rchb. f., Hamburger Garten- Blumenzeitung 19: 10, 1863.
Specimens examined:— KACHIN. Putao District : 570−590 m, 18 Mar 2009, Kurzweil & Saw Lwin KL 2538 ( SING) . SAGAING. Mawlaik District : 275 m, 31 Mar 1927 , Chin 5811 ( K) ; Kale District : 10 Feb 2009, Kyaw Khaing S-0038 ( TNS [s]) . MANDALAY. Myingyan District : fide Aung et al. (2020: 82) . YANGON. Unspecified: McClelland s.n. ( K) , det. S. Misra. TENASSERIM. Helfer s.n. ( K) . MON. Mawlamyine District: types; same loc., Parish 51 ( K, icon. W-R 21285 ); same loc., Parish 119 ( K, W-R 2184 p.p.); same loc., Lace 5594 ( E, K) . TANINTHARYI. Dawei District: fide Aung et al. (2020: 82); Myeik District : type. Also reported from Rakhine State and Ayeyarwady Region by Kress et al. (2003: 77; as Eria pubescens ), but we have not seen material from these areas.
Distribution:— India, the Himalayas, Myanmar, Thailand, Indochina, southern China and western Malesia.
Notes:— Seidenfaden (1982) accepted Eria albidotomentosa , E. lanata , E. laniceps and E. pubescens as distinct species. Later, E. albidotomentosa and E. pubescens were combined after morphometric studies. Eria lanata is only slightly different from the holotype of E. pubescens in its shortly clawed epichile, so we include it here. Pearce & Cribb (2002: 385) considered E. laniceps to be a dubious entity that they could not recognise after study of numerous specimens of E. lasiopetala . It too is included in the synonymy here.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.